| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Antinori, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Neurology. ; 69:18, s. 1789-99
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 1991, the AIDS Task Force of the American Academy of Neurology published nomenclature and research case definitions to guide the diagnosis of neurologic manifestations of HIV-1 infection. Now, 16 years later, the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke have charged a working group to critically review the adequacy and utility of these definitional criteria and to identify aspects that require updating. This report represents a majority view, and unanimity was not reached on all points. It reviews our collective experience with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), particularly since the advent of highly active antiretroviral treatment, and their definitional criteria; discusses the impact of comorbidities; and suggests inclusion of the term asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment to categorize individuals with subclinical impairment. An algorithm is proposed to assist in standardized diagnostic classification of HAND.
|
|
| 3. |
- Price, R. W., et al.
(författare)
-
Biomarkers of HIV-1 CNS infection and injury
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Neurology. ; 69:18, s. 1781-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- While it is clear that HIV-1 can cause CNS dysfunction, current approaches to classification and diagnosis of this dysfunction rely on syndromic definitions or measures of abnormality on neuropsychological testing in the background context of HIV-1 infection. These definitions have been variably applied, offer only limited sensitivity or specificity, and do not easily distinguish active from static brain injury. Supplanting or augmenting these approaches with objective biologic measurements related to underlying disease processes would provide a major advance in classification, diagnosis, epidemiology, and treatment assessment. Two major avenues are now actively pursued to this end: 1) analysis of soluble molecular markers in CSF and, to a lesser degree, in blood, and 2) neuroimaging markers using anatomic, metabolic, and functional measurements. This review considers the rationale and prospects of these approaches.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Thompson, Robin N., et al.
(författare)
-
Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences. - : The Royal Society. - 0962-8452 .- 1471-2954. ; 287:1932
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Combinations of intense non-pharmaceutical interventions (lockdowns) were introduced worldwide to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Many governments have begun to implement exit strategies that relax restrictions while attempting to control the risk of a surge in cases. Mathematical modelling has played a central role in guiding interventions, but the challenge of designing optimal exit strategies in the face of ongoing transmission is unprecedented. Here, we report discussions from the Isaac Newton Institute 'Models for an exit strategy' workshop (11-15 May 2020). A diverse community of modellers who are providing evidence to governments worldwide were asked to identify the main questions that, if answered, would allow for more accurate predictions of the effects of different exit strategies. Based on these questions, we propose a roadmap to facilitate the development of reliable models to guide exit strategies. This roadmap requires a global collaborative effort from the scientific community and policymakers, and has three parts: (i) improve estimation of key epidemiological parameters; (ii) understand sources of heterogeneity in populations; and (iii) focus on requirements for data collection, particularly in low-to-middle-income countries. This will provide important information for planning exit strategies that balance socio-economic benefits with public health.
|
|
