| 1. |
- D'Hoore, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Circular 'superelastic' compression anastomosis : from the animal lab to clinical practice
- 2008
-
Ingår i: MITAT. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1364-5706 .- 1365-2931. ; 17:3, s. 172-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The recent development of a compression device using shape memory Nitinol technology to create an end-to-end anastomosis has renewed the interest in sutureless anastomotic techniques. A phase II, prospective open label clinical trial was started in May 2007 to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new anastomotic device. Fourty patients who need left colectomy or high anterior resection for either diverticular disease or adenocarcinoma will be recruited in two academic hospitals (Uppsala,Sweden and Leuven, Belgium). Clinical leakage is the primary endpoint. Only preliminary results are available to date as the recruitment is ongoing. The median age of the first ten patients is 57.5 years (44-72). No anastomotic leakage occurred. The median hospital stay was 4.0 days. Only three patients noticed the passage of the ring through the anal canal. By three weeks no ring was sustained in the gastrointestinal tract as was objectified by plain X-ray. First clinical use of this new anastomotic device seems promising. Final results for the total phase II trial are awaited. A prospective randomized trial to compare the efficacy of the EndoCar 28 with conventional stapling should be the next step.
|
|
| 2. |
- Van den Broek, C. B. M., et al.
(författare)
-
Differences in pre-operative treatment for rectal cancer between Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium and the Netherlands
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 40:12, s. 1789-1796
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Several studies have shown remarkable differences in colorectal cancer survival across Europe. Most of these studies lacked information about stage and treatment. In this study we compared short-term survival as well as differences in tumour stage and treatment strategies between five European countries: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, and the Netherlands. For this retrospective cohort study all patients aged 18 years or older and operated on adenocarcinoma of the rectum without distant metastases and diagnosed in 2008 and 2009 were selected in national audit registries from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Differences in pre-operative treatment between the countries were compared using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. One year relative survival and one year relative excess risk of death (RER) were compared between the five countries. Large variation in the use of preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiation was found between the countries. Even though, there was little variation in relative survival between the countries, except Sweden, which had a significant better one year RER of death among the elderly patients after adjustment. The differences in survival are expected to be caused by differences in pen-operative care, selection of patients, and especially management of elderly patients. The effects of preoperative treatment are expected to be seen on long term follow-up.
|
|
| 3. |
- van Gijn, W., et al.
(författare)
-
The EURECCA project : Data items scored by European colorectal cancer audit registries
- 2012
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 38:6, s. 467-471
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: The EURECCA (European Registration of Cancer Care) consortium is currently formed by nine independently founded national colorectal audit registrations, of which most already run for many years. The cumulative experience of EURECCA's participants could be used to identify a 'core dataset' that covers all important aspects needed for high quality auditing and at the same time lacking needless data items that only consumes administrative effort. The aim of this study is to compare the data items used by the nine registries participating in EURECCA to identify a core dataset and explore options for future research. Methods: All colorectal outcome registrations participating in the EURECCA project were asked to supply a list with all the data items they score. Items were scored 'present' if they appeared literally in a registration or in case they could he calculated using other items in the same registration. The definition of a 'shared data item' was that at least eight of the nine participating registries scored the item. Results: The number of registered data items varied between 254 (Belgium) and 83 (Norway). Among the 45 variables were patient data, data about preoperative staging, surgical treatment, pre- or postoperative radio- and/or chemotherapy, and follow-up. Items about tumour recurrence or quality of life were scored too little to become shared data items. Conclusions: A total of 45 items were collected by 8 or more of the participating registries and subsequently met the criteria for a shared data item.
|
|
