SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Nelson EC) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Nelson EC)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 30
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Bravo, L, et al. (författare)
  • 2021
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
5.
  • Niemi, MEK, et al. (författare)
  • 2021
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
6.
  • Tabiri, S, et al. (författare)
  • 2021
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Duffy, DL, et al. (författare)
  • Publisher Correction: Novel pleiotropic risk loci for melanoma and nevus density implicate multiple biological pathways
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Nature communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2041-1723. ; 10:1, s. 299-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The original version of this Article contained errors in the spelling of the authors Fan Liu and M. Arfan Ikram, which were incorrectly given as Fan Lui and Arfan M. Ikram. In addition, the original version of this Article also contained errors in the author affiliations which are detailed in the associated Publisher Correction.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Godfrey, Marjorie M., et al. (författare)
  • Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: the coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives.
  • 2014
  • Ingår i: Journal of Nursing Management. - : Hindawi Limited. - 1365-2834 .- 0966-0429. ; 22:4, s. 452-464
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Aim To investigate health care improvement team coaching activities from the perspectives of coachees, coaches and unit leaders in two national improvement collaboratives. Background Despite numerous methods to improve health care, inconsistencies in success have been attributed to factors that include unengaged staff, absence of supportive improvement resources and organisational inertia. Methods Mixed methods sequential exploratory study design, including quantitative and qualitative data from interprofessional improvement teams who received team coaching. The coachees (n = 382), coaches (n = 9) and leaders (n = 30) completed three different data collection tools identifying coaching actions perceived to support improvement activities. Results Coachees, coaches and unit leaders in both collaboratives reported generally positive perceptions about team coaching. Four categories of coaching actions were perceived to support improvement work: context, relationships, helping and technical support. Conclusions All participants agreed that regardless of who the coach is, emphasis should include the four categories of team coaching actions. Implications for nursing management Leaders should reflect on their efforts to support improvement teams and consider the four categories of team coaching actions. A structured team coaching model that offers needed encouragement to keep the team energized, seems to support health care improvement.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 30

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy