| 1. |
- Greve, Anders M., et al.
(författare)
-
Contrasting Hemodynamic Mechanisms of Losartan- vs. Atenolol-Based Antihypertensive Treatment : A LIFE Study
- 2012
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Hypertension. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0895-7061 .- 1941-7225. ; 25:9, s. 1017-1023
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND Pharmaceutical differences in central hemodynamics might influence cardiac response to antihypertensive treatment despite similar lowering of brachial blood pressure (BP). METHODS Data from all patients with at least two echocardiographic examinations in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) echocardiographic substudy (n = 801); high-risk patients on losartan- vs. atenolol-based antihypertensive therapy. Echocardiography was performed annually for 4 years to measure stroke index (SI), heart rate, cardiac index (CI), conduit artery stiffness assessed as pulse pressure/stroke index (PP/SI) and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI). RESULTS Atenolol- and losartan-based therapy reduced BP similarly (cumulative difference in mean brachial blood pressure 0.3 mm Hg, P = 0.65). After 4 years the cumulative means of SI and heart rate were 1.8 ml/m(2) higher and 5.7 beats/min lower on atenolol-based treatment, respectively (both P < 0.001). This kept CI below baseline in atenolol-treated patients, whereas in the losartan group CI was unchanged from baseline throughout the study. TPRI was decreased more and remained lower in the losartan group (cumulative difference in mean TPRI 287 dynes/sec(-5)/cm/m(2), P < 0.001). These findings partly explained univariate differences in systolic- and diastolic function indices between the two treatments; fully adjusted losartan was only associated with a smaller left atrial diameter (cumulative mean difference 0.07 cm; 95% confidence intervals, -0.13 to -0.01, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Contrasting hemodynamics impacted cardiac response to similar reductions in brachial BP on losartan- vs. atenolol-based therapy. The similar reduction of PP/SI suggests that the antihypertensive regimens used in the LIFE study had comparable effects on arterial stiffness (LIFE study; NCT00338260)
|
|
| 2. |
- Mancusi, C., et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of isolated systolic hypertension on normalization of left ventricular structure during antihypertensive treatment in patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LIFE)
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 34:Supplement: 1, s. 597-597
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Objective: Hypertension is associated with changes in left ventricular(LV) mass and geometry. We tested the impact of isolated systolichypertension (ISH) on normalization of LV structure during antihypertensive treatment.Methods: Baseline and annual echocardiograms were recorded in 875 hypertensive patients with electrocardiographic signs of LV hypertrophy during 4.8 years randomized losartan or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) reduction inhypertension study.Results: Patients with ISH at baseline (n=128) were older, included more women, patients with diabetes or previous myocardial infarctioncompared to non-ISH patients (n=747) (all p<0.05). Baseline systolicblood pressure (BP), LV mass and ejection fraction (EF) did not differ between groups, while pulse pressure/stroke volume index (PP/SVi, an index of arterial stiffness) was higher in the ISH group (p<0.01). At the final study visit, systolic BP, LV mass, relative wall thickness (RWT) and PP/SVi were higher in the ISH group (all p<0.05). In particular, ISH patients had less reduction in LV mass and more residual LV hypertrophy compared to non-ISH patients (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, ISH at baseline predicted higher LV mass at study end (β=0.53) independent ofhigher baseline LV mass (β=0.54) body mass index (β=0.10), atenolol-based treatment (β=0.09), and higher systolic BP (β=0.07), RWT (β=0.23) and lower LV EF (β=-0.24) at the final visit (all p<0.05), while age, historyof diabetes and PP/SVi were not significant covariates in the model.Conclusions: Antihypertensive treatment is associated with impairednormalization of LV mass and LV geometry in ISH patients with ECG LV hypertrophy. The findings may help explain the higher cardiovascular event-rate previously reported in LIFE ISH-patients.
|
|
