| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Gustavsson, Alexander, et al.
(författare)
-
A test battery for evaluating hop performance in patients with an ACL injury and patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 14:8, s. 778-88
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of hop tests with high ability to discriminate (i.e. high test-retest reliability, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) between the hop performance of the injured and the uninjured side in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Five hop tests were analysed: three maximum single hop tests and two hop tests while developing fatigue. Fifteen healthy subjects performed the five hop tests on three separate occasions in a test-retest design. Thirty patients, mean 11 months after an ACL injury and 35 patients, mean 6 months after ACL reconstruction were tested. ICC values ranged from 0.85 to 0.97 for the five hop tests, indicating that all the tests had high test-retest reliability. Sixty-seven percent to 100% of the healthy subjects had normal symmetry (i.e. <10% side-to-side difference) in the five hop tests. Abnormal symmetry in the five hop tests ranged from 43 to 77% for patients with an ACL injury and from 51 to 86% for patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction respectively. The three tests with the highest ability to discriminate hop performance were chosen for the test battery; they were the vertical jump, the hop for distance and the side hop. The test battery revealed a high level of sensitivity and accuracy in patients with an ACL injury (87 and 84%) and in patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction (91 and 88%), when at least one of the three tests was classified as abnormal. To summarise, the test battery consisting of both maximum single hop performances: the vertical jump and the hop for distance and hop performance while developing fatigue: the side hop, produced high test-retest reliability, sensitivity and accuracy. Further, the test battery produced higher values compared with any of the three hop tests individually revealing that only one out of ten patients had restored hop performance 11 months after an ACL injury and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that this test battery showed a high ability to discriminate between the hop performance of the injured and the uninjured side both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Neeter, Camille, 1968, et al.
(författare)
-
Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 14:6, s. 571-80
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A more sports-specific and detailed strength assessment has been advocated for patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of lower extremity strength tests with high ability to discriminate between leg power development on the injured and uninjured sides in patients after ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Twenty-three patients were tested 6 months after ACL injury and 44 patients were tested 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four of the 44 patients were operated on using a hamstrings graft and 20 patients were operated on using a patellar tendon graft. All the patients performed a test battery of three strength tests for each leg in a randomised order. The three strength tests were chosen to reflect quadriceps and hamstring muscular power in a knee-extension and a knee-flexion test (open kinetic chain) and lower-extremity muscular power in a leg-press test (closed kinetic chain). There was a higher sensitivity for the test battery to discriminate abnormal leg power compared with any of the three strength tests individually. Nine out of ten patients after ACL reconstruction and six out of ten of the patients after ACL injury exhibited abnormal leg power symmetry using the test battery. Thus, this test battery had high ability in terms of discriminating between the leg power performance on the injured and uninjured side, both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that a test battery consisting of a knee-extension, knee-flexion and leg-press muscle power test had high ability to determine deficits in leg power 6 months after ACL injury and reconstruction. Only a minority of the patients had restored leg muscle power. The clinical relevance is that the test battery may contribute to the decision-making process when deciding whether and when patients can safely return to strenuous physical activities after an ACL injury or reconstruction.
|
|
| 8. |
- Thomeé, Roland, 1954, et al.
(författare)
-
Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1433-7347 .- 0942-2056. ; 20:6, s. 1143-1151
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the variability in leg muscle power and hop performance up to 2years among patients following ACL reconstruction and specifically to illustrate the effects of various criteria for an acceptable level of muscle function. METHODS: Eighty-two patients (56 men and 26 women) with a mean age of 28years, who underwent ACL reconstruction using either hamstring tendons (n=46) or a patellar tendon (n=36), were assessed pre-operatively and 3, 6, 12 and 24months post-surgery with a battery of three lower extremity muscle power tests and a battery of three hop tests. RESULTS: Leg symmetry index (LSI) values at group level ranged between 73 and 100% at all follow-ups. When the tests were evaluated individually, patients reached an average LSI of ≥90% at 24months. The success rate at 24months for the muscle power test battery, that is, patients with an LSI of ≥90% in all three tests, was 48 and 44% for the hop test battery. The success rate at 24months for both test batteries on all six muscle function tests was 22%. The criterion of an LSI of ≥80% resulted in 53% of the patients having an acceptable level on all six tests, while with a criterion of an LSI of ≥100%, none of the patients reached an acceptable level. CONCLUSION: At group level and in single muscle function tests, the muscle function outcome 1 and 2years after ACL reconstruction is satisfactory in the present study and on a par with the results presented in the literature. However, when using more demanding criteria for a successful muscle function outcome, using batteries of tests or increasing the acceptable LSI level from ≥90% to ≥95% or ≥100%, the results are considered to be poor. It is suggested that this should be taken into consideration when presenting results after ACL rehabilitation, deciding on the criteria for a safe return to sports, or designing rehabilitation programmes after ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic prospective cohort study, Level I.
|
|
