| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 3. |
- Søvik, T T, et al.
(författare)
-
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: The British journal of surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1365-2168 .- 0007-1323. ; 97:2, s. 160-6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:: Laparoscopic Roux-en-$\font\ss=cmss10 scaled 1000 \hbox{Y}$ gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LDS) are surgical options for superobesity. A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate perioperative (30-day) safety and 1-year results. METHODS:: Sixty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 50-60 kg/m(2) were randomized to LRYGB or LDS. BMI, percentage of excess BMI lost, complications and readmissions were compared between groups. RESULTS:: Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. Mean operating time was 91 min for LRYGB and 206 min for LDS (P < 0.001). One LDS was converted to open surgery. Early complications occurred in four patients undergoing LRYGB and seven having LDS (P = 0.327), with no deaths. Median stay was 2 days after LRYGB and 4 days after LDS (P < 0.001). Four and nine patients respectively had late complications (P = 0.121). Mean BMI at 1 year decreased from 54.8 to 38.5 kg/m(2) after LRYGB and from 55.2 to 32.5 kg/m(2) after LDS; percentage of excess BMI lost was greater after LDS (74.8 versus 54.4 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:: LRYGB and LDS can be performed with comparable perioperative safety in superobese patients. LDS provides greater weight loss in the first year. Registration number: NCT00327912 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright (c) 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
|
| 4. |
- Miras, A D, et al.
(författare)
-
Application of the International Diabetes Federation and American Diabetes Association criteria in the assessment of metabolic control after bariatric surgery.
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. - : Wiley. - 1463-1326 .- 1462-8902. ; 16:1, s. 86-89
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have introduced specific criteria to define the 'optimization' of the metabolic state and glycaemic 'remission' of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after bariatric surgery, respectively. Our objective was to assess the percentage of patients achieving these criteria. Data were collected for body mass index, glycaemic markers, lipids, blood pressure, hypoglycaemia and medication usage from 396 morbidly obese T2DM patients who underwent bariatric surgery in two centres and followed up for 2years. At year 1, 14% of patients achieved the IDF criteria and 38% the ADA criteria, whereas at 2years 8 and 9% satisfied these criteria, respectively. A relatively low proportion of patients achieved optimization of the metabolic state and T2DM remission. These patients may potentially benefit from the combination of bariatric surgery and adjuvant medical therapy to achieve optimal metabolic outcomes.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Sovik, Torgeir T., et al.
(författare)
-
Gastrointestinal function and eating behavior after gastric bypass and duodenal switch
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 1550-7289 .- 1878-7533. ; 9:5, s. 641-647
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Duodenal switch provides greater weight loss than gastric bypass in severely obese patients; however, comparative data on the changes in gastrointestinal symptoms, bowel function, eating behavior, dietary intake, and psychosocial functioning are limited. Methods: The setting for the present study was 2 university hospitals in Norway and Sweden. Participants with a body mass index of 50-60 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to gastric bypass (n = 31) or duodenal switch (n = 29) and followed up for 2 years. Of the 60 patients, 97% completed the study. Their mean weight decreased by 31.2% after gastric bypass and 44.8% after duodenal switch. At inclusion and 1 and 2 years of follow-up, the participants completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, a bowel function questionnaire, the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-R21, a 4-day food record, and the Obesity-related Problems scale. Results: Compared with the gastric bypass group, the duodenal switch group reported more symptoms of diarrhea (P =.0002), a greater mean number of daytime defecations (P =.007), and more anal leakage of stool (50% versus 18% of participants, respectively; P =.015) after 2 years. The scores for uncontrolled and emotional eating were significantly and similarly reduced after both operations. The mean total caloric intake and intake of fat and carbohydrates were significantly reduced in both groups. Protein intake was significantly reduced only after gastric bypass (P =.008, between-group comparison). Psychosocial function was significantly improved after both operations (P =.23, between the 2 groups). Conclusion: Gastrointestinal side effects and anal leakage of stool were more pronounced after duodenal switch than after gastric bypass. Both procedures led to reduced uncontrolled and emotional eating, reduced caloric intake, and improved psychosocial functioning. (C) 2013 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Biörserud, Christina, et al.
(författare)
-
Experience of excess skin after gastric bypass or duodenal switch in patients with super obesity.
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1878-7533. ; 10:5, s. 891-896
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There is a lack of knowledge about the patient's experience of excess skin after bariatric surgery in patients with body mass index, (BMI)>50 kg/m(2). The objective of this study was to evaluate experience of excess skin after laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and explore possible gender differences. Another aim was to analyze possible correlation between the reported experiences of excess skin with changes in weight, BMI, and hip and waist circumference after surgery.
|
|
