| 1. |
- Bruins, Harman M, et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer : a systematic review
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Urology. - : Elsevier. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560. ; 66:6, s. 1065-1077
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- CONTEXT: Controversy exists regarding the therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy (LND) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the relevant literature assessing the impact of LND on oncologic and perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing RC for MIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (LILACS) were searched up to December 2013. Comparative studies reporting on no LND, limited LND (L-LND), standard LND (S-LND), extended LND (E-LND), superextended LND (SE-LND), and oncologic and perioperative outcomes were included. Risk-of-bias and confounding assessments were performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies reporting on 19 793 patients were included. All but one study were retrospective. Planned meta-analyses were not possible because of study heterogeneity; therefore, data were synthesized narratively. There were high risks of bias and confounding across most studies as well as extreme heterogeneity in the definition of the anatomic boundaries of LND templates. All seven studies comparing LND with no LND favored LND in terms of better oncologic outcomes. Seven of 14 studies comparing (super)extended LND with L-LND or S-LND reported a beneficial outcome for (super)extended LND in at least a subset of patients. No difference in outcome was reported in two studies comparing E-LND and S-LND. The comparative harms of different extents of LND remain unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Although the quality of the data was poor, the available evidence indicates that any kind of LND is advantageous over no LND. Similarly, E-LND appears to be superior to lesser degrees of dissection, while SE-LND offered no additional benefits. It is hoped that data from ongoing randomized clinical trials will clarify remaining uncertainties. PATIENT SUMMARY: The current literature suggests that removal of lymph nodes in bladder cancer surgery is beneficial and might result in better outcomes in terms of prolonging survival; however, the quality of the available studies is poor, and high-quality studies are needed.
|
|
| 2. |
- Nishio, Akiyosho, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparative studies of mitochondrial autoantibodies in sera and bile in primary biliary cirrhosis
- 1997
-
Ingår i: Hepatology. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0270-9139 .- 1527-3350. ; 25:5, s. 1085-1089
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterized by destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. Although the pathogenesis of this disease is still unknown, high titers of antimitochondrial autoantibodies (AMA) have long been recognized in patient sera. However, little is known about the presence of AMA in bile. In this study, we investigated bile and sera from patients with PBC and healthy controls for the presence of AMA and mitochondrial autoantigens. AMA were detected in the bile of 17 of 19 patients (89.4%) with PBC; they were specifically directed against the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC-E2) in 15 of 19 patients (78.9%), to the branched-chain 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex E2 (BCOADC-E2) in 6 of 19 patients (31.6%), and to the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex E2 (OGDC-E2) in 1 of 19 patients (5.3%). In a comparative study of sera from the same patients, anti-PDC-E2 antibodies were found in 19 of 19 patients (100%), anti-BCOADC in 9 of 19 patients (47.3%), and anti-OGDC-E2 in 4 of 19 patients (21.1%) patients. AMA in bile were always found together with antibodies of corresponding specificities in the serum from the same patient. Immunoglobulin (Ig)A AMA were found in the bile of 9 of 19 patients (47.7%) with PBC; they were specifically directed against PDC-E2 in 8 of 19 patients (42.1%) and to BCOADC in 2 of 19 patients (10.5%). Epitope mapping of IgA anti-PDC-E2 antibodies indicated that, like serum autoantibodies, the immunodominant epitope is directed against the inner lipoyl domain of PDC-E2. The prevalence and antigen reactivity of IgA AMA in sera correlated completely with IgA AMA in bile. Autoantibodies against nuclear envelope pore proteins (gp210) were found in 1 of 8 (12.5%) sera of patients with PBC, but not in bile. Furthermore, and of particular interest, we detected the autoantigens, PDC-E2, OGDC-E2, and BCOADC-E2, in the bile of 12 of 19 patients (63.2%), 9 of 19 patients (47.4%), and 9 of 19 patients (47.4%), respectively; PDC-E2 was found in only 1 of 17 (5.9%) disease controls. Although the presence of AMA in bile may merely reflect the presence of these antibodies in sera, the simultaneous detection of mitochondrial autoantigens in bile suggests an increase of mitochondrial autoantigens at inflammatory sites. Such autoantigens, coupled with AMA, may augment the local immune response and disease progression.
|
|
