| 1. |
- Andersson, Christian, et al.
(författare)
-
Effektiviteten i Försäkringskassans ärendehandläggning : en granskning av resurseffektiviteten vid Försäkringskassans lokala försäkringscenter åren 2010–2013 med DEA-metoden
- 2017
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Försäkringskassan administrerar stora delar av den svenska socialförsäkringen och är den myndighet som ansvarar för den största delen av statens utbetalningar av ersättningar till enskilda individer. Försäkringskassan förfogar över cirka 8,4 miljarder i förvaltningsanslag och har drygt 14 000 anställda. Denna kostnad och storlek, tillsammans med myndighetens centrala uppgift för trygghetssystemen, gör det viktigt att verksamheten bedrivs effektivt.Denna rapport analyserar den relativa effektiviteten på 44 av Försäkringskassans lokala försäkringscenter (LFC) under perioden 2010–2013. I dag är Försäkringskassan kontor organiserade på ett annat sätt, men slutsatserna och lärdomarna är fortfarande relevanta eftersom själva handläggningen i mångt och mycket är oförändrad.I analysen används en matematisk metod kallad DEA-metoden (Data Envelopment Analysis), där effektiviteten mäts genom att produktionen av beslut och aktiviteter jämförs med de förbrukade resurserna. Metoden gör det möjligt att identifiera mindre effektiva LFC, som producerar mindre än andra LFC med en given mängd resurser.
|
|
| 2. |
- Godtman, Rebecka Arnsrud, 1981, et al.
(författare)
-
Men's Acceptance of Screening for Prostate Cancer with Prostate-specific Antigen, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate Biopsy
- 2024
-
Ingår i: EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY. - 2588-9311. ; 7:3, s. 553-562
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: A prerequisite before introducing a screening program is that the screening examinations are acceptable to participants. Objective: To evaluate the acceptance and bother of prostate cancer screening examinations. Design, setting, and participants: The randomized population -based G & Ouml;TEBORG-2 prostate cancer screening trial invited >37 000 men for prostate -specific antigen (PSA) testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in case of elevated PSA and prostate biopsy (targeted and/or systematic) if indicated. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire and rate the level of bother associated with each examination (PSA, MRI, and prostate biopsy) on a categorical scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = "not at all bothersome" and 5 = "very bothersome"), and to rate their willingness to repeat the examinations, by marking an X on a continuous scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = "yes, without any hesitation" and 10 = "no, absolutely not''). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used. Results and limitations: Compliance with MRI was 96% (1790/1872), compliance with biopsy was 89% (810/907), and the response rate to the questionnaire was 75% (608/810). Men who underwent all examinations ( n = 577) responded that biopsy was more bothersome than PSA test ( p < 0.001) and MRI ( p < 0.001). High levels of bother (>= 4 out of 5) were reported by 2% (12/577) for PSA test, 8% (46/577) for MRI, and 43% (247/577) for biopsy. Men were more willing to repeat MRI than biopsy ( p < 0.001), but the difference was small (median 0.2 [interquartile range 0.1-0.6] vs 0.5 [0.1-2.0]). Conclusions: Biopsies are more bothersome than MRI, but a large majority of men accept to repeat both examinations if necessary. Omitting biopsy for MRI-negative men and shifting to targeted biopsies only will reduce bother for men participating in prostate cancer screening. Patient summary: We asked men how bothersome they found the prostate -specific antigen (PSA) test, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prostate biopsies. Biopsies were more bothersome than PSA and MRI, but most men were willing to repeat all procedures if necessary. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
|
|
| 3. |
- Hugosson, Jonas, 1955, et al.
(författare)
-
Prostate Cancer Screening with PSA and MRI Followed by Targeted Biopsy Only.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: The New England journal of medicine. - 1533-4406. ; 387:23, s. 2126-2137
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Screening for prostate cancer is burdened by a high rate of overdiagnosis. The most appropriate algorithm for population-based screening is unknown.We invited 37,887 men who were 50 to 60 years of age to undergo regular prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Participants with a PSA level of 3 ng per milliliter or higher underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate; one third of the participants were randomly assigned to a reference group that underwent systematic biopsy as well as targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions shown on MRI. The remaining participants were assigned to the experimental group and underwent MRI-targeted biopsy only. The primary outcome was clinically insignificant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of 3+3. The secondary outcome was clinically significant prostate cancer, defined as a Gleason score of at least 3+4. Safety was also assessed.Of the men who were invited to undergo screening, 17,980 (47%) participated in the trial. A total of 66 of the 11,986 participants in the experimental group (0.6%) received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant prostate cancer, as compared with 72 of 5994 participants (1.2%) in the reference group, a difference of -0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.0 to -0.4; relative risk, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64; P<0.001). The relative risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in the experimental group as compared with the reference group was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.1). Clinically significant cancer that was detected only by systematic biopsy was diagnosed in 10 participants in the reference group; all cases were of intermediate risk and involved mainly low-volume disease that was managed with active surveillance. Serious adverse events were rare (<0.1%) in the two groups.The avoidance of systematic biopsy in favor of MRI-directed targeted biopsy for screening and early detection in persons with elevated PSA levels reduced the risk of overdiagnosis by half at the cost of delaying detection of intermediate-risk tumors in a small proportion of patients. (Funded by Karin and Christer Johansson's Foundation and others; GÖTEBORG-2 ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN94604465.).
|
|
| 4. |
- Josefsson, Andreas, 1979-, et al.
(författare)
-
Performance of 4Kscore as a Reflex Test to Prostate-specific Antigen in the GÖTEBORG-2 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: European Urology. - : Elsevier. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and objective: We investigated whether adding 4Kscore as a reflex test to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) could improve the screening algorithm for prostate cancer (PC). Methods: In the GÖTEBORG-2 PC screening trial, 38 000men (50–60 yr) were invited to PSA testing and, if elevated, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For 571 men with PSA ≥3.0 ng/ml and evaluable outcomes, 4Kscore was calculated. The performance using a prespecified 4Kscore cutoff of 7.5% was evaluated. Key findings and limitations: The area under the curve for 4Kscore to identify intermediate- and high-risk PC was 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.79–0.89), and the positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 15% (0.12–0.20) and 99% (97–100%), respectively. Of the 54 men diagnosed with intermediate- or high-grade PC, two had a 4Kscore cutoff below 7.5%, both with organ-confined intermediate-risk PC. Per 1000 men with elevated PSA, adding 4Kscore would have resulted in avoidance of MRI for 408 (41%) men, biopsies for 95 (28% reduction) men, and diagnosis of 23 low-grade cancers (23% reduction) while delaying the diagnosis of four men with intermediate-grade cancers (4%). Conclusions and clinical implications: Including 4Kscore as a reflex test for men with elevated PSA reduces the need for MRI and biopsy markedly, and results in less overdiagnosis of low-grade PC at the cost of delaying the diagnosis of intermediate-grade PC in a few men. These results add further evidence for including new blood-based biomarkers in addition to PSA to improve the harm and benefit ratio of PC screening and reduce the need for resource-demanding MRI and biopsies. Patient summary: In this study, 4Kscore, a blood-based biomarker, as a reflex test for men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), reduces the need for magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy. These results support the inclusion of new blood-based biomarkers in addition to PSA.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kohestani, Kimia, et al.
(författare)
-
Performance and inter-observer variability of prostate MRI (PI-RADS version 2) outside high-volume centres
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of urology. - : Taylor & Francis. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 53:5, s. 304-311
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Despite the growing trend to embrace pre-biopsy MRI in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PC), its performance and inter-observer variability outside high-volume centres remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate sensitivity of and variability between readers of prostate MRI outside specialized units with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen as the reference standard.Materials and methods: Retrospective study comprising a consecutive cohort of all 97 men who underwent MRI and subsequent RP between January 2012 and December 2014 at a private hospital in Sweden. Three readers, blinded to clinical data, reviewed all images (including 11 extra prostate MRI to reduce bias). A tumour was considered detected if the overall PI-RADS v2 score was 3-5 and there was an approximate match (same or neighbouring sector) of tumour sector according to a 24 sector system used for both MRI and whole mount sections.Results: Detection rate for the index tumour ranged from 67 to 76%, if PI-RADS 3-5 lesions were considered positive and 54-66% if only PI-RADS score 4-5 tumours were included. Detection rate for aggressive tumours (GS >= 4 + 3) was higher; 83.1% for PI-RADS 3-5 and 79.2% for PI-RADS 4-5. The agreement between readers showed average values of 0.41 for PI-RADS score 3-5 and 0.51 for PI-RADS score 4-5.Conclusions: Prostate MRI evidenced a moderate detection rate for clinically significant PC with a rather large variability between readers. Clinics outside specialized units must have knowledge of their performance of prostate MRI before considering omitting biopsies in men with negative MRI.
|
|
| 6. |
- Kohestani, Kimia, et al.
(författare)
-
The Göteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Urology. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 55:2, s. 116-124
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective To describe the study design of the GoTEBORG prostate cancer screening (PC) 2 (Goteborg-2), a prospective, randomised, population-based trial of PC screening. This trial evaluates whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing followed by 3 Tesla prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and targeted biopsy can reduce overdiagnosis, while maintaining the detection of clinically significant cancer, compared to PSA-screening and systematic biopsy. Materials and methods A random sample of men 50-60 years in the Goteborg area, Sweden, identified from the Total Population Register, were randomised to either a screening or control group (CG). Participants in the screening group (SG) were further randomised into one of three arms: (1) PSA-test; if PSA >= 3 ng/mL, then MRI and systematic biopsy, plus targeted biopsy to suspicious lesions as per Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2) 3-5; (2) PSA-test; if PSA >= 3 ng/mL, then MRI, and targeted biopsy only if PI-RADSv2 3-5; (3) identical to Arm 2, except lower PSA-cut-off >= 1.8 ng/mL. The primary outcome is the detection rate of clinically insignificant PC (defined as Gleason Score 3 + 3 [Grade Group 1]) comparing all men with PSA >= 3 ng/mL in Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 + 3. Results Randomisation and enrolment started in September 2015. Accrual has hitherto resulted in 38,770 men randomised to the SG. The participation rate is 50%. Invitation to the first screening round was completed in June 2020. Conclusions The Goteborg-2 trial will provide new knowledge about the performance of prostate MRI in a screening setting.
|
|
| 7. |
- Månsson, Linda, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of Concurrent Validity between a Smartphone Self-Test Application and Clinical Tests for Balance and Leg Strength
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Sensors. - : MDPI. - 1424-8220. ; 21:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The evolving use of sensors to objectively assess movements is a potentially valuable addition to clinical assessments. We have developed a new self-test application prototype, MyBalance, in the context of fall prevention aimed for use by older adults in order to independently assess balance and functional leg strength. The objective of this study was to investigate the new self-test application for concurrent validity between clinical instruments and variables collected with a smartphone. The prototype has two test procedures: static standing balance test in two positions, and leg strength test performed as a sit-to-stand test. Thirty-one older adults were assessed for balance and functional leg strength, in an outpatient physiotherapy setting, using seven different clinical assessments and three sensor-tests. The results show that clinical instruments and sensor measurements correlate to a higher degree for the smartphone leg strength test. For balance tests, only a few moderate correlations were seen in the Feet Together position and no significant correlations for the Semi Tandem Stance. This study served as a first step to develop a smartphone self-test application for older adults to assess functional balance at home. Further research is needed to test validity, reliability, and user-experience of this new self-test application.
|
|
| 8. |
- Möller, Fredrik, 1990, et al.
(författare)
-
Prostate Cancers in the Prostate-specific Antigen Interval of 1.8-3 ng/ml: Results from the Göteborg-2 Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
- 2024
-
Ingår i: European Urology. - 0302-2838. ; 86:2, s. 95-100
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and targeted biopsies reduce overdiagnosis of prostate cancer (PC). It is uncertain how this strategy performs for low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.To investigate the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) distribution, frequency, and characteristics of screen-detected PC with PSA of 1.8-<3 ng/ml and 3-<10 ng/ml.In the population-based Göteborg-2 screening study, 17974 men choose to participate by having a PSA test (2015-2020). One-third of the participants (n=6006) were randomized to arm 3, men with a PSA value of ≥1.8 ng/ml were recommended for MRI. Men with positive MRI (PI-RADS 3-5) had four targeted biopsies from each MRI-visible lesion.Clinically significant PC was defined as Gleason score ≥3+4.A total of 6006 men were included. The median age was 55.9 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 52.6-59.6). Of them, 4929 (82%) had PSA of <1.8 ng/ml, 670 (11%) had PSA of 1.8-<3 ng/ml (low-PSA group, median PSA 2.1 ng/ml [IQR 1.9-2.5]), and 377 (6.3%) had PSA of 3-<10 ng/ml (high-PSA group, median PSA 3.9 ng/ml [IQR 3.3-5.0]). PI-RADS scores of 3, 4, and 5 were observed in 7.8%, 15%, and 1.0% of men in the low-PSA group, and in 6.9%, 17%, and 5.3% of men in the high-PSA group, respectively. PC was found in 64 men (41%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.49) with positive MRI findings in the low-PSA group, of whom 33 (21%) had Gleason 6 (insignificant PC) and 31 (20%) had Gleason ≥7 (significant PC). In the high-PSA group, PC was detected in 61 men (56%, 95% CI 0.46-0.66), of whom 26 (24%) had Gleason 6 (insignificant PC) and 35 (32%) had Gleason ≥7 (significant PC). Limitations include results from only a single screening round.A non-negligible number of men with PSA 1.8-3 ng/ml have clinically significant PC. Whether a delay in the diagnosis of these tumors until they reached PSA ≥3 ng/ml would impair their chance of cure remains to be evaluated.We studied screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and magnetic resonance imaging in men with PSA 1.8-3 ng/ml. We found a non-negligible number of potentially harmful prostate cancers in these men.
|
|
| 9. |
- Palmstedt, Emmeli, et al.
(författare)
-
How a population-based cohort of men estimate lifetime risk of prostate cancer in a survey before entering a prostate cancer screening trial in Sweden?
- 2024
-
Ingår i: BMJ OPEN. - 2044-6055. ; 14:8, s. 1-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives Investigating men's perceived lifetime risk of prostate cancer. Design Survey-based study to men invited for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in the G & Ouml;TEBORG-2 trial between September 2015 and June 2020. Setting 38 775 men in the Gothenburg area, Sweden, were invited for PSA-testing and participated in a survey. Participants 17 980 men participated in PSA-testing, of whom 13 189 completed the survey. In addition, 1264 men answered the survey only. Interventions Before having the PSA-test, men answered an electronic survey and estimated their lifetime risk of receiving a prostate cancer diagnosis on a visual analogue scale from 0% to 100%. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the median lifetime risk estimation, which was compared with Wilcoxon test to an anticipated lifetime risk of 20% (based on G & Ouml;TEBORG-1 trial). The secondary outcome was to determine factors associated with risk estimation in a multivariable linear regression model: previous prostate examination, family history, physical exercise, healthy diet, comorbidity, alcohol consumption, smoking, education level, marital status, urinary symptoms and erectile dysfunction. Results Among PSA-tested men, the median estimated lifetime risk of prostate cancer was 30% (IQR 19% to 50%), corresponding to a 10 percentage-points higher estimation compared with the anticipated risk (p<0.001). Family history of prostate cancer, moderate to severe urinary symptoms and mild to moderate erectile dysfunction were associated with >5 percentage-points higher risk estimation. Similar results were obtained for non-PSA-tested men. Conclusions Most men overestimated their prostate cancer risk which underscores the importance of providing them accurate information about prostate cancer.
|
|
| 10. |
- Wallström, Jonas, et al.
(författare)
-
Bi- or multiparametric MRI in a sequential screening program for prostate cancer with PSA followed by MRI? Results from the Goteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Radiology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0938-7994 .- 1432-1084. ; 31, s. 8692-8702
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives The PIRADS Steering Committee has called for "higher quality data before making evidence-based recommendations on MRI without contrast enhancement as an initial diagnostic work up," however, recognizing biparametric (bp) MRI as a reasonable option in a low-risk setting such as screening. With bpMRI, more men can undergo MRI at a lower cost and they can be spared the invasiveness of intravenous access. The aim of this study was to assess cancer detection in bpMRI vs mpMRI in sequential screening for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Within the ongoing Goteborg PCa screening 2 trial, we assessed cancer detection in 551 consecutive participants undergoing prostate MRI. In the same session, readers first assessed bpMRI and then mpMRI. Four targeted biopsies were performed for lesions scored PIRADS 3-5 with bpMRI and/or mpMRI. Results Cancer was detected in 84/551 cases (15.2%; 95% CI: 12.4-18.4) with mpMRI and in 83/551 cases (15.1%; 95% CI: 12.3-18.2%) with bpMRI. The relative risk (RR) for cancer detection with bpMRI compared to mpMRI was 0.99 (95% one-sided CI: > 94.8); bpMRI was non-inferior to mpMRI (10% non-inferiority margin). bpMRI resulted in fewer false positives, 45/128 (35.2%), compared to mpMRI, 52/136 (38.2%), RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84-0.98. Of 8 lesions scored positive only with mpMRI, 7 were false positives. The PPV for MRI and targeted biopsy was 83/128 (64.8%) for bpMRI and 84/136 (61.8%) for mpMRI, RR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10. Conclusions In a PSA-screened population, bpMRI was non-inferior to mpMRI for cancer detection and resulted in fewer false positives.
|
|
