| 1. |
- Mauri, Davide, et al.
(författare)
-
Cancer pain ... who cares? : International and national patterns of evidence-based global guide-lines recommendations for physicians on the Web (2011 vs. 2018)
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of B.U.ON. (JBUON). - 1107-0625 .- 2241-6293. ; 25:1, s. 62-73
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Although pain is a common event during treatment of cancer, its assessment and management remains suboptimal in everyday clinical practice at global level.Methods: Considering both the important role of Internet in daily life and that clinical guidelines are important for translating evidence in clinical practice, we performed a prospective study to scrutinize the magnitude of updated evidence-based cancer-pain guideline recommendation for physicians on the web. Changes over-time at a global level were scrutinized at two time points: 2011 for baseline and 2018 at first follow-up. Both anesthesiology and oncology societies were analyzed.Results: In 2011 we scrutinized 181,00 WebPages and 370 eligible societies were identified; 364 of these were eligible for analyses both in 2011 and 2018. The magnitude of cancer pain updated and evidence-based guideline recommendations on the web for health care providers was extremely low at global level and at any time point considered 1.1% (4/364) in 2011 and 4.7% (17364) in 2018. Continental and intercontinental patterns, National's highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence cancer pain web-guideline provision. In 2018, pain & supportive care societies provided the highest rate of updated evidence-based cancer-pain guidelines for clinicians. Only 3/25 medical oncology societies and 1/34 radiation oncology societies, provided own or e-link (to other societies) evidence-based guidelines in their websites.Conclusions: Major medical oncology and radiation oncology societies - at global level - fail to produce updated cancer pain recommendations for their physicians, with most of these providing no or inconsistent or outdated guidelines.
|
|
| 2. |
- Mauri, Davide, et al.
(författare)
-
Facing internet fake-medicine and web para-pharmacy in the total absence of official recommendations from medical societies
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology. - : BAKIS Productions LTD. - 2241-6293. ; 24:4, s. 1314-1325
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Internet fake information, parapharmacy and counterfeit drugs are a market of hundreds of billion dollars. Misleading internet data decrease patients' compliance to medical care, promote use of questionable and detrimental practices, and jeopardize patient outcome. This is particularly harmful among cancer patients, especially when pain and nutritional aspects are considered. Provision of Web recommendations for the general audience (patients, relatives, general population) from official medical-providers might be useful to outweigh the detrimental internet information produced by non-medical providers.METHODS: 370 oncology and anesthesiology related societies were analyzed. Our objective was to evaluate the magnitude of web-recommendation for cancer cachexia and cancer pain for the general audience provided by official medical organizations' web sites at global level.RESULTS: Magnitude of web-recommendations at global level was surprisingly scant both for coverage and consistency. Seven official medical societies provided updated web-recommendation for cancer cachexia to their patients/family members, and 15 for cancer pain. Scantiness was unrelated by continent, developmental index, oncology tradition, economic-geographic area and society type scrutinized.CONCLUSIONS: Patients need expert advice when exposed to fake internet information largely dominated by paramedical market profits. In this era of "new media" the patients' net-education represents a new major educational challenge for medical societies.
|
|
| 3. |
- Mauri, Davide, et al.
(författare)
-
Global coverage and consistency of guideline recommendations for cancer cachexia on the Web in 2011 and 2018
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Contemporary Oncology / Wspólczesna Onkologia. - : Termedia Publishing House. - 1428-2526. ; 23:2, s. 100-109
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Cancer cachexia is a common associate of cancer and has a negative impact on both patients' quality of life and overall survival. Nonetheless its management remains suboptimal in clinical practice. Provision of medical recommendations in websites is of extreme importance for medical decision making and translating evidence into clinical practice.Aim of the study: To scrutinize the magnitude, consistency and changes over time of cancer-cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web among oncology related societies. Intercontinental, continental, national and socioeconomic variations were further analyzed.Material and methods: Web identification of oncology related societies and prospective analyses of relative Web guideline recommendations for physicians on cancer-cachexia at different time-points.Results: In June 2011, we scrutinized 144,000 Web pages. We identified 275 societies, of which 270 were eligible for analyses: 67 were international (African, American, Asian, European, Oceania and Intercontinental), 109 belonged to the top 10 countries with the highest development index and 94 pertained to 10 countries with a long lasting tradition in medical oncology.Conclusions: The magnitude of cancer cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web at a global level was scant both for coverage and consistency, and at any time-point considered: 3.7% (10/270) in 2011 and 8.1% (22/270) in 2018. The proportion of societies giving evidence-based and updated recommendations for cancer cachexia for physicians was only 1.1% (3/270) in 2011 and 2.96% (8/270) in 2018. Continent, national highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence Web guideline provision.
|
|
| 4. |
- Valachis, Antonis, et al.
(författare)
-
Adjuvant Therapy With Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Breast Cancer : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- 2013
-
Ingår i: The Oncologist. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1083-7159 .- 1549-490X. ; 18:4, s. 353-361
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. The purpose of the study was to estimate the impact on survival and fracture rates of the use of zoledronic acid versus no use (or delayed use) in the adjuvant treatment of patients with early-stage (stages I-III) breast cancer. Materials and Methods. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Trials were located through PubMed, ISI, Cochrane Library, and major cancer scientific meeting searches. All trials that randomized patients with primary breast cancer to undergo adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid versus nonuse, placebo, or delayed use of zoledronic acid as treatment to individuals who develop osteoporosis were considered eligible. Standard meta-analytic procedures were used to analyze the study outcomes. Results. Fifteen studies were considered eligible and were further analyzed. The use of zoledronic acid resulted in a statistically significant better overall survival outcome (five studies, 6,414 patients; hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.94). No significant differences were found for the disease-free survival outcome (seven studies, 7,541 patients; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.06) or incidence of bone metastases (seven studies, 7,543 patients; odds ratio[OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.64-1.37). Treatment with zoledronic acid led to a significantly lower overall fracture rate (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96). Finally, the rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw was 0.52%. Conclusion. Zoledronic acid as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients appears to not only reduce the fracture risk but also offer a survival benefit over placebo or no treatment.
|
|
| 5. |
- Valachis, Antonis, et al.
(författare)
-
Cardiac toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with dual HER2 blockade
- 2013
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cancer. - : Wiley. - 0020-7136 .- 1097-0215. ; 133:9, s. 2245-2252
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although dual HER2 blockade shows promising results in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer it is unclear whether this treatment strategy increases the risk for cardiac adverse events. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to investigate the risk of cardiac adverse events when a combination of anti-HER2 therapies compared to anti-HER2 monotherapy. We searched Medline, the Cochrane library, as well as the electronic abstract databases of the major international congresses' proceedings to identify randomized trials that evaluated the administration of anti-HER2 monotherapy (lapatinib or trastuzumab or pertuzumab) versus anti-HER2 combination (pertuzumab plus trastuzumab or trastuzumab plus lapatinib) therapy in breast cancer. The trials were considered eligible if the only systematic difference between the study arms was the type of anti-HER2 therapy used. Study outcomes were the congestive heart failure (CHF) grade 3 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline <50% or more than 10% from baseline. Six trials were considered eligible. Overall incidence results for CHF in the combined anti-HER2 therapy and the anti-HER2 monotherapy were 0.88% (95% CI: 0.47-1.64%) and 1.49% (95% CI: 0.98-2.23%). The incidence of LVEF decline was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.2-4.4%) and 2.9% (95% CI: 2.1-4.1%), respectively. The OR of CHF between anti-HER2 combination and monotherapy was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.26-1.27, p-value= 0.17) while the OR of LVEF decline was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.53-1.48, p-value= 0.64). This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting comparable cardiac toxicity between anti-HER2 combination therapy and anti-HER2 monotherapy. What's new? Breast cancers caused by HER2 overexpression generally have poor prognosis. Drugs targeting the HER2 receptor can thwart the cancer, but also increase the risk of heart problems. New treatments are coming along which combine two anti-HER2 agents for an even greater anticancer effect, but will these dual therapies cause worse cardiac effects? In this report, the authors collected data from trials comparing dual anti-HER2 therapy with anti-HER2 monotherapy, and specifically looked at risk of cardiac side effects. They conclude that doubling up on anti-HER2 drugs did not increase the cardiac toxicity compared with the use of anti-HER2 drugs individually.
|
|
| 6. |
- Valachis, Antonis, et al.
(författare)
-
Role of Zoledronate in Aromatase Activity Should Be Considered in Future Studies In Reply
- 2013
-
Ingår i: The Oncologist. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1083-7159 .- 1549-490X. ; 18:8, s. E26-E27
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Our meta-analysis provides evidence that zoledronic acid in the adjuvant breast cancer setting may increase survival. Additional data from basic research and clinical trials in the future will help us interpret its role with more confidence.
|
|
