1. |
|
|
2. |
- Forsberg, Eva, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Curriculum Code, Arena, and Context : Curriculum and Leadership Research in Sweden
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Leadership and Policy in Schools. - : Routledge. - 1570-0763 .- 1744-5043. ; 16:2, s. 357-382
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article describes the development of the Swedish curriculum-theory tradition with a focus on different curriculum practices, educational message systems, arenas, and curriculum makers. Attention has been paid to different places, spaces, and times in relation to the selection, ordering, and manifestation of knowledge, norms, and values, as well as the management and organization of education. Curriculum and leadership research and changes in Swedish education are described and we introduce the comparative curriculum code as a codification of the contemporary changes in the education system and their consequences for the selection and ordering of knowledge and students.
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
- Johansson, Olof, 1950-, et al.
(författare)
-
School Boards in Sweden
- 2014
-
Ingår i: School Boards in the Governance Process. - Dordrecht : Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. - 9783319054933 - 9783319054940 ; , s. 67-83
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The school law has strengthened the rights for the pupils and parents not only through the possibility to choose the school but also to test decisions taken by the law in court. The state inspection has a great number of possibilities to act against schools that don’t fulfill the law.When the principal needed support, they gave their demands to the school owner. We call this “under-pressure”. Often the demands are about resources. These negotiations affect the relations between the principal and the school owner, as well as between principals, teachers, and parents who have often been involved.The strong and direct state regulation of the schools, together with a separate system for the allocation of money between states and municipalities, seems to have strengthened the relation between the state and the school and weakened the relation between the schools and the municipality (Nihlfors E, Johansson O, Rektor – en stark länk i styrningen av skolan [The school principal-a strong linkage in school governing]. SNS Förlag, Stockholm, 2013).At the same time, well-educated, dedicated board members with an interest in education work as spare-time politicians and want to make a difference. The communication with the principals is not frequent, and they heavily rely on the information from the superintendent. Also the board members look to the national level and trust the state inspection more than they trust their own evaluations.
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|