| 1. |
- Andersson, Margareta A.T., et al.
(författare)
-
The influence of different calcium-based additions on desulphurisation and inclusion characteristics
- 2001
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of metallurgy. - : Wiley. - 0371-0459 .- 1600-0692. ; 30:3, s. 127-135
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The size, distribution, and composition of inclusions during the desulphurisation and deoxidation steps were studied in laboratory experiments. 3 different calcium-based desulphurisation mixtures were used. The number of inclusions and composition of inclusions were then determined using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. The results show that 2 of the 3 proposed desulphurisation mixtures managed to render lower and roughly equivalent inclusion counts. The results also show that the composition of the inclusions in all 3 samples varied from the beginning to the end of the desulphurisation process. A desulphurisation mixture consisting of Al, CaO, CaCO3 and CaSi produced the overall best results with respect to desulphurisation and inclusion characteristics.
|
|
| 2. |
- Isaksson, Marléne, et al.
(författare)
-
Exclusion of Disperse Orange 3 is possible from the textile dye mix present in the Swedish baseline patch test series. A study by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Contact Dermatitis. - : Wiley. - 0105-1873 .- 1600-0536. ; 88:1, s. 54-59
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% in petrolatum contains Disperse Blue (DB) 35, Disperse Yellow 3, Disperse Orange (DO) 1 and 3, Disperse Red 1 and 17, and DB 106 and 124. The most frequent allergen in TDM-positive patients is DO 3. Around 85% of para-phenylenediamine (PPD)-allergic dermatitis patients have been positive to DO 3. There has been a discussion to exclude DO 3 from TDM 6.6% because of strong simultaneous reactions to TDM and PPD. Objectives To study if DO 3 can be excluded from TDM 6.6%. Methods Patch tests were performed on 1481 dermatitis patients with TDM 6.6%, TDM 7.0% (without DO 3 but the other disperse dyes at 1.0% each), DO 3 1.0%, and PPD 1.0% pet. Results Contact allergy to TDM 6.6% was 3.6% and to TDM 7.0% was 3.0%. All 26 DO 3-positive patients were positive to PPD. The 44 patients positive to TDM 7.0% plus the 13 positive to PPD and TDM 6.6% but negative to TDM 7.0% were 57, outnumbering the 53 positive to TDM 6.6%. Conclusion TDM 7.0% can replace TDM 6.6% in the Swedish baseline series, since TDM 7.0% together with PPD 1.0% will detect patients with textile dye allergy.
|
|
