| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Melén, Erik, et al.
(author)
-
Short-acting β2 -agonist use and asthma exacerbations in Swedish children: A SABINA Junior study.
- 2022
-
In: Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology. - : Wiley. - 1399-3038 .- 0905-6157. ; 33:11
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In adults and adolescents with asthma, use of ≥3 short-acting β2 -agonist (SABA) canisters/year is associated with increased exacerbation risk. Whether this association is present in younger children remains unknown. In this SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) Junior study, we assessed the association of SABA collection with exacerbation risk in the general Swedish pediatric asthma population.This population-based cohort study utilized linked data from the Swedish national healthcare registries involving patients with asthma (<18years) treated in secondary care between 2006-2015. Exacerbation risk, by baseline SABA collection (0-2 vs. ≥3 canisters, further examined as ordinal/continuous variable) and stratified on comorbid atopic disease (allergic rhinitis, dermatitis and eczema, and food/other allergies), was assessed for 1-year follow-up using negative binomial regression.Of 219,561 patients assessed, 45.4%, 31.7%, and 26.5% of patients aged 0-5, 6-11, and 12-17years, respectively, collected ≥3 SABA canisters during the baseline year (high use). Collection of ≥3 SABA canisters (vs. 0-2) was associated with increased exacerbation risk during follow-up (incidence rate ratios [95% confidence interval]: 1.35 [1.29-1.42], 1.22 [1.15-1.29], and 1.26 [1.19-1.34] for 0-5-, 6-11-, and 12-17-year-olds, respectively); the association persisted with SABA as a continuous variable and was stronger among patients without atopic diseases (32%-44% increased risk versus. 14%-21% for those with atopic disease across groups).High SABA use was associated with increased asthma exacerbation risk in children, particularly in those without comorbid atopic diseases, emphasizing the need for asthma medication reviews and reformative initiatives by caregivers and healthcare providers on SABA use.
|
|
| 4. |
- Wilkinson, Alex, et al.
(author)
-
Environmental Sustainability in Respiratory Care : An Overview of the healthCARe-Based envirONmental Cost of Treatment (CARBON) Programme
- 2022
-
In: Advances in Therapy. - : Springer. - 0741-238X .- 1865-8652. ; 39:5, s. 2270-2280
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction Faced with the challenges of climate change, countries are seeking to decarbonise their economies. A greater understanding of what comprises the carbon footprint of care in healthcare systems will identify potential strategies for reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In respiratory care, the focus has been on preventer inhalers, thereby omitting contributions from other aspects such as healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and reliever inhaler use. The healthCARe-Based envirONmental cost of treatment (CARBON) programme aims to provide a broader understanding of the carbon footprint associated with respiratory care. Methods CARBON will quantify the carbon footprint of medications and HCRU among approximately 2.5 million patients with respiratory diseases from seven ongoing studies spanning more than 40 countries. Across studies, to obtain the carbon footprint of all inhaled, oral, and injectable medications, SimaPro life cycle assessment software modelling resource and energy consumption data, in addition to Ecoinvent(R) data sets and certified published studies, will be used. The carbon footprint of HCRU in the United Kingdom will be estimated by applying the methodology and data obtained from the Sustainable Healthcare Coalition Care Pathway Guidance. Planned Outcomes In asthma, CARBON studies will quantify GHG emissions associated with well-controlled versus not well-controlled asthma, the contribution of short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SABA) reliever inhalers (and their potential overuse) to the carbon footprint of care, and how implementation of treatment guidelines can drive improved outcomes and footprint reduction. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), CARBON studies will assess the impact of exacerbation history on GHG emissions associated with HCRU and SABA use in subsequent years and estimate the carbon footprint associated with all aspects of COPD care. Conclusion CARBON aims to show that the principle of evidence-led care focused on improvement of clinical outcomes has the potential to benefit patients and the environment.
|
|
