| 1. |
- Al-Azawy, Mawahib, et al.
(författare)
-
Premedication and preoperative information reduces pain intensity and increases satisfaction in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation : A randomised controlled study
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Applied Nursing Research. - : Elsevier. - 0897-1897 .- 1532-8201. ; 28:4, s. 268-273
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundPain and discomfort are common during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation.AimsTo compare and evaluate the effect of premedication, standardised preoperative information and preoperative anxiety on pain intensity, drug consumption and patients’ satisfaction.MethodsPreoperative anxiety at baseline, pain intensity during RFA, and patient satisfaction after the procedure were measured in 3 random groups. Group A (n = 20) received standard pain management, group B (n = 20) received premedication and group C (n = 20) received premedication and standardised preoperative information.ResultsPatients in groups B and C experienced less pain intensity (p < 0.001) and needed fewer anxiolytics (p = 0.023) and analgesics (p = 0.031) compared to group A. Patient satisfaction was higher in group C (p = 0.005) compared to group A. Increased preoperative anxiety is related to elevated drug demand (p < 0.05).ConclusionPremedication alone or combined with preoperative information reduces and higher preoperative anxiety increases pain intensity and drug consumption during RFA. Preoperative information improves patient satisfaction.
|
|
| 2. |
- Oterhals, Kjersti, et al.
(författare)
-
Adapting to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve : a phenomenographic study
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Advanced Nursing. - : Wiley. - 0309-2402 .- 1365-2648. ; 69:9, s. 2088-2098
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AimTo describe how patients adapt to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve.BackgroundAortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis is preferred for patients with life expectancy of more than 10 years as they are more durable than bioprosthetic valves. Mechanical valves have some disadvantages, such as higher risk of thrombosis and embolism, increased risk of bleeding related to lifelong oral anticoagulation treatment and noise from the valve.DesignAn explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was employed.MethodsAn explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was applied. Interviews were conducted over 4 months during 2010–2011 with 20 strategically sampled patients, aged 24–74 years having undergone aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis during the last 10 years.FindingsPatients adapted to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve in four ways: ‘The competent patient’ wanted to stay in control of his/her life. ‘The adjusted patient’ considered the implications of having a mechanical aortic valve as part of his/her daily life. ‘The unaware patient’ was not aware of warfarin–diet–medication interactions. ‘The worried patient’ was bothered with the oral anticoagulation and annoyed by the sound of the valve. Patients moved between the different ways of adapting.ConclusionsThe oral anticoagulation therapy was considered the most troublesome consequence, but also the sound of the valve was difficult to accept. Patient counselling and adequate follow-up can make patients with mechanical aortic heart valves more confident and competent to manage their own health. We recommend that patients should participate in a rehabilitation programme following cardiac surgery.
|
|
| 3. |
- Oterhals, Kjersti, et al.
(författare)
-
European cardiac nurses' current practice and knowledge on anticoagulation therapy
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1474-5151 .- 1873-1953. ; 13:3, s. 261-269
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Successful management of warfarin, new anti-thrombotic agents and self-monitoring devices requires that health care professionals effectively counsel and educate patients. Previous studies indicate that health care professionals do not always have the knowledge to provide patients with the correct information.Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate European cardiovascular nurses’ knowledge on the overall management of anticoagulation therapy and examine if this knowledge was influenced by level of education and years in clinical practice.Methods: A questionnaire including 47 items on practice patterns and knowledge on warfarin, new anticoagulants, warfarin-drug and warfarin-food interactions, and self-management of International Normalized Ratio (INR) was distributed to the attendants at a European conference in 2012.Results:The response rate was 32% (n=206), of whom 84% reported having direct patient contact. Warfarin was the most common used oral anticoagulation in daily practice. One third offered their patients both patient self-testing and patient self-management of INR. The mean total score on the knowledge questions was 28±6 (maximum possible score 53). Nurses in direct patient care had a higher mean score (p=0.011). Knowledge on warfarin and medication-interactions were low, but knowledge on warfarin-diet interactions and how to advise patients on warfarin as somewhat better.Conclusion:European cardiac nurses need to improve their knowledge and practice patterns on oral anticoagulation therapy. This area of knowledge is important in order to deliver optimal care to cardiac patients and to minimise adverse effects of the treatment.
|
|
