| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Rönn, Magnus, 1950-, et al.
(författare)
-
Key concepts, Criteria and Quality Judgment in Architecture
- 2007
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This article deals with issues related to theory/practice and professionals/layman in architectural competitions. The data is based from experience in Finland. Architectural competitions have been institutionalized since the end of the 19:th century and they are an important part of the architect’s profession. Despite this, there are few scientific studies made on this topic. Due to this, we hade done an Investigative survey in Finland.The article is based on interviews, studies of competition material and literature. A special follow-up has been made on the competitions held during the years of 1999 and 2000; to get a picture of to what degree the winning competition proposals have been implemented. Seven persons with first hand experience from competitions have been interviewed. They represent the architect’s organization, the arranger and the competitors.The presentation of the results from the completed interviews follows the different stages in the competition process. From the initial stage of bringing forward a competition programme for the task, through the judging of the entries into the final stage of presentation of an opinion from the jury. The task of the jury in architectural competitions is to find the best proposal among the entries. The judgement of the entries is a process where the jury appoint good proposals. Competence and consensus are two essential factors that make the jury feel comfortable in the final choice of a winner of an architectural competition.
|
|
| 5. |
-
AESTHETICS – THE UNEASY DIMENSION IN ARCHITECTURE
- 2016
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- This anthology is the proceedings publication from the 2013 NAF Symposium "Aesthetics, the Uneasy Dimension in Architecture". Suggesting that critical discussion on aesthetics in architecture and architectural discourse has become marginalized or almost non-existent at many universities and schools of architecture, the symposium wished to address this matter and what it means to architecture and our notion of it. In a self-reflexive manner, it also wished to explore how this influences architectural research and the way architectural research is carried out in different research contexts. Editors: Anne Elisabeth Toft and Magnus Rönn Contributing authors: Jonas E. Andersson, Minna Chudoba, Hege Charlotte Faber, Ævar Hardarson, Iida Kalakoski, Magnus Rönn, Anne Elisabeth Toft and Leif Östman
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Andersson, Jonas E., et al.
(författare)
-
Architectural competitions I : Exploring the phenomenon of competing in architecture and urban design
- 2013
-
Ingår i: FORMakademisk. - Oslo. - 1890-9515. ; 6:4, s. 1-6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The combination of realising buildings with such architectural care that they become high-quality architecture and the momentum of introducing a competitive phase in this creative work may strike most people as odd. However, the phenomenon dates back to the Olympic Games of Ancient Greece, where the harmony between aesthetics and architectural realisation was assessed in a public voting process.
|
|
| 8. |
- Andersson, Jonas E, 1964-, et al.
(författare)
-
Arkitektur för Bo bra på äldre dar : tre tävlingar i Burlöv, Gävle och Linköping
- 2013
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The Swedish governmental two year program “Growing old, Living well” was launched in 2010 with the specific intent to create innovation regarding housing for both able and frail older people. The program has been administered by the Swedish Institute for Assistive Technology (SIAT), which has diffused the allocation of 50 million Swedish crowns into various projects and studies about housing for the ageing generation. Sweden is entering the ageing country in which the group of people aged 65 years and above attains approximately 19 per cent. Apart from regular case studies on different phenomena that occur in relation to older people and housing, the Swedish government designated the architectural competition as an instrument for renewing contemporaneous thinking about ordinary and special housing for older people. National architecture competitions have been used to define space for dependent persons. These competitions have preceded reforms of the social act. In a parallel track, local architecture competitions have resulted in new housing for older people who still able reside within the stock of ordinary housing. According to the SIAT, a total of 18 municipalities requested information about the conditions and possibilities for acquiring finical support for the organization of architecture competitions or studies about housing for senior citizen. Of these, seven applied for funding to organize competitions, but five local organizers were granted funding. Later, two municipalities suspended their competitions due to unforeseen obstacles. The program has resulted in three architectural competitions. The objective for these competitions has been to infuse creative thinking and future-oriented solutions concerning housing for the older people. The present study will shed light on how a municipal actor works with these matters and will supply a time estimate for such a planning process. The study focuses on the three municipal architectural competitions and the two pilot studies that were used as supplementary source of information regarding housing preferences. Supplemented by written documentation, the process of realizing an architecture competition or a pilot study has been reconstructed as to its dynamics. The methodology includes an inventory of competitions, case studies, document review and interviews of key-persons. By use of the competition documentation and the pilot studies, 74 informants were possible to delimit as to their participation in the process. The decisive reason for why the governmental program Growing Older - Living Well didn’t get a better response from the municipalities lies in the timetable for the national initiative. The governmental program was not coordinated with municipal planning processes for housing. Only municipals that already started their planning could consider organizing competitions. The competitions were organized as invited competitions with a prequalification procedure. Prequalification is a selection procedure used early in the competition process to identify suitable candidates for the following design phase. Three to four teams of architects have been invited to develop design proposals. Based on the study, a set comprising of thirty detailed conclusions can be made about the municipal competitions that were arranged with support from the governmental program. However, they all converge into an overarching conclusion that states the direct link between the wording of the competition brief and the participating architects’ inclination to rethink the design task in a fundamental or moderate approach. The study concludes that the better the arranger prepare the competition brief, the more accurately will the participating architects convert this text into future-oriented architecture for older people that is active on a comprehensive level as well as on the detailed level one.
|
|
| 9. |
- Andersson, Jonas E, 1964-, et al.
(författare)
-
Arkitektur för ett åldrande samhälle : tre arkitekttävlingar inom regeringsuppdraget Bo bra på äldre dar
- 2013
-
Ingår i: KRITIK. - Stockholm : Syntes förlag. - 1654-7969. ; :19, s. 38-45
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Under våren 2012 har tre arkitekttävlingen med fokus på olika boendetyper för äldre genomförts. Tävlingarna har varit en del av uppdraget Bo bra på äldre dar, som regeringen i juli 2010 anförtrodde Hjälpmedelsinstitutet, HI, att förvalta.Denna artikel handlar om tävlings- och bedömningsskedet i de tre kommunala arkitekttävlingar, som arrangerades i Burlöv, Gävle och Linköping. Det är tävlingsprogrammets intentioner, deras koppling till regeringsprogrammet och hur tävlande arkitekter har löst tävlingsuppgiften som artikeln lyfter fram. Artikeln utgår från intervjuer med de personer som varit inblandade i tävlingarna från tävlingshandlingarnas framtagande, över inkomna tävlingsförslag till juryns bedömning och korandet av en vinnare.En slutsats från de tre tävlingarna är att bostadsmiljöerna inte bara ska välkomna personer i åldersgruppen 65 år och uppåt. Goda bostäder är inte en åldersfråga och särskilda kategoribostäder för äldre är fel väg att gå för att möta framtidens samhällsutmaningar, enligt jurymedlemmarna. De tre tävlingarna gestaltar ett åldersvänligt boende med kvaliteter som kontakt med omgivningen genom utblickar och dagsljusinfall, en lokalisering till en plats som både erbjuder avskildhet och tillfälle till social gemenskap allt efter den personliga smaken, och inte minst en arkitektonisk utformning och byggd miljö, som skapar förströelse, stöd och upplevelser i vardagen.
|
|
| 10. |
- Andersson, Jonas E, 1964-, et al.
(författare)
-
Editor's comments
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Architectural Competitions. - : Rio Kulturkooperativ.
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
