| 1. |
- Villers, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up: Results of the French section of European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) : Absence d’effet du dépistage de cancer de la prostate par PSA à 9 ans du fait de la contamination : résultats de la section française de l’ERSPC
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Progres en Urologie. - : Elsevier BV. - 1166-7087. ; 30:5, s. 252-260
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction. - European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) mortality results were reported for 7 European countries (excluding France) and showed a significant reduction in Prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. As those results have not been part of the global ERSPC results, it is of interest to report PCa mortality at a median follow-up of 9 years for French section of ERSPC. Material and methods. - Two administrative departments were involved in the study. Only men after randomization in the screening group were invited by mail to be screened by PSA testing with two rounds at 4-6 year intervals. Biopsy was recommended if PSA> = 3.0 ng/mL. No information other that the French Association of Urology recommandations on the use of PSA was offered to the control group (own decision of physicians and patients). Follow up was based on cancer registry database. Contamination defined as the receipt of PSA testing in control arm was measured. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the Rate Ratio (RR) of PCa mortality and incidence in the screening vs. control arm. Results. - Starting from 2003, 80,696 men aged 55-69 years were included. The percentage of men in the screening arm with at least one PSA test (compliance) was 31%. Compared to the control arm. PCa incidence increased by 10% in the screening arm (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = [1.04-1.16], P=0.001), but PCa mortality did not differ (0.222 and 0.215 deaths/1000 person-years; RR= 1.03[0.75-1.42], P=0.9). Discussion. Limitations include low participation rate. PSA testing in the control arm was observed in 32% of men (contamination). Conclusions. - Contamination in control group led to no effect of PSA-based screening on prostate cancer mortality at 9 years follow-up. Level of evidence. 3. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Boevee, S J, et al.
(författare)
-
Change of tumour characteristics and treatment over time in both arms of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European journal of cancer. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-0852 .- 0959-8049. ; 46:17, s. 3082-3089
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective To evaluate a change in tumour characteristics and applied treatments over time in the control arm of all centres of the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and to compare this with similar data of the screening arm. Methods Between 1993 and 2003, 182,160 men, aged 50–74 years, were randomised to the screening arm (N = 82,816) and the control arm (N = 99,184). Men in the screening arm were offered Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing every 4 years whilst men in the control arm received usual care. Tumour characteristics and treatment were evaluated in all men diagnosed with prostate cancer up to December 2006 or the third screening round. Data on the control arm were divided into 3 periods: 1994–1998, 1999–2002 and 2003–2006. Results Tumour characteristics were more favourable over time in both the control and the screening arm, with especially increasing proportions of T1C tumours with 29% in 1994–1998 versus 50% in 2003–2006 and 48% at the initial screening round versus 75% at the third screening round, respectively. Tumour characteristics observed in the last period of the control arm were comparable to tumour characteristics in the initial screening round. In the control arm, treatment changed over time with surgery as the most common treatment in the entire observed period, but almost doubling of expectant management and the combination of hormone therapy and radiotherapy over time. In the initial screening round, surgery was the most common treatment (42%), changing over time to expectant management as the most frequently applied treatment in the third screening round (33%). Conclusion Tumour characteristics in the control arm became more favourable over time and show similarity with prostate cancer cases detected at the initial screening round. The most prominent change in treatment over time was an increase of application of expectant management in both arms of the ERSPC. These observations reflect an increasing rate of opportunistic testing over time in men randomised to the control arm.
|
|
