| 1. |
- Mayer, D., et al.
(författare)
-
Complete replacement of open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms by endovascular aneurysm repair : a two-center 14-year experience
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - Philadelphia, USA : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 256:5, s. 688-696
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To present the combined 14-year experience of 2 university centers performing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) on 100% of noninfected ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) over the last 32 months.Background: : Endovascular aneurysm repair for RAAA feasibility is reported to be 20% to 50%, and EVAR for RAAA has been reported to have better outcomes than open repair.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively gathered data on 473 consecutive RAAA patients (Zurich, 295; Örebro, 178) from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2011, treated by an "EVAR-whenever-possible" approach until April 2009 (EVAR/OPEN period) and thereafter according to a "100% EVAR" approach (EVAR-ONLY period).Straightforward cases were treated by standard EVAR. More complex RAAA were managed during EVAR-ONLY with adjunctive procedures in 17 of 70 patients (24%): chimney, 3; open iliac debranching, 1; coiling, 8; onyx, 3; and chimney plus onyx, 2.Results: Since May 2009, all RAAA but one have been treated by EVAR (Zurich, 31; Örebro, 39); 30-day mortality for EVAR-ONLY was 24% (17 of 70). Total cohort mortality (including medically treated patients) for EVAR/OPEN was 32.8% (131 of 400) compared with 27.4% (20 of 73) for EVAR-ONLY (P = 0.376). During EVAR/OPEN, 10% (39 of 400) of patients were treated medically compared with 4% (3 of 73) of patients during EVAR-ONLY. In EVAR/OPEN, open repair showed a statistically significant association with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-7.5; P = 0.004). For patients with no abdominal decompression, there was a higher mortality with open repair than EVAR (adjusted OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9-16.7). In patients with abdominal decompression by laparotomy, there was no difference in mortality (adjusted OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.3-3.7).Conclusions: The "EVAR-ONLY" approach has allowed EVAR treatment of nearly all incoming RAAA with low mortality and turndown rates. Although the observed association of a higher EVAR mortality with abdominal decompression needs further study, our results support superiority and more widespread adoption of EVAR for the treatment of RAAA.
|
|
| 2. |
- Pakeliani, D, et al.
(författare)
-
Improved technique for sheath supported contralateral limb gate cannulation in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
- 2020
-
Ingår i: VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten. - : Hogrefe Publishing Group. - 0301-1526. ; 49:1, s. 39-42
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Summary: Background: To present a technique of sheath supported contralateral limb gate (CLG) cannulation of modular bifurcated stent-graft in endovascular abdominal aortic repair. Materials and methods: After totally percutaneous bilateral femoral access, the 9F introducer sheath is exchanged to a 30 cm 12 fr introducer sheath over a stiff wire contralateral to the intended main stent-graft insertion side and advanced into the aorta below the lowest renal artery. Parallel to the stiff wire within the sheath an additional standard J-tip guidewire with a 5 fr Pigtail angiographic catheter is advanced to the level of the renal arteries. After main body deployment, the 12 fr introducer sheath and J-tip wire with pigtail catheter are retracted until the CLG opening level, maintaining the stiff “buddy” wire in position to support the 12 fr sheath, maintaining its distal opening close to the contralateral gate opening to achieve easy cannulation. Results: Retrospective analysis of video archive from July 2016 to February 2018 evidenced 55 recorded EVAR cases. All CLG cannulations were obtained with Standard J-tip or Terumo Glidewire wires and with Pig-Tail or Berenstein catheters. Technical success was 100 %. Mean fluoroscopy time to accomplish CLG cannulation was 37.6 33 (range 1–105) seconds. The aortic carrefour angulation on coronal axis strongly correlates with cannulation time p = <.001, with longer cannulation time for higher carrefour angulations on coronal axis (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.47). Conclusions: The use of 12 fr sheath with parallel wire introduction technique, appears to be a safe and reliable tool to facilitate CLG cannulation during EVAR procedures.
|
|
| 3. |
- Pecoraro, F, et al.
(författare)
-
Predilation technique with balloon angioplasty to facilitate percutaneous groin access of large size sheath through scar tissue
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Vascular. - : SAGE Publications. - 1708-539X .- 1708-5381. ; 25:4, s. 396-401
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Percutaneous remote access for endovascular aortic repair is an advantageous alternative to open access. Previous surgery in the femoral region and the presence of synthetic vascular grafts in the femoral/iliac arteries represent major limitations to percutaneous remote access. The aim of this study was to evaluate an original technique used for enabling percutaneous remote access for thoracic or abdominal endovascular aortic repair in patients with scar tissue and/or a vascular graft in the groin. Methods Twenty-five consecutive patients with a thoracic (11/25; 44%) or an aortic aneurysm (14/25; 66%) and with a synthetic vascular graft in the groin (16/25; 64%) or a redo groin access (9/25; 36%) were managed through the percutaneous remote access. In all patients, a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon was used to predilate the scar tissue and the femoral artery or the synthetic vascular graft after preclosing (ProGlide®; Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In 10 patients, requiring a 20 Fr sheath, a 6 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon was used; and in the remaining 15, requiring a 24 Fr sheath, an 8 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon. Preclosing was exclusively performed using ProGlide®. Mean follow-up was 15 months. Results In all cases, stent-graft deployment was successful. There was one surgical conversion (4%; 1/25) due to bleeding from a femoral anastomosis. Two cases required additional percutaneous maneuvers (postclosing with another system in one patient and endoluminal shielding with stent-graft in the other patient). No pseudoaneurysm or access complication occurred during the follow-up. Conclusions Percutaneous access in redo groins with scar tissue and/or synthetic vascular graft using ultrasound-guided punction, preclosing with ProGlide® system and predilation with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty balloon to introduce large size sheath as used for endovascular aortic repair showed to be feasible, safe and with few local complications.
|
|
| 4. |
- Steuer, Johnny, et al.
(författare)
-
Distinction between Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection : Is there a Sub-acute Phase?
- 2013
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 45:6, s. 627-631
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES:This study aims to assess the relevance of the definition of acute dissection, to analyse whether there is a sub-acute phase and to determine early outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in acute complicated type B aortic dissection.DESIGN:Dual-centre consecutive case series.MATERIALS:Between 1999 and 2011, 102 patients underwent TEVAR for non-traumatic acute complicated type B dissection in Zurich, Switzerland, and Uppsala, Sweden. In addition, 22 patients treated for an acute dissection-related complication occurring >14 days after onset of symptoms were included. Median age was 68 years, 35% were women.METHODS:Demographic, procedural and outcome data were collected prospectively. The patients were followed up on 1 January 2012.RESULTS:In the 22 sub-acute patients (18%), there were no early deaths or neurological complications. The predominant complication in these patients was rapid aortic enlargement, whereas rupture was more prevalent in patients treated within 14 days. In total, there were nine (7%) early deaths, three (2%) post-intervention paraplegias and six cases of stroke (5%).CONCLUSIONS:TEVAR was performed with low early mortality and few neurological complications. A significant proportion of patients presented with acute complications >14 days after onset of symptoms, indicative of a sub-acute phase in the transition between acute and chronic dissection, questioning the relevance of the current definition.
|
|
| 5. |
- Steuer, Johnny, et al.
(författare)
-
Editor's Choice - Durability of Endovascular Repair in Blunt Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Injury : Long-Term Outcome from Four Tertiary Referral Centers
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 50:4, s. 460-465
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To analyze the early and long-term survival and re-intervention rate in patients undergoing TEVAR for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury. Methods: This was a consecutive case series. Between the years 2001 and 2010, a total of 74 patients underwent TEVAR for blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury at four tertiary referral centers, three in Sweden and one in Switzerland. The median age of the patients was 41 years, and 16% were women. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data were collected and reviewed retrospectively. The patients were followed up during 2013-2014. Results: Early (30 day) mortality was 9% (7 patients), with only two cases directly related to the aortic injury; in hospital mortality was 14% as three patients died during the primary hospital admission within the first 6 months. Most patients had sustained severe injuries to other organ systems, and among all in hospital deaths brain injury was the predominant cause. Five year survival in the whole group was 81%. Re-intervention was needed in 16% (12 patients) during the first year, half of them within the first month. Only one patient underwent re-intervention more than 1 year after the initial procedure. Infolding and partial stentgraft collapse was the reason for the secondary procedure in five of the 13 patients; in three it occurred within 3 weeks of the acute TEVAR. Conclusion: TEVAR allows rapid and effective therapy in trauma patients with blunt aortic injury. The outcome is dependent on the severity of the concomitant injuries. The treatment is durable during the first decade after the procedure, but even longer follow up is needed to determine the impact of TEVAR in young patients on the degenerative changes that take place in the aging aorta.
|
|
