| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Hahn, Robert G., et al.
(författare)
-
Urine measurement indicates the plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration during optimization of heart failure treatment
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. - : TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. - 0036-5513 .- 1502-7686. ; 76:2, s. 112-117
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: To assess the correlation between the amino-terminal pro-hormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration in blood and urine during a period when actively adjusting the treatment of heart failure (HF). Methods: Plasma and urine analyses of NT-proBNP were compared in 51 patients on admission to and discharge from a nurse-led outpatient clinic where HF treatment was optimized. The median time between the two measurements was 42 days. Correlations were analyzed using linear regression, where R-2 is the degree of variability in the plasma NT-proBNP concentration that can be accounted for by the urinary NT-proBNP. Results: There was a statistically significant linear relationship between the urine and plasma concentrations of NT-proBNP on both occasions, but R-2 varied greatly depending on how the data were presented. The correlation between the raw data showed an R-2 of only 30%, and it almost doubled upon logarithm transformation, which shows that the variability (error) was concentration-dependent. Correction of the urinary NT-proBNP for urinary creatinine further increased R-2 for the logarithm-transformed correlation to 68% on admission and 76% on discharge. The highest R-2 (77%) was obtained when the relative changes in urinary NT-proBNP/creatinine between admission and discharge were compared with the corresponding relative changes in the plasma concentration. The sensitivity and specificity of the urine in indicating plasma concentration changes > 10% were 82% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion: Relative changes in plasma NT-proBNP could be reliably estimated from urine samples during a period of optimization of HF treatment.
|
|
| 3. |
- Linssen, G. C. M., et al.
(författare)
-
A comparison of the prognostic value of BNP versus NT-proBNP after hospitalisation for heart failure
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Netherlands Heart Journal. - : BOHN STAFLEU VAN LOGHUM BV. - 1568-5888 .- 1876-6250. ; 26:10, s. 486-492
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Concentrations of circulating B-type natriuretic peptides provide important prognostic information in heart failure (HF) patients. We directly compared the prognostic performance of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) versus N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP) measurements in a large population of HF patients at hospital discharge after an admission for decompensated HF. Methods and results BNP and NT-proBNP were measured in 563 stable HF patients before discharge. All patients were followed for a fixed period of 18 months. The primary endpoint was time to first major event (HF hospitalisation or death). Patients were in NYHA class II (47%) or III/IV (53%) at discharge and the mean age of the patients was 71 +/- 11 years, 217 (39%) females, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.32 +/- 0.14 and 234 (42%) had an ischaemic aetiology of HF. During the study, 236 patients (42%) reached the primary endpoint. Multivariate odds ratios of the primary endpoint for doubling of baseline levels of BNP and NT-proBNP were 1.46 (95% CI 1.19-1.80, p amp;lt; 0.001) and 1.45 (95% CI 1.18-1.78, p amp;lt; 0.001), respectively. The multivariable adjusted areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for prediction of the primary endpoint for doubling of BNP and NT-proBNP were 0.69 and 0.68, respectively. Direct comparison of the prognostic value of BNP and NT-proBNP did not reveal significant differences. Conclusions BNP and NT-proBNP at discharge for hospitalisation for HF are powerful, and equally strong and independent predictors of all-cause death and HF rehospitalisation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Luttik, M. L. A., et al.
(författare)
-
Design and methodology of the COACH-2 (Comparative study on guideline adherence and patient compliance in heart failure patients) study: HF clinics versus primary care in stable patients on optimal therapy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: NETHERLANDS HEART JOURNAL. - : Springer Verlag (Germany). - 1568-5888 .- 1876-6250. ; 20:7-8, s. 307-312
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Since the number of heart failure (HF) patients is still growing and long-term treatment of HF patients is necessary, it is important to initiate effective ways for structural involvement of primary care services in HF management programs. However, evidence on whether and when patients can be referred back to be managed in primary care is lacking. To determine whether long-term patient management in primary care, after initial optimisation of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment in a specialised HF clinic, is equally effective as long-term management in a specialised HF clinic in terms of guideline adherence and patient compliance. The study is designed as a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Two-hundred patients will be randomly assigned to be managed and followed in primary care or in a HFclinic. Patients are eligible to participate if they are (1) clinically stable, (2) optimally up-titrated on medication (according to ESC guidelines) and, (3) have received optimal education and counselling on pre-specified issues regarding HF and its treatment. Furthermore, close cooperation between secondary and primary care in terms of back referral to or consultation of the HF clinic will be provided.The primary outcome will be prescriber adherence and patient compliance with medication after 12 months. Secondary outcomes measures will be readmission rate, mortality, quality of life and patient compliance with other lifestyle changes. The results of the study will add to the understanding of the role of primary care and HF clinics in the long-term follow-up of HF patients.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- van Veldhuisen, Dirk J., et al.
(författare)
-
B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Prognosis in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - : Elsevier. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 61:14, s. 1498-1506
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives This study sought to determine the prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), in comparison to data in HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) EF (andlt;= 40%). less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanBackground Management of patients with HFPEF is difficult. BNP is a useful biomarker in patients with reduced LVEF, but data in HFPEF are scarce. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods In this study, 615 patients with mild to moderate HF (mean age 70 years, LVEF 33%) were followed for 18 months. BNP concentrations were measured at baseline and were related to the primary outcome, that is, a composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization, and to mortality alone. The population was divided in quintiles, according to LVEF, and patients with reduced LVEF were compared with those with HFPEF. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults There were 257 patients (42%) who had a primary endpoint and 171 (28%) who died. BNP levels were significantly higher in patients with reduced LVEF than in those with HFPEF (p andlt; 0.001). BNP was a strong predictor of outcome, but LVEF was not. Importantly, if similar levels of BNP were compared across the whole spectrum of LVEF, and for different cutoff levels of LVEF, the associated risk of adverse outcome was similar in HFPEF patients as in those with reduced LVEF. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions BNP levels are lower in patients with HFPEF than in patients with HF with reduced LVEF, but for a given BNP level, the prognosis in patients with HFPEF is as poor as in those with reduced LVEF. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1498-506)
|
|
