| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Bennett, Sarah E., et al.
(författare)
-
Assessing acceptability and identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation of the EULAR recommendations for patient education in inflammatory arthritis : a mixed-methods study with rheumatology professionals in 23 European and Asian countries
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81:10, s. 1348-1357
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To disseminate and assess the level of acceptability and applicability of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for patient education among professionals in rheumatology across Europe and three Asian countries and identify potential barriers and facilitators to their application. Methods: A parallel convergent mixed-methods design with an inductive approach was used. A web-based survey, available in 20 different languages, was distributed to health professionals by non-probability sampling. The level of agreement and applicability of each recommendation was assessed by (0-10) rating scales. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were assessed using free-text responses. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and qualitative data by content analysis and presented in 16 categories supported by quotes. Results: A total of 1159 completed the survey; 852 (73.5%) were women. Most of the professionals were nurses (n=487), rheumatologists (n=320), physiotherapists (n=158). For all recommendations, the level of agreement was high but applicability was lower. The four most common barriers to application were lack of time, lack of training in how to provide patient education, not having enough staff to perform this task and lack of evaluation tools. The most common facilitators were tailoring patient education to individual patients, using group education, linking patient education with diagnosis and treatment and inviting patients to provide feedback on patient education delivery.Conclusions: This project has disseminated the EULAR recommendations for patient education to health professionals across 23 countries. Potential barriers to their application were identified and some are amenable to change, namely training patient education providers and developing evaluation tools. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
|
|
| 3. |
- Fernandes, Linda, et al.
(författare)
-
EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 1468-2060 .- 0003-4967. ; 72:7, s. 1125-1135
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The objective was to develop evidence -based recommendations and a research and educational agenda for the non-pharmacological management of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). The multidisciplinary task force comprised 21 experts: nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, rheumatologists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioner, psychologist, dietician, clinical epidemiologist and patient representatives. After a preliminary literature review, a first task force meeting and five Delphi rounds, provisional recommendations were formulated in order to perform a systematic review. A literature search of Medline and eight other databases was performed up to February 2012. Evidence was graded in categories I-IV and agreement with the recommendations was determined through scores from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Eleven evidence-based recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee OA were developed, concerning the following nine topics: assessment, general approach, patient information and education, lifestyle changes, exercise, weight loss, assistive technology and adaptations, footwear and work. The average level of agreement ranged between 8.0 and 9.1. The proposed research agenda included an overall need for more research into non-pharmacological interventions for hip OA, moderators to optimise individualised treatment, healthy lifestyle with economic evaluation and long-term follow-up, and the prevention and reduction of work disability. Proposed educational activities included the required skills to teach, initiate and establish lifestyle changes. The 11 recommendations provide guidance on the delivery of non-pharmacological interventions to people with hip or knee OA. More research and educational activities are needed, particularly in the area of lifestyle changes.
|
|
| 4. |
- Jones, Bethan, et al.
(författare)
-
Disseminating and assessing implementation of the EULAR recommendations for patient education in inflammatory arthritis : a mixed-methods study with patients’ perspectives
- 2022
-
Ingår i: RMD Open. - London : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 2056-5933. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To explore patients’ agreement andreasons for agreement or disagreement with the EULAR recommendations for patient education (PE) for people with inflammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: This mixed-method survey collected data using snowball sampling. The survey had been translated into 20 languages by local healthcare professionals, researchers and patient research partners. It explored the degree towhich patients with IA agreed with each recommendationfor PE (0=do not agree at all and 10=agree completely)and their rationale for their agreement level in free text questions. Descriptive statistics summarised participants’ demographics and agreement levels. Qualitative contentanalysis was used to analyse the free text data. Sixteen subcategories were developed, describing the reasons foragreement or disagreement with the recommendations,which constituted the categories. Results: The sample comprised 2779 participants(79% female), with a mean (SD) age 55.1 (13.1) yearsand disease duration 17.1 (13.3) years. Participants strongly agreed with most recommendations (median10 (IQR: 9–10) for most recommendations). Reasonsfor agreement with the recommendations included thebenefit of using PE to facilitate collaborative care andshared decision making, the value of flexible and tailored PE, and the value of gaining support from other patients.Reasons for disagreement included lack of resources for PE, not wanting informa tion to be tailored by healthcare professionals and a reluctance to use telephone-basedPE. Conclusion: The EULAR recommendations for PE havebeen disseminated among patients with IA. Overall, agreement levels were very high, suggesting that they reflect patients’ preferences for engaging in collaborative clinical care and using PE to facilitate and supplement their own understanding of IA. Reasons for not completely agreeing with the recommendations can inform implementation strategies and education of healthcare professionals. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022.
|
|
