| 1. |
- Kanakis, George, et al.
(author)
-
Expression of Somatostatin Receptors 1-5 and Dopamine Receptor 2 in Lung Carcinoids : Implications for a Therapeutic Role
- 2015
-
In: Neuroendocrinology. - : S. Karger AG. - 0028-3835 .- 1423-0194. ; 101:3, s. 211-222
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: The expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) and dopamine receptor 2 (DR2) in neuroendocrine tumors is of clinical importance as somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists can be used for their localization and/or treatment. The objective of this study is to examine the expression of the five SSTR subtypes and DR2 in lung carcinoids (LCs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 119 LCs from 106 patients [typical carcinoids (TCs): n = 100, and atypical carcinoids (ACs): n = 19]. The expression of all five SSTR subtypes and DR2 was evaluated immunohistochemically and correlated to clinicopathological data. In a subgroup of cases, receptor expression was further analyzed using semiquantitative RT-PCR. Results: SSTR2A was the SSTR subtype most frequently expressed immunohistochemically (72%), followed by SSTR1 (63%), SSTR5 (40%), and SSTR3 (20%), whereas SSTR4 was negative. DR2 was expressed in 74% and co-expressed with SSTR1 in 56%, with SSTR2A in 59%, with SSTR3 in 19%, and with SSTR5 in 37% of the tumors. Receptor expression was not related to the histological subtype, tumor aggressiveness (disease extent/grading) or functionality; however, DR2 was expressed more frequently in ACs than TCs (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.017). In a subset of patients, RT-PCR findings highly suggested that the expression of SSTR2A, SSTR3, DR2, and to a lesser extent that of SSTR1 and SSTR5 is the outcome of increased gene transcription. Conclusions: The high and variable immunohistochemical expression of the majority of SSTRs along with their co-expression with DR2 in LCs provides a rationale for their possible treatment with agents that target these receptors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kvedaraite, Egle, et al.
(author)
-
Intestinal stroma guides monocyte differentiation to macrophages through GM-CSF
- 2024
-
In: Nature Communications. - : Springer Nature. - 2041-1723. ; 15:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Stromal cells support epithelial cell and immune cell homeostasis and play an important role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis. Here, we quantify the stromal response to inflammation in pediatric IBD and reveal subset-specific inflammatory responses across colon segments and intestinal layers. Using data from a murine dynamic gut injury model and human ex vivo transcriptomic, protein and spatial analyses, we report that PDGFRA+CD142−/low fibroblasts and monocytes/macrophages co-localize in the intestine. In primary human fibroblast-monocyte co-cultures, intestinal PDGFRA+CD142−/low fibroblasts foster monocyte transition to CCR2+CD206+ macrophages through granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Monocyte-derived CCR2+CD206+ cells from co-cultures have a phenotype similar to intestinal CCR2+CD206+ macrophages from newly diagnosed pediatric IBD patients, with high levels of PD-L1 and low levels of GM-CSF receptor. The study describes subset-specific changes in stromal responses to inflammation and suggests that the intestinal stroma guides intestinal macrophage differentiation.
|
|
| 3. |
- Zerdes, Ioannis, et al.
(author)
-
Discordance of PD-L1 Expression at the Protein and RNA Levels in Early Breast Cancer
- 2021
-
In: Cancers. - : MDPI. - 2072-6694. ; 13:18
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Simple Summary Despite the increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors for early and metastatic breast cancer, Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains the only validated albeit imperfect predictive biomarker. Significant discordance in PD-L1 protein expression depending on the antibody used has been demonstrated, while the weak correlation and discordant prognostic information between protein and gene expression underscore its biologic heterogeneity. In this study, we use material from two patient cohorts of early breast cancer and multiple methodologies (immunohistochemistry, RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization, immunofluorescence, bulk gene expression, and multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry) to demonstrate the significant discordance in PD-L1 expression among various methods and between different areas of the same tumor, which hints toward the presence of spatial, intratumoral and biological heterogeneity. We aimed to assess if the discrepant prognostic information between Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein versus mRNA expression in early breast cancer (BC) could be attributed to heterogeneity in its expression. PD-L1 protein and mRNA expression in BC tissue microarrays from two clinical patient cohorts were evaluated (105 patients; cohort 1: untreated; cohort 2: neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with SP142, SP263 was performed. PD-L1 mRNA was evaluated using bulk gene expression and RNA-FISH RNAscope, the latter scored in a semi-quantitative manner and combined with immunofluorescence (IF) staining for the simultaneous detection of PD-L1 protein expression. PD-L1 expression was assessed in cores as a whole and in two regions of interest (ROI) from the same core. The cell origin of PD-L1 expression was evaluated using multiplex fluorescent IHC. IHC PD-L1 expression between SP142 and SP263 was concordant in 86.7% of cores (p < 0.001). PD-L1 IF/IHC was weakly correlated with spatial mRNA expression (concordance 54.6-71.2%). PD-L1 was mostly expressed by lymphocytes intra-tumorally, while its stromal expression was mostly observed in macrophages. Our results demonstrate only moderate concordance between the various methods of assessing PD-L1 expression at the protein and mRNA levels, which may be attributed to both analytical performance and spatial heterogeneity.
|
|
| 4. |
- Zerdes, Ioannis, et al.
(author)
-
PD-1 protein and gene expression in early breast cancer : Prognostic implications
- 2020
-
In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 38:15 Suppl.
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Background: We have previously shown the prognostic value of PD-L1 protein and gene expression in early breast cancer (BC), however, the prognostic role of PD-1 expression remains unclear.Methods: The prognostic value of PD-1 in early BC was investigated using three different approaches: i) evaluation of PD-1 at the protein (IHC, immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays) and mRNA levels in a retrospective patient cohort of 586 patients treated for early BC in Stockholm, Sweden between 1997-2005, ii) systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis of studies published in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection libraries on the prognostic value of PD-1 IHC expression, and iii) pooled analysis of transcriptomic data from 39 publicly available datasets for the prognostic capacity of PD-1 gene expression. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used.Results: In the retrospective study cohort, PD-1 protein was significantly associated with biologically high-risk characteristics. PD-1 protein, but not gene expression, was correlated with improved overall survival (OS) (adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 – 0.96, p = 0.023 and adjusted HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.68 – 1.13, p = 0.307, respectively). In the trial-level meta-analysis, 4736 entries were initially identified and 15 studies, including our original cohort, fulfilled the predefined eligibility criteria. PD-1 IHC expression was not prognostic in unselected patients. However, a significant correlation to improved disease-free survival was seen within the triple-negative subtype (pooled multivariate HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 – 0.90, p = 0.02). In the pooled gene expression analysis, PD-1 gene expression was associated with improved OS in the entire population (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 – 0.99, p = 0.025) and in basal-like (adjusted HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 – 0.95, p = 0.014) tumors.Conclusions: PD-1 expression at the RNA and protein levels represent promising prognostic factors, especially in the triple-negative and basal-like subtypes. Standardization and further validation are needed prior to clinical implementation.
|
|
