| 1. |
- Park, Jennifer, et al.
(författare)
-
A Comparison of Liver MRI and Contrast-Enhanced CT as Standard Workup Before Treatment for Rectal Cancer in Usual Care - A Retrospective Study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Current Medical Imaging. - : Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.. - 1573-4056. ; 18:2, s. 256-262
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The liver is the most common site for rectal cancer metastases. Recommended standard pre-treatment workups have involved Computed Tomography (CT) for abdominal metastases, however, few hospitals have replaced this with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare MRI with CT as an index examination of the liver in the pre-treatment workup in usual care. The primary endpoint was the need for supplementary liver investigations. Methods: Consecutive patients from two hospitals during 2013-2015 were identified in the Regional Swedish Colorectal Cancer Register and included in this retrospective study. Hospital records and radiology reports were reviewed. Inconclusive reports were re-evaluated by two radiologists. Results: A total of 320 patients were included, and 293 were available for analysis. Some 175 and 118 patients had undergone CT and MRI respectively, as their index pre-treatment liver examination. Thirty-four (19.4%) in the CT group and 6 (5.1%) patients in the MRI group underwent supplementary liver investigation due to inconclusive index examination (RR 3.82, 95% CI: 1.66; 8.81, p=0.0017). Median time (q1; q3) from index examination to start of treatment was 50 (36; 68) days in the CT group and 34 (27; 45) days in the MRI group. Conclusion: This retrospective study of two modalities within usual care found that MRI of the liver as index radiological workup before treatment for rectal cancer was associated with fewer supplementary liver investigations and a shorter time to start of treatment. Based on these findings, a prospective trial should be undertaken before implementing MRI as a standard. © 2022 Bentham Science Publishers.
|
|
| 2. |
- Samuelsson, Andreas, 1977, et al.
(författare)
-
Functional Outcomes of Emergency Surgery for Perforated Diverticulitis, Hinchey Grade III
- 2023
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0364-2313 .- 1432-2323. ; 47:6, s. 1570-1582
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Laparoscopic lavage as a treatment for perforated diverticulitis, Hinchey III, has been found safe and feasible in randomized trials. A few studies have reported functional outcomes and quality of life as secondary outcomes. This study investigated distress associated with dysfunction of the bowel or stoma, functional outcomes, and quality of life 2–3years after surgery in a national unselected cohort. Methods: All patients in Sweden who underwent emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis (2016–2018) were invited to answer a comprehensive, study-specific questionnaire 2–3years after the index surgery. Results: Out of 499 potential patients, 226 returned the questionnaire, and 209 were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between laparoscopic lavage and resection in distress associated with dysfunction of the bowel or stoma (odds ratio [OR], 1.32 [95% CI, 0.91–1.92]; p = 0.015). Bowel dysfunction measured by the LARS score was significantly higher for the lavage group (OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.11–2.45]), while stoma was more frequent after resection surgery (40 vs 6%). Conclusions: Patients experienced long-term distress from bodily dysfunction after emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis regardless of the technique used. Regular follow-up could benefit these patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Samuelsson, Andreas, 1977, et al.
(författare)
-
Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis in the LapLav study: population-based registry study.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: The British journal of surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1365-2168 .- 0007-1323. ; 108:10, s. 1236-1242
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The standard treatment for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis with peritonitis was resection with or without a stoma, but recent trials have shown that laparoscopic lavage is a reasonable alternative. This registry-based Swedish study investigated results at a national level to assess safety in real-world scenarios.Patients in Sweden who underwent emergency surgery for perforated diverticulitis between 2016 and 2018 were studied. Inverse probability weighting by propensity score was used to adjust for confounding factors.A total of 499 patients were included in this study. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with a significantly lower 90-day Comprehensive Complication Index (20.9 versus 32.0; odds ratio 0.77, 95 per cent compatibility interval (c.i.) 0.61 to 0.97) and overall duration of hospital stay (9 versus 15days; ratio of means 0.84, 95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.96) compared with resection. Patients had 82 (95 per cent c.i. 39 to 140) per cent more readmissions following lavage than resection (27.2 versus 21.0 per cent), but similar reoperation rates. More co-morbidity was noted among patients who underwent resection than those who had laparoscopic lavage.Laparoscopic lavage is safe in routine care beyond trial evaluations.
|
|
| 4. |
- Angenete, Eva, 1972, et al.
(författare)
-
Ostomy function after abdominoperineal resection-a clinical and patient evaluation.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International journal of colorectal disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1432-1262 .- 0179-1958. ; 27:10, s. 1267-74
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer results in a permanent colostomy. As a consequence of a recent change in operative technique from standard (S-APR) to extralevator resection (E-APR), the perineal part of the procedure is now performed with the patient in a prone jackknife position. The impact of this change on stoma function is unknown. The aim was to determine stoma-related complications and the individual patient experience of a stoma. METHODS: Consecutive patients with rectal cancer operated on with APR in one institution in 2004 to 2009 were included. Recurrent cancer, palliative procedures, pre-existing stoma and patients not alive at the start of the study were excluded. Data were collected from hospital records and the national colorectal cancer registry. A questionnaire was sent out to patients. The median follow-up was 44months (13-84) after primary surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were alive in February 2011. Seventy seven agreed to participate. Sixty-nine patients (90%) returned the questionnaire. Stoma necrosis was more common for E-APR, 34% vs. 10%, but bandaging problems and low stoma height were more common for S-APR. There were no differences in the patients' experience of stoma function. In all, 35% of the patients felt dirty and unclean, but 90% felt that they had a full life and could engage in leisure activities of their choice. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study indicates no difference in stoma function after 1year between S-APR and E-APR. Over 90% of the patients accept their stoma, but our study indicates that more information and support for patients are warranted.
|
|
| 5. |
- Asplund, Dan, et al.
(författare)
-
Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: International journal of colorectal disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1432-1262 .- 0179-1958. ; 30:11, s. 1563-1570
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Short-term complications related to the perineal wound after abdominoperineal excision (APE) are a well-known problem. Perineal morbidity in the longer term is an almost unexplored area. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the prevalence of perineal symptoms 3years after APE for rectal cancer, to identify potential risk factors and to explore the relationship between perineal morbidity and global quality of life.
|
|
| 6. |
- Bock, David, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Do negative intrusive thoughts at diagnosis predict impaired quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety 3, 12 and 24 months after radical prostatectomy?–a longitudinal study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Urology. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 54:3, s. 220-226
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To evaluate the effect of intrusive thoughts at diagnosis on quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety up to two years after radical prostatectomy. Method: The Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) trial was a prospective, longitudinal multicenter study of 4003 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Questionnaire data were collected preoperatively, at 3, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Results: The group of patients with intrusive thoughts at diagnosis had a statistically significant higher postoperative prevalence of impaired quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety as compared with the group of patients with no or minor intrusive thoughts. The highest risk increase for impaired QoL, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety ≥1/week was at 12, 3 and 3 months, respectively, where the three outcomes increased by 38% (RR: 1.38; 95%CI: 1.27–1.49)), 136% (RR: 2.36; 95%CI: 1.74–3.19)) and 165% (RR: 2.65; 95%CI: 2.22–3.17)), respectively. Conclusions: The demonstrated link between intrusive thoughts and quality of life, depressed mood and waking up with anxiety deliver is further evidence to the idea that intrusive thoughts has potential as an endpoint for assessing and predicting psychological distress among men with prostate cancer diagnosis. Trial registration number: ISRCTN06393679 (www.isrctn.com). Date of registration: 07/02/2008. Retrospectively registered. © 2020, © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
|
|
| 7. |
- Correa-Marinez, Adiela, et al.
(författare)
-
Stoma-related symptoms in patients operated for rectal cancer with abdominoperineal excision.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: International journal of colorectal disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1432-1262 .- 0179-1958. ; 31:3, s. 635-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The primary aim of this study was to characterize the frequency, severity, and distress of symptoms from the colostomy and colostomy acceptance in rectal cancer patients. The secondary aims were to study the symptomatic parastomal herniation, its relationship to stoma-related symptoms, and potential risk factors for the development of symptomatic parastomal herniation.
|
|
| 8. |
- Ellegård, Lisa, et al.
(författare)
-
Case Report Fournier’s gangrene under SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy: A literature review and case report
- 2020
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Surgery Case Reports. - : Elsevier BV. - 2210-2612. ; 77, s. 692-694
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction Fournier’s gangrene is a rare, life-threatening necrotizing infection of the perineum. In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning regarding a possible connection between Fournier’s gangrene and new oral anti-diabetic drugs called SGLT-2 inhibitors. There are only a few published case reports of Fournier’s gangrene in patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and a total of 55 patients reported by the FDA to date. Presentation of case We report a case of Fournier’s gangrene in a patient with multiple risk factors, including diabetes type 2, smoking, obesity and immunosuppression. Discussion Further studies are needed to determine whether or not it is the SGLT-2 inhibitor itself that increases the risk of Fournier’s gangrene, or the fact that the patients receiving this kind of drug is a subgroup of patients with multiple risk factors. Conclusion New oral anti-diabetic drugs, SGLT-2 inhibitors, may be associated with Fournier’s gangrene. Surgeons should become suspicious when patients with diabetes present with perineal symptoms.
|
|
| 9. |
- Jansson Timan, Terje, et al.
(författare)
-
Mortality following emergency laparotomy: a Swedish cohort study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Bmc Surgery. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2482. ; 21:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a central, high-risk procedure in emergency surgery. Patients in need of an EL present an acute pathology in the abdomen that must be operated on in order to save their lives. Usually, the underlying condition produces an affected physiology. The perioperative management of this critically ill patient group in need of high-risk surgery and anaesthesia is challenging and related to high mortality worldwide. However, outcomes in Sweden have yet to be studied. This retrospective cohort study explores the perioperative management and outcome after 710 ELs by investigating mortality, overall length of stay (LOS) in hospital, need for care at the intensive care unit (ICU), surgical complications and a general review of perioperative management. Methods Medical records after laparotomy was retrospectively analysed for a period of 38 months (2014-2017), the emergency cases were included. Children (< 18 years), aortic surgery, second look and other expected reoperations were excluded. Demographic, management and outcome data were collected after an extensive analysis of the cohort. Results A total of 710 consecutive operations, representing 663 patients, were included in the cohort (mean age 65.6 years). Mortality (30 days/1 year) after all operations was 14.2% and 26.6% respectively. The mean LOS in hospital was 12 days, while LOS in the ICU was five days. Of all operations, 23.8% patients were admitted at any time to the ICU postoperatively and the 30-day mortality seen among ICU patients was 37.9%. Mortality was strongly correlated to existing comorbidity, high ASA classification, ICU care and faecal peritonitis. The mean/median time from notification to operate until the first incision was 3:46/3:02 h and 87% of patients had their first incision within 6 h of notification. Conclusions In this present Swedish study, high mortality and morbidity were observed after emergency laparotomy, which is in agreement with other recent studies. Trial registration: The study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03549624, registered 8 June 2018).
|
|
| 10. |
- Jansson Timan, Terje, et al.
(författare)
-
One-year mortality rates after standardized management for emergency laparotomy: results from the Swedish SMASH study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 2474-9842. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Patients who require an emergency laparotomy suffer from high mortality and morbidity rates. Studies have shown that the standardization of perioperative management reduces complications in the short term. The aim of the present study was to report long-term mortality rates for the SMASH (Standardized perioperative Management of patients operated with acute Abdominal Surgery in a High-risk and emergency setting) study, as well as short- and long-term outcomes for different age groups within the SMASH study. Methods: A prospective intervention study was introduced in 2018, with the aim of investigating the introduction of a standardized protocol for emergency laparotomy. For 42 months, intervention patients were managed according to the protocol and outcomes were then compared with those of historical controls. Results: A total of 1344 unique patients were included (681 in the intervention group and 663 in the control group). The 90-day mortality rate was 14.1 per cent in the intervention group and 20.8 per cent in the control group (P = 0.002) and the 1-year mortality rate in adjusted analyses was 19.7 and 27.8 per cent respectively (P =< 0.001). An age-related subgroup analysis showed that the oldest patients (76 years and older, 260 in the intervention group and 240 in the control group) had a 1-year mortality rate of 29.6 and 43.8 per cent respectively (P = 0.004) and a mean duration of hospital stay of 9.9 and 11.6 days respectively (P = 0.027). Among older adults (61-75 years), the mean duration of hospital stay was 11.7 days in the intervention group compared with 15.1 days in the control group (P = 0.009) and the mean duration of ICU care was reduced to 4.49 days compared with 7.29 days (P = 0.046). Conclusion: The standardized protocol associated with an emergency laparotomy appears to be beneficial, even in the long term. For elderly patients, it appears to reduce mortality rates and the durations of hospital stay and ICU care.
|
|
