| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Henein, Michael, et al.
(författare)
-
European Calcific Coronary Artery Disease (Euro-CCAD) study : the additional value of coronary calcification, to angiography, in investigating angina patients
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 34:Supplement: 1, s. 177-177
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background and aim: This study is a part of the Euro-CCAD (CalcificCoronary Artery Disease) project, investigating the geographic prevalence of a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of >400 in patients with no flow-limiting lesions (FLL) as a potential cause for stable angina. With the development of computerized tomographic coronaryangiography (CTCA), assessment of CAC has become less fashionable, although CTCA often fails to determine the exact cause of symptoms in the absence of FLLs.Methods: Data from consecutive symptomatic intermediate risk patients (as defined by guidelines), who had both CA and calcium scoring, were compared between USA and Europe as well as between Europeancountries (Denmark, Germany, France and Spain). No patient had a priorcoronary event, intervention, valve disease or kidney failure.Results: The inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 4,444 patients, (60% males), mean age 59.3 years (SD 11.3 years). The prevalence of FLL was higher in the USA at 53% (983/1851) than in Europe at 34% (870/2593) as a whole, (p<0.001). The FLL prevalence was also different (p<0.001) within Europe: Denmark 16%, Germany 35%, France 46% and Spain 89%. In patients with no FLL, 9% had CAC >400, with no difference in prevalence between the USA and Europe, irrespective of age and gender. However, within Europe the prevalence of patients without FLL and with a CAC score >400 differed: Spain 22%, Germany 13%, France 10% and Denmark 7%. Within the total patient population 22% of those with CAC score >400 had no FLL.Conclusion: Despite the known variability in the current management of symptomatic angina patients at intermediate risk between the USA andEuropean countries, a consistent proportion (nearly 10%) exhibits severe CAC in the absence of flow limiting lesions. The presence of severe CAC could explain their symptoms through compromised coronary flow reserve. These results highlight the potential value of obtaining additional anatomical information by using CAC assessment in symptomatic patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Henein, Michael Y., et al.
(författare)
-
European Calcific Coronary Artery Disease (Euro-CCAD) study : the relationship between coronary calcification and flow limiting lesion in symptomatic patients
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 34:Supplement: 1, s. 723-723
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background and aim: This study is a part of the Euro-CCAD (CalcificCoronary Artery Disease) project, investigating the geographic prevalence of a coronary artery calcium (CAC) score of >400 in patients with no flow-limiting lesions (FLL) as a potential cause for stable angina. With the development of computerized tomographic coronaryangiography (CTCA), assessment of CAC has become less fashionable, although CTCA often fails to determine the exact cause of symptoms in the absence of FLLs.Methods: Data from consecutive symptomatic intermediate risk patients (as defined by guidelines), who had both CA and calcium scoring, were compared between USA and Europe as well as between Europeancountries (Denmark, Germany, France and Spain). No patient had a priorcoronary event, intervention, valve disease or kidney failure.Results: The inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 4,444 patients, (60% males), mean age 59.3 years (SD 11.3 years). The prevalence of FLL was higher in the USA at 53% (983/1851) than in Europe at 34% (870/2593) as a whole, (p<0.001). The FLL prevalence was also different (p<0.001) within Europe: Denmark 16%, Germany 35%, France 46% and Spain 89%. In patients with no FLL, 9% had CAC >400, with no difference in prevalence between the USA and Europe, irrespective of age and gender. However, within Europe the prevalence of patients without FLL and with a CAC score >400 differed: Spain 22%, Germany 13%, France 10% and Denmark 7%. Within the total patient population 22% of those with CAC score >400 had no FLL.Conclusion: Despite the known variability in the current management of symptomatic angina patients at intermediate risk between the USA andEuropean countries, a consistent proportion (nearly 10%) exhibits severe CAC in the absence of flow limiting lesions. The presence of severe CAC could explain their symptoms through compromised coronary flow reserve. These results highlight the potential value of obtaining additional anatomical information by using CAC assessment in symptomatic patients.
|
|
| 4. |
- Nicoll, Rachel, et al.
(författare)
-
Diabetes and male gender are key risk factor predictors of CAC extent : a Euro-CCAD study
- 2016
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background and aims: Although much has been written about the risk factor predictors of CAC extent, few studies have been carried out on symptomatic patients. Similarly, no study has directly compared predictors of CAC extent and zero CAC.Methods: From the European Calcific Coronary Artery Disease (Euro-CCAD) cohort, we retrospectively investigated 6309 symptomatic patients, 62% male, from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and USA. All had risk factor assessment and CT scanning for CAC scoring. Results: Among all patients, male gender (β = 1.36, p<0.001) and diabetes (β = 0.47, p<0.001) were the most important risk factors of CAC extent, with age, diabetes (DM), obesity, family history of CAD and number of risk factors also being predictive. Among patients with CAC, DM, hypertension (HT) and dyslipidaemia (DL) were predictors of an increasing CAC score in males and females, with DM being the strongest (p<0.001 for both). These results were echoed in quantile regression, where DM was consistently the most important predictor of CAC extent in every quantile in both males and females. HT and DL were also predictive but to a lesser extent, with HT being predictive in the high CAC quantiles and DL in the low CAC quantiles. Conclusion: In addition to male gender, DM is the most important predictor of CAC extent in both genders.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Nicoll, Rachel, et al.
(författare)
-
Gender and age effects on risk factor-based prediction of coronary artery calcium in symptomatic patients : a Euro-CCAD study
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Atherosclerosis. - : Elsevier. - 0021-9150 .- 1879-1484. ; 252, s. 32-39
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and aims: The influence of gender and age on risk factor prediction of coronary artery calcification (CAC) presence in symptomatic patients is unclear.Methods: From the European Calcific Coronary Artery Disease (EURO-CCAD) cohort, we retrospectively investigated 6309 symptomatic patients, 62% male, from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and USA. All had risk factor assessment and CT scanning for CAC scoring. Results: The prevalence of CAC among females was lower than among males in all age groups. Using multivariate logistic regression, age, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, diabetes and smoking were independently predictive of CAC presence in both genders. In addition to a progressive increase in CAC with age, the most important predictors of CAC presence were dyslipidaemia and diabetes (β = 0.64 and 0.63 respectively) in males and diabetes (β = 1.08) followed by smoking (β = 0.68) in females; these same risk factors were also important in predicting increasing CAC scores. There was no difference in the predictive ability of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in either gender for CAC presence in patients aged <50 and 50-70 years. However, in patients aged >70, only dyslipidaemia predicted CAC presence in males and only smoking and diabetes were predictive in females. Conclusion: In symptomatic patients, there are significant differences in the ability of conventional risk factors to predict CAC presence between genders and between patients aged <70 and ≥70, indicating the important role of age in predicting CAC presence.
|
|
| 7. |
- Nicoll, Rachel, et al.
(författare)
-
The coronary calcium score is a more accurate predictor of significant coronary stenosis than conventional risk factors in symptomatic patients : Euro-CCAD study
- 2016
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 207, s. 13-19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: In this retrospective study we assessed the predictive value of the coronary calcium score for significant (>50%) stenosis relative to conventional risk factors. Methods and Results: We investigated 5515 symptomatic patients from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the USA. All had risk factor assessment, computed tomographic coronary angiogram (CTCA) or conventional angiography and a CT scan for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. 1539 (27.9%) patients had significant stenosis, 5.50 of whom had zero CAC. In 5074 patients, multiple binary regression showed the most important predictor of significant stenosis to be male gender (B = 1.07) followed by diabetes mellitus (B = 0.70) smoking, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, family history of CAD and age but not obesity. When the log transformed CAC score was included, it became the most powerful predictor (B = 1.25), followed by male gender (B = 0.48), diabetes, smoking, family history and age but hypercholesterolaemia and hypertension lost significance. The CAC score is a more accurate predictor of >50% stenosis than risk factors regardless of the means of assessment of stenosis. The sensitivity of risk factors, CAC score and the combination for prediction of >50% stenosis when measured by conventional angiogram was considerably higher than when assessed by CTCA but the specificity was considerably higher when assessed by CTCA. The accuracy of CTCA for predicting >50% stenosis using the CAC score alone was higher (AUC 0.85) than using a combination of the CAC score and risk factors with conventional angiography (AUC 0.81). Conclusion: In symptomatic patients, the CAC score is a more accurate predictor of significant coronary stenosis than conventional risk factors.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
