| 1. |
- Zackrisson, Björn, et al.
(författare)
-
Two-year results from a Swedish study on conventional versus accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - The ARTSCAN study
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : Elsevier. - 0167-8140 .- 1879-0887. ; 100:1, s. 41-48
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose: Studies on accelerated fractionation (AF) in head and neck cancer have shown increased local control and survival compared with conventional fractionation (CF), while others have been non-conclusive. In 1998 a national Swedish group decided to perform a randomised controlled clinical study of AF. Materials and methods: Patients with verified squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx (except glottic T1-T2, N0) and hypopharynx were included. Patients with prior chemotherapy or surgery were excluded. Patients were randomised to either CF (2Gy/day, 5days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68Gy) or to AF (1.1Gy+2.0Gy/day, 5days/week for 4.5weeks, total dose 68Gy). An extensive quality assurance protocol was followed throughout the study. The primary end point was loco-regional tumour control (LRC) at two years after treatment. RESULTS: The study was closed in 2006 when 750 patients had been randomised. Eighty-three percent of the patients had stages III-IV disease. Forty eight percent had oropharyngeal, 21% laryngeal, 17% hypopharyngeal and 14% oral cancers. There were no significant differences regarding overall survival (OS) or LRC between the two regimens. The OS at two years was 68% for AF and 67% for CF. The corresponding figures for LRC were 71% and 67%, respectively. There was a trend towards improved LRC for oral cancers treated (p=0.07) and for large tumours (T3-T4) (p=0.07) treated with AF. The AF group had significantly worse acute reactions, while there was no significant increase in late effects. Conclusion: Overall the AF regimen did not prove to be more efficacious than CF. However, the trend towards improved results in AF for oral cancers needs to be further investigated.
|
|
| 2. |
- Alwin, Jenny, 1978-, et al.
(författare)
-
Health economic and process evaluation of AT interventions for persons with dementia and their relatives - A suggested assessment model
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Technology and Disability. - 1055-4181. ; 19:2-3, s. 61-71
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- There is growing interest in assistive technology (AT) as a means of enabling participation in everyday activities for persons with dementia and their relatives. Health economic assessment of AT in dementia is of importance due to the consequences of the disease for both patients and relatives and to the high societal costs for dementia care. The aim of this article is to outline a model for assessment of AT interventions for persons with dementia. The model expands existing assessment models as it also includes evaluation of the intervention process. Methodological challenges and possibilities in making health economic assessments, including outcomes and costs, as well as process evaluation, are discussed in the article. © 2007 IOS Press. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Alwin, Jenny, 1978-, et al.
(författare)
-
Teknik för personer med demens : En utvärderingsstudie av teknikintervention för personer med demenssjukdom och deras närstående
- 2008
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna rapport är framtagen av Centrum för utvärdering av medicinsk teknologi (CMT), Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, vid Linköpings universitet på uppdrag av Hjälpmedelsinstitutet. Utvärderingsstudien1 som presenteras i rapporten har gjorts av en intervention som utvecklats inom ramen för projektet ”Teknik och Demens”.Författarna till rapporten vill tacka medarbetare i Teknik och Demensprojektet:Arbetsterapeuter på de kliniska enheterna: Barbro Askenborg, Carina Boström, Ulla Haraldson, Malin Lundberg, Anna Rosshagen, Sofia Starkhammar samt Inger Lindblad från Stockholms sjukhem och Margret Rosenberg från Arbetsterapeuterna primärvården Gästrikland.Medarbetare på FoU-enheterna: Ulla Johansson, Staffan Josephsson och Åke Seiger.Projektledningsgruppen: Susann Forsberg och Ingela Månsson från Hjälpmedelsinstitutet, Inge Dahlenborg från Demensförbundet och Kerstin Lundström från Alzheimerföreningen i Sverige.Vi vill även tacka Magnus Husberg, CMT, för konsultinsatser vad gäller analys och databehandling samt Olle Eriksson, LiU, som rådgivare vad gäller statistiska beräkningar. Tack till alla personer som bidragit med synpunkter på rapporten.Slutligen ett varmt tack till alla deltagare i Teknik och Demensprojektet som under studiens gång besvarat många frågor.Linköping 2008-04-22Jenny Alwin Jan Persson Barbro Krevers
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Cuttini, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff
- 2004
-
Ingår i: Archives of Disease in Childhood. - 0003-9888 .- 1468-2044. ; 89:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To present the views of a representative sample of neonatal doctors and nurses in 10 European countries on the moral acceptability of active euthanasia and its legal regulation. Design: A total of 142 neonatal intensive care units were recruited by census (in the Netherlands, Sweden, Hungary, and the Baltic countries) or random sampling (in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom), 1391 doctors and 3410 nurses completed an anonymous questionnaire (response rates 89% and 86% respectively). Main outcome measure: The staff opinion that the law in their country should be changed to allow active euthanasia "more than now". Results: Active euthanasia appeared to be both acceptable and practiced in the Netherlands, France, and to a lesser extent Lithuania, and less acceptable in Sweden, Hungary, Italy, and Spain. More then half (53%) of the doctors in the Netherlands, but only a quarter (24%) in France felt that the law should be changed to allow active euthanasia "more than now". For 40% of French doctors, end of life issues should not be regulated by law. Being male, regular involvement in research, less than six years professional experience, and having ever participated in a decision of active euthanasia were positively associated with an opinion favouring relaxation of legal constraints. Having had children, religiousness, and believing in the absolute value of human life showed a negative association. Nurses were slightly more likely to consider active euthanasia acceptable in selected circumstances, and to feel that the law should be changed to allow it more than now. Conclusions: Opinions of health professionals vary widely between countries, and, even where neonatal euthanasia is already practiced, do not uniformly support its legalisation.
|
|
