| 1. |
- Kanakis, George, et al.
(författare)
-
Expression of Somatostatin Receptors 1-5 and Dopamine Receptor 2 in Lung Carcinoids : Implications for a Therapeutic Role
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Neuroendocrinology. - : S. Karger AG. - 0028-3835 .- 1423-0194. ; 101:3, s. 211-222
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) and dopamine receptor 2 (DR2) in neuroendocrine tumors is of clinical importance as somatostatin analogues and dopamine agonists can be used for their localization and/or treatment. The objective of this study is to examine the expression of the five SSTR subtypes and DR2 in lung carcinoids (LCs). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 119 LCs from 106 patients [typical carcinoids (TCs): n = 100, and atypical carcinoids (ACs): n = 19]. The expression of all five SSTR subtypes and DR2 was evaluated immunohistochemically and correlated to clinicopathological data. In a subgroup of cases, receptor expression was further analyzed using semiquantitative RT-PCR. Results: SSTR2A was the SSTR subtype most frequently expressed immunohistochemically (72%), followed by SSTR1 (63%), SSTR5 (40%), and SSTR3 (20%), whereas SSTR4 was negative. DR2 was expressed in 74% and co-expressed with SSTR1 in 56%, with SSTR2A in 59%, with SSTR3 in 19%, and with SSTR5 in 37% of the tumors. Receptor expression was not related to the histological subtype, tumor aggressiveness (disease extent/grading) or functionality; however, DR2 was expressed more frequently in ACs than TCs (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.017). In a subset of patients, RT-PCR findings highly suggested that the expression of SSTR2A, SSTR3, DR2, and to a lesser extent that of SSTR1 and SSTR5 is the outcome of increased gene transcription. Conclusions: The high and variable immunohistochemical expression of the majority of SSTRs along with their co-expression with DR2 in LCs provides a rationale for their possible treatment with agents that target these receptors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Zerdes, Ioannis, et al.
(författare)
-
PD-1 protein and gene expression in early breast cancer : Prognostic implications
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 38:15 Suppl.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: We have previously shown the prognostic value of PD-L1 protein and gene expression in early breast cancer (BC), however, the prognostic role of PD-1 expression remains unclear.Methods: The prognostic value of PD-1 in early BC was investigated using three different approaches: i) evaluation of PD-1 at the protein (IHC, immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays) and mRNA levels in a retrospective patient cohort of 586 patients treated for early BC in Stockholm, Sweden between 1997-2005, ii) systematic review and trial-level meta-analysis of studies published in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection libraries on the prognostic value of PD-1 IHC expression, and iii) pooled analysis of transcriptomic data from 39 publicly available datasets for the prognostic capacity of PD-1 gene expression. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used.Results: In the retrospective study cohort, PD-1 protein was significantly associated with biologically high-risk characteristics. PD-1 protein, but not gene expression, was correlated with improved overall survival (OS) (adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 – 0.96, p = 0.023 and adjusted HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.68 – 1.13, p = 0.307, respectively). In the trial-level meta-analysis, 4736 entries were initially identified and 15 studies, including our original cohort, fulfilled the predefined eligibility criteria. PD-1 IHC expression was not prognostic in unselected patients. However, a significant correlation to improved disease-free survival was seen within the triple-negative subtype (pooled multivariate HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 – 0.90, p = 0.02). In the pooled gene expression analysis, PD-1 gene expression was associated with improved OS in the entire population (adjusted HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 – 0.99, p = 0.025) and in basal-like (adjusted HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.63 – 0.95, p = 0.014) tumors.Conclusions: PD-1 expression at the RNA and protein levels represent promising prognostic factors, especially in the triple-negative and basal-like subtypes. Standardization and further validation are needed prior to clinical implementation.
|
|
