| 1. |
- Ademuyiwa, Adesoji O., et al.
(författare)
-
Determinants of morbidity and mortality following emergency abdominal surgery in children in low-income and middle-income countries
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BMJ Global Health. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2059-7908. ; 1:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Child health is a key priority on the global health agenda, yet the provision of essential and emergency surgery in children is patchy in resource-poor regions. This study was aimed to determine the mortality risk for emergency abdominal paediatric surgery in low-income countries globally.Methods: Multicentre, international, prospective, cohort study. Self-selected surgical units performing emergency abdominal surgery submitted prespecified data for consecutive children aged <16 years during a 2-week period between July and December 2014. The United Nation's Human Development Index (HDI) was used to stratify countries. The main outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality, analysed by multilevel logistic regression.Results: This study included 1409 patients from 253 centres in 43 countries; 282 children were under 2 years of age. Among them, 265 (18.8%) were from low-HDI, 450 (31.9%) from middle-HDI and 694 (49.3%) from high-HDI countries. The most common operations performed were appendectomy, small bowel resection, pyloromyotomy and correction of intussusception. After adjustment for patient and hospital risk factors, child mortality at 30 days was significantly higher in low-HDI (adjusted OR 7.14 (95% CI 2.52 to 20.23), p<0.001) and middle-HDI (4.42 (1.44 to 13.56), p=0.009) countries compared with high-HDI countries, translating to 40 excess deaths per 1000 procedures performed.Conclusions: Adjusted mortality in children following emergency abdominal surgery may be as high as 7 times greater in low-HDI and middle-HDI countries compared with high-HDI countries. Effective provision of emergency essential surgery should be a key priority for global child health agendas.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bass, G. A., 1979-, et al.
(författare)
-
Bile Duct Clearance and Cholecystectomy for Choledocholithiasis : Definitive Single-Stage Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Intra-Operative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus Staged Procedures
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 2163-0755 .- 2163-0763. ; 90:2, s. 240-248
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Clinical equipoise exists regarding optimal sequencing in the definitive management of choledocholithiasis. Our current study compares sequential biliary ductal clearance and cholecystectomy at an interval to simultaneous laparoendoscopic management on index admission in a pragmatic retrospective manner.METHODS: Records were reviewed for all patients admitted between January 2015-December 2018 to a Swedish and an Irish university hospital. Both hospitals differ in their practice patterns for definitive management of choledocholithiasis. At the Swedish hospital, patients with choledocholithiasis underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intra-operative rendezvous ERCP at index admission (one-stage). In contrast, interval day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed index admission ERCP (two-stage) at the Irish hospital. Clinical characteristics, post-procedural complications, and inpatient duration were compared between cohorts.RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent treatment for choledocholithiasis during the study period, of whom 222(62.2%) underwent a one-stage procedure in Sweden, while 135(37.8%) underwent treatment in two stages in Ireland. Patients in both cohorts were closely matched in terms of age, sex, and pre-operative serum total bilirubin. Patients in the one-stage group exhibited a greater inflammatory reaction on index admission (peak C-reactive protein = 136±137 vs. 95±102mg/L,p=0.024), had higher incidence of co-morbidities (age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3:37.8% vs 20.0%,p=0.003), and overall were less fit for surgery (ASA ≥3: 11.7% vs. 3.7%,p < 0.001). Despite this, a significantly-shorter mean time to definitive treatment, i.e., cholecystectomy (3.1±2.5 vs. 40.3±127 days,p=0.017), without excess morbidity, was seen in the one-stage compared to the two-stage cohort. Patients in the one-stage cohort experienced shorter mean post-procedure length of stay(3.0±4.7 vs 5.0±4.6 days,p < 0.001) and total length of hospital stay(6.5±4.6 vs 9.0±7.3 days,p=0.002). The only significant difference in postoperative complications between the cohorts was urinary retention, with a higher incidence in the one-stage cohort (19% vs. 1%, p=0.004).CONCLUSION: Where appropriate expertise and logistics exist within developing models of Acute Care Surgery worldwide, consideration should be given to index-admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative ERCP for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Our data suggest this strategy significantly shortens the time to definitive treatment, decreases total hospital stay without any excess in adverse outcomes.
|
|
