SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(O'Neil Adrienne) "

Sökning: WFRF:(O'Neil Adrienne)

  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • O'Neil, Adrienne, et al. (författare)
  • The impact of statins on psychological wellbeing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: BMC Medicine. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1741-7015. ; 10
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: Cholesterol-lowering medications such as statins have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which may be beneficial for treating depression and improving mood. However, evidence regarding their effects remains inconsistent, with some studies reporting links to mood disturbances. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the impact of statins on psychological wellbeing of individuals with or without hypercholesterolemia. Methods: Articles were identified using medical, health, psychiatric and social science databases, evaluated for quality, and data were synthesized and analyzed in RevMan-5 software using a random effects model. Results: The 7 randomized controlled trials included in the analysis represented 2,105 participants. A test for overall effect demonstrated no statistically significant differences in psychological wellbeing between participants receiving statins or a placebo (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.08, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.12; P = 0.42). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to separately analyze depression (n = 5) and mood (n = 2) outcomes; statins were associated with statistically significant improvements in mood scores (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.24). Conclusions: Our findings refute evidence of negative effects of statins on psychological outcomes, providing some support for mood-related benefits. Future studies could examine the effects of statins in depressed populations.
  •  
2.
  • Schweinsberg, Martin, et al. (författare)
  • Same data, different conclusions : Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. - : Elsevier BV. - 0749-5978 .- 1095-9920. ; 165, s. 228-249
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In this crowdsourced initiative, independent analysts used the same dataset to test two hypotheses regarding the effects of scientists' gender and professional status on verbosity during group meetings. Not only the analytic approach but also the operationalizations of key variables were left unconstrained and up to individual analysts. For instance, analysts could choose to operationalize status as job title, institutional ranking, citation counts, or some combination. To maximize transparency regarding the process by which analytic choices are made, the analysts used a platform we developed called DataExplained to justify both preferred and rejected analytic paths in real time. Analyses lacking sufficient detail, reproducible code, or with statistical errors were excluded, resulting in 29 analyses in the final sample. Researchers reported radically different analyses and dispersed empirical outcomes, in a number of cases obtaining significant effects in opposite directions for the same research question. A Boba multiverse analysis demonstrates that decisions about how to operationalize variables explain variability in outcomes above and beyond statistical choices (e.g., covariates). Subjective researcher decisions play a critical role in driving the reported empirical results, underscoring the need for open data, systematic robustness checks, and transparency regarding both analytic paths taken and not taken. Implications for orga-nizations and leaders, whose decision making relies in part on scientific findings, consulting reports, and internal analyses by data scientists, are discussed.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-2 av 2
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (1)
forskningsöversikt (1)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (2)
Författare/redaktör
Liu, Yang (1)
Berk, Michael (1)
Nilsonne, Gustav (1)
van den Akker, Olmo ... (1)
Schweinsberg, Martin (1)
Silberzahn, Raphael (1)
visa fler...
Uhlmann, Eric Luis (1)
Danielsson, Henrik, ... (1)
Miller, David (1)
Robinson, David (1)
Bahník, Štěpán (1)
van Aert, Robbie C. ... (1)
van Assen, Marcel A. ... (1)
Villeseche, Florence (1)
Zandian, Arash (1)
Clark, Michael (1)
Viganola, Domenico (1)
Kane, David (1)
Gnambs, Timo (1)
Schulte-Mecklenbeck, ... (1)
Heer, Jeffrey (1)
Cyrus-Lai, Wilson (1)
Feldman, Michael (1)
Curran, Paul G. (1)
Ropovik, Ivan (1)
Liverani, Silvia (1)
Fox, Nick (1)
Yarkoni, Tal (1)
Madan, Nikhil (1)
Sommer, S. Amy (1)
Murase, Toshio (1)
Protzko, John (1)
Han, Dan (1)
MacDonald, Kyle (1)
Althoff, Tim (1)
Moore, Ben (1)
Moore, Andrew (1)
Pasco, Julie A (1)
Lavbič, Dejan (1)
Madan, Christopher R ... (1)
Mandl, Benjamin (1)
Garrison, S. Mason (1)
Zhang, Leilei (1)
O'Neil, Adrienne (1)
Sanna, Livia (1)
Redlich, Cassie (1)
Sanderson, Kristy (1)
Jacka, Felice (1)
Williams, Lana J. (1)
Otterbacher, Jahna (1)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (1)
Stockholms universitet (1)
Linköpings universitet (1)
Lunds universitet (1)
Handelshögskolan i Stockholm (1)
Karolinska Institutet (1)
Språk
Engelska (2)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Naturvetenskap (1)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (1)
Samhällsvetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy