| 1. |
- Bergquist, Filip, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Parkinson's disease - heterogeneous and complex in its clinical presentation.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205 .- 1652-7518. ; 117
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Lewy bodies with alpha-synuclein as the major component and loss of dopaminergic nerve cells in substantia nigra are neuropathological features. The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease is based on the occurrence of bradykinesia, rigidity and resting tremor. The disease is also associated with several non-motor symptoms. The therapy is mainly based on pharmacological treatment to increase dopamine signaling and neurosurgical deep brain stimulation. The symptoms and signs of the progressive disease change over time, requiring treatment adjustments. Patients should be followed by a physician, nurse and a multidisciplinary team with expertise in Parkinson's disease.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergquist, Filip, et al.
(författare)
-
Parkinsons sjukdom – heterogen och komplex i sitt kliniska uttryck - Individuella kombinationer av symtom som ändrar sig över tid kräver behandlingsjusteringar och anpassningar
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205. ; 117
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Parkinson's disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Lewy bodies with alpha-synuclein as the major component and loss of dopaminergic nerve cells in substantia nigra are neuropathological features. The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease is based on the occurrence of bradykinesia, rigidity and resting tremor. The disease is also associated with several non-motor symptoms. The therapy is mainly based on pharmacological treatment to increase dopamine signaling and neurosurgical deep brain stimulation. The symptoms and signs of the progressive disease change over time, requiring treatment adjustments. Patients should be followed by a physician, nurse and a multidisciplinary team with expertise in Parkinson's disease.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bergquist, Filip, et al.
(författare)
-
Parkinsons sjukdom [Parkinsons disease] : heterogen och komplex i sitt kliniska uttryck [heterogeneous and complex in its clinical presentation]
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - : Sveriges Läkarförbund. - 0023-7205 .- 1652-7518. ; 117
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Parkinsons disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Lewy bodies with alpha-synuclein as the major component and loss of dopaminergic nerve cells in substantia nigra are neuropathological features. The diagnosis of Parkinsons disease is based on the occurrence of bradykinesia, rigidity and resting tremor. The disease is also associated with several non-motor symptoms. The therapy is mainly based on pharmacological treatment to increase dopamine signaling and neurosurgical deep brain stimulation. The symptoms and signs of the progressive disease change over time, requiring treatment adjustments. Patients should be followed by a physician, nurse and a multidisciplinary team with expertise in Parkinsons disease.
|
|
| 4. |
- Bergquist, Filip, et al.
(författare)
-
Pharmacokinetics of Intravenously (DIZ101), Subcutaneously (DIZ102), and Intestinally (LCIG) Infused Levodopa in Advanced Parkinson Disease
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Neurology. - : Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. - 0028-3878 .- 1526-632X. ; 99:10, s. E965-E976
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Objectives Intestinal levodopa/carbidopa gel infusion (LCIG) is superior to oral treatment in advanced Parkinson disease. The primary objective of this trial was to investigate whether continuous subcutaneous or intravenous infusion with a continuously buffered acidic levodopa/carbidopa solution yields steady-state plasma concentrations of levodopa that are equivalent in magnitude, and noninferior in variability, to those obtained with LCIG in patients with advanced Parkinson disease. Methods A concentrated acidic levodopa/carbidopa (8:1) solution buffered continuously and administered intravenously (DIZ101) or subcutaneously (DIZ102) was compared with an approved LCIG in a randomized, 3-period crossover, open-label, multicenter trial. Formulations were infused for 16 hours to patients with Parkinson disease who were using LCIG as their regular treatment. Patients were recruited from several university neurology clinics but came to the same phase I unit for treatment. Pharmacokinetic variables and safety including dermal tolerance are reported. The primary outcomes were bioequivalence and noninferior variability of DIZ101 and DIZ102 vs LCIG with respect to levodopa plasma concentrations. Results With dosing adjusted to estimated bioavailability, DIZ101 and DIZ102 produced levodopa plasma levels within standard bioequivalence limits compared with LCIG in the 18 participants who received all treatments. Although the levodopa bioavailability for DIZ102 was complete, it was 80% for LCIG. Therapeutic concentrations of levodopa were reached as quickly with subcutaneous administration of DIZ102 as with LCIG and remained stable throughout the infusions. Owing to poor uptake of LCIG, carbidopa levels in plasma were higher with DIZ101 and DIZ102 than with the former. All individuals receiving any of the treatments (n = 20) were included in the evaluation of safety and tolerability. Reactions at the infusion sites were mild and transient. Discussion It is feasible to rapidly achieve high and stable levodopa concentrations by means of continuous buffering of a subcutaneously administered acidic levodopa/carbidopa-containing solution.
|
|
| 5. |
- Cedergren Weber, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
The Impact of COVID-19 on Parkinson's Disease : A Case-Controlled Registry and Questionnaire Study on Clinical Markers and Patients' Perceptions
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0001-6314 .- 1600-0404. ; 2023
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease with motor and nonmotor symptoms. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).Objectives: To explore how COVID-19 affects motor, nonmotor, and general health aspects of PD and to map how PD patients perceive their change in symptoms since falling ill with COVID-19.Method: The study was descriptive, case-controlled, and based on both registry and questionnaire data. At baseline, the controls were matched on age, sex, and disease severity. Information on the severity of the disease, nonmotor symptoms, motor symptoms, and general health was retrieved from the Swedish Registry for PD. Registry data from a COVID-19 group (n=45) and a control group (n=73), as well as questionnaires from a COVID-19 group (n=24) and a control group (n=42), were compared.Results: We did not find that SARS-CoV-2 infection affects any major aspect of nonmotor symptoms, motor symptoms, general health, and perception of change in PD patients' post-COVID-19. Compared to controls, the COVID-19 group reported a more positive subjective experience of pain and quality of life and a perception of change post-COVID-19 regarding general motor function, sleep quality, and mood (all p<0.05).Conclusion: Although SARS-CoV-2 infection does not seem to affect PD symptoms in any major respect, the subjective experience of several aspects of life in PD patients might be slightly improved post-COVID-19 compared to a control group. The findings warrant further investigations due to the small sample size and possible survivorship bias.
|
|
| 6. |
- Martinez-Martin, Pablo, et al.
(författare)
-
EuroInf: A Multicenter Comparative Observational Study of Apomorphine and Levodopa Infusion in Parkinson's Disease
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Movement Disorders. - : Wiley. - 0885-3185. ; 30:4, s. 510-516
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (Apo) and intrajejunal levodopa infusion (IJLI) are two treatment options for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and refractory motor complications, with varying cost of treatment. There are no multicenter studies comparing the effects of the two strategies. This open-label, prospective, observational, 6-month, multicenter study compared 43 patients on Apo (48.8% males, age 62.3 +/- 10.6 years; disease duration: 14 +/- 4.4 years; median H & Y stage 3; interquartile range [IQR]: 3-4) and 44 on IJLI (56.8% males, age 62.7 +/- 9.1 years; disease duration: 16.1 +/- 6.7 years; median H & Y stage 4; IQR, 3-4). Cohen's effect sizes (0.8 considered as large) were large with both therapies with respect to total motor, nonmotor, and quality-of-life scores. The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) with Apo showed moderate improvement, whereas sleep/fatigue, gastrointestinal, urinary, and sexual dimensions of the NMSS showed significantly higher improvement with IJLI. Seventy-five percent on IJLI improved in their quality-of-life and nonmotor symptoms (NMS), whereas in the Apo group, a similar proportion improved in quality of life, but 40% in NMS. Adverse effects included peritonitis with IJLI and skin nodules on Apo. Based on this open-label, nonrandomized, comparative study, we report that, in advanced Parkinson's patients, both IJLI and Apo infusion therapy appear to provide a robust improvement in motor symptoms, motor complications, quality-of-life, and some NMS. Controlled, randomized studies are required. (c) 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
|
|
| 7. |
- Angela Cenci-Nilsson, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Oral and infusion levodopa therapy in the management of Parkinson’s disease
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Parkinson's Disease : Current and Future Therapeutics and Clinical Trials - Current and Future Therapeutics and Clinical Trials. - 9781107053861 - 9781107284210 ; , s. 63-75
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: The clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is based on the identification of bradykinesia and at least one additional feature among rigidity, resting tremor and postural instability. These clinical features have been estimated to appear when at least 50% of the nigral dopamine neurons and 70% of putaminal dopamine tissue contents are lost [1]. Dopaminergic imaging suggests that at least 30% of the dopamine storage capacity (measured by 18 F-DOPA uptake) and 50% of putamen dopamine transporters have been lost by the onset of contralateral limb bradykinesia and rigidity [2]. In addition to the above motor symptoms, a number of nonmotor symptoms are associated with PD. These include gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, urological and psychiatric symptoms, as well as problems with vision, pain and sleep [3]. There is general agreement that the typical motor features of PD depend on putaminal dopamine depletion. Indeed, these features respond well to dopaminergic treatments, the most effective being levodopa (l-DOPA), a dopamine precursor that can cross the blood-brain barrier. Treatment with levodopa contributes significantly to improvements in the quality of life of people with PD and increases their expected life length (reviewed in [4]). Moreover, treatment with peroral levodopa is relatively well tolerated and inexpensive [5]. Many of nonmotor symptoms may also respond to levodopa treatment [3]. Because of the above reasons, levodopa is currently considered the “gold standard” for the symptomatic treatment of PD [4, 5]. However, the response to levodopa changes with disease progression, becoming complicated by motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in a majority of patients within a few years. As will be discussed below, these motor complications can become disabling, calling for a reduction in oral levodopa dosage and/or for its replacement with advanced invasive treatments. Moreover, levodopa is poorly effective against clinical features that mainly depend on the degeneration of nondopaminergic systems. These include some nonmotor symptoms as well as motor features that occur in advanced disease stages, such as freezing of gait and falls [6]. In this chapter, we will review the history of levodopa pharmacotherapy in PD, the complications of this therapy, the options currently available to optimize oral treatment with levodopa, and recent advances in developing methods for a more continuous levodopa delivery.
|
|
| 8. |
- Antonini, Angelo, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Device-Aided Therapies on Quality of Life and Off-Time in Advanced Parkinson’s Disease : A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: CNS Drugs. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1172-7047 .- 1179-1934. ; 36:12, s. 1269-1283
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Research comparing levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD) is lacking. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assessed the comparative effectiveness of LCIG, DBS, CSAI and best medical therapy (BMT) in reducing off-time and improving quality of life (QoL) in patients with advanced PD. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational and interventional studies from January 2003 to September 2019. Data extracted at baseline and 6 months were off-time, as reported by diary or Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part IV item 39, and QoL, as reported by Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39/PDQ-8). Bayesian NMA was performed to estimate pooled treatment effect sizes and to rank treatments in order of effectiveness. Results: A total of 22 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria (n = 2063 patients): four RCTs, and 16 single-armed, one 2-armed and one 3-armed prospective studies. Baseline mean age was between 55.5–70.9 years, duration of PD was 9.1–15.3 years, off-time ranged from 5.4 to 8.7 h/day in 9 studies, and PDQ scores ranged from 28.8 to 67.0 in 19 studies. Levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel and DBS demonstrated significantly greater improvement in off-time and QoL at 6 months compared with CSAI and BMT (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the effects of LCIG and DBS, but DBS was ranked first for reduction in off-time, and LCIG was ranked first for improvement in QoL. Conclusions: This NMA found that LCIG and DBS were associated with superior improvement in off-time and PD-related QoL compared with CSAI and BMT at 6 months after treatment initiation. This comparative effectiveness research may assist providers, patients, and caregivers in the selection of the optimal device-aided therapy.
|
|
| 9. |
- Antonini, Angelo, et al.
(författare)
-
Developing consensus among movement disorder specialists on clinical indicators for identification and management of advanced Parkinson’s disease : a multi-country Delphi-panel approach
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Current Medical Research and Opinion. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0300-7995 .- 1473-4877. ; 34:12, s. 2063-2073
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Lack of a global consensus on the definition of advanced Parkinson’s disease (APD) and considerations for timing of device-aided therapies may result in heterogeneity in care. Objectives: To reach consensus among movement disorder specialists regarding key patient characteristics indicating transition to APD and guiding appropriate use of device-aided therapies in the management of PD symptoms. Methods: A Delphi-panel approach was utilized to synthesize opinions of movement disorder specialists and build consensus. Results: A panel was comprised of movement disorder specialists from 10 European countries with extensive experience of treating PD patients (mean =24.8 ± 7.2 years). Consensus on indicators of suspected APD and eligibility for device-aided therapies were based on motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms, and functional impairments. Key indicators of APD included: (i) motor—moderate troublesome motor fluctuations, ≥1 h of troublesome dyskinesia/day, ≥2 h “off” symptoms/day, and ≥5-times oral levodopa doses/day; (ii) non-motor—mild dementia, and non-transitory troublesome hallucinations; (iii) functional impairment—repeated falls despite optimal treatment, and difficulty with activities of daily living. Patients with good levodopa response, good cognition, and <70 years of age were deemed as good candidates for all three device-aided therapies. Patients with troublesome dyskinesia were considered good candidates for both levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). PD patients with levodopa-resistant tremor were considered good candidates for DBS. Conclusion: Identifying patients progressing to APD and suitable for device-aided therapies will enable general neurologists to assess the need for referral to movement disorder specialists and improve the quality of care and patient outcomes.
|
|
| 10. |
- Antonini, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Effect and safety of duodenal levodopa infusion in advanced Parkinson's disease: a retrospective multicenter outcome assessment in patient routine care
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neural Transmission. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0300-9564 .- 1435-1463. ; 120:11, s. 1553-1558
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Duodenal levodopa infusion represents an effective strategy to manage motor and non-motor complications in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, most published clinical series regard small numbers of patients and do not exceed 1 year follow-up. In this multi-national observational cohort study conducted in seven specialised PD clinics and university hospitals we assessed long-term safety and outcome of chronic treatment with intra-duodenal levodopa infusions in a large population of patients with advanced PD. The starting population consisted of 98 treated patients (safety population). We report clinical outcomes of 73 patients with subsequent efficacy assessment(s) (efficacy population) over a follow-up period up to 2 years. Follow-up periods and collection of clinical observations varied based on individual routine care program. At last follow-up there was a significant (p a parts per thousand currency sign 0.05) reduction in duration of "Off" periods as well as dyskinesia duration and severity that was associated with an improvement of quality of life. Twenty three patients (25.3 % of the safety population) withdraw, due to adverse drug reaction (5), procedure and device related events (7), compliance (3) and lack of efficacy (8). The mean duration for last value reported after baseline (LV) was 608 +/- A 292 days (median: 697 days). Our results demonstrate significant and sustained benefit over a long observation period in motor complications and in quality of life following a change from oral pulsatile to continuous levodopa delivery. The relatively large number of withdrawals reflects the current use of duodenal levodopa infusion in very advanced PD patients.
|
|
