| 1. |
- Georg, Dietmar, et al.
(författare)
-
Photon beam quality variations of a flattening filter free linear accelerator
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Medical Physics. - : Wiley. - 0094-2405. ; 37:1, s. 49-53
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Recently, there has been an increasing interest in operating conventional linear accelerators without a flattening filter. The aim of this study was to determine beam quality variations as a function of off-axis ray angle for unflattened beams. In addition, a comparison was made with the off-axis energy variation in flattened beams. Methods: Two Elekta Precise linear accelerators were modified in order to enable radiation delivery with and without the flattening filter in the beam line. At the Medical University Vienna (Vienna, Austria), half value layer (HVL) measurements were performed for 6 and 10 MV with an in-house developed device that can be easily mounted on the gantry. At St. Luke's Hospital (Dublin, Ireland), measurements were performed at 6 MV in narrow beam geometry with the gantry tilted around 270 degrees with pinhole collimators, an attenuator, and the chamber positioned on the table. All attenuation measurements were performed with ionization chambers and a buildup cap (2 mm brass) or a PMMA mini phantom (diameter 3 cm, measurement depth 2.5 cm). Results: For flattened 6 and 10 MV photon beams from the Elekta linac the relative HVL(theta) varies by about 11% for an off-axis ray angle theta=10 degrees. These results agree within +/-2% with a previously proposed generic off-axis energy correction. For unflattened beams, the variation was less than 5% in the whole range of off-axis ray angles up to 10 degrees. The difference in relative HVL data was less than 1% for unflattened beams at 6 and 10 MV. Conclusions: Off-axis energy variation is rather small in unflattened beams and less than half the one for flattened beams. Thus, ignoring the effect of off-axis energy variation for dose calculations in unflattened beams can be clinically justified. (C) 2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3264617]
|
|
| 2. |
- Kragl, Gabriele, et al.
(författare)
-
Dosimetric characteristics of 6 and 10 MV unflattened photon beams
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-0887 .- 0167-8140. ; 93:1, s. 141-146
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: To determine dosimetric properties of unflattened megavoltage photon beams. Materials and methods: Dosimetric data including depth dose, profiles, output factors and phantom scatter factors from three different beam qualities provided by Elekta Precise linacs, operated with and without flattening filter were examined. Additional measurements of leaf transmission, leakage radiation and surface dose were performed. In flattening filter free (FFF) mode a 6-mm thick copper filter was placed into the beam to stabilize it. Results: Depths of dose maxima for flattened and unflattened beams did not deviate by more than 2 mm and penumbral widths agreed within 1 mm. In FFF mode the collimator exchange effect was found to be on average 0.3% for rectangular fields. Between maximum and minimum field size head scatter factors of unflattened beams showed on average 40% and 56% less variation for 6 and 10 MV beams than conventional beams. Phantom scatter factors for FFF beams differed up to 4% from the published reference data. For field sizes smaller than 15 cm, surface doses relative to the dose at d(max) increased for unflattened beams with maximum differences of 7% at 6 MV and 25% at 10 MV for a 5 x 5 cm(2) field. For a 30 x 30 cm(2) field, relative surface dose decreased by about 10% for FFF beams. Leaf transmission on the central axis was 0.3% and 0.4% lower for unflattened 6 and 10 MV beams, respectively. Leakage radiation was reduced by 52% for 6 MV and by 65% for 10 MV unflattened beams. Conclusions: The results of the study were independently confirmed at two radiotherapy centres. Phantom scatter reference data need to be reconsidered for medical accelerators operated without a flattening filter. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 93 (2009) 141-146
|
|
