SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Rauschmayer Felix) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Rauschmayer Felix)

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Kunsch, Pierre, et al. (författare)
  • Modelling complex ethical decision problems with operations research
  • 2009
  • Ingår i: Omega. - : Elsevier BV. - 0305-0483 .- 1873-5274. ; 37:6, s. 1100-1108
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • This paper discusses the practical contribution of operations research (OR) techniques to modelling decision-making problems with ethical dimensions. Such problems are frequent in the global world: they frequently appear today in sustainability issues, e.g., in conflicts in the triangle of society, economy and environment. We show that the prerequisites for ethical problem-modelling are: the definition of moral principles, the evaluation of the decision context, the participation of stakeholders, the multidisciplinary collection of data, and the understanding of systemic interconnections. Classical OR instruments, mainly used in logistics and optimisation problems, are not entirely satisfactory for coping with the new ethical dimensions of sustainability. It is recommended to use and to develop more advanced, or combined instruments from the multi-criteria/multi-stakeholder and systemic streams of OR. It is argued that an important added value of using OR techniques for modelling today ethical issues lies at least as much in the discovery of open questions as in finding closed-form solutions.
  •  
2.
  • Luederitz, Christopher, et al. (författare)
  • Learning through Evaluation: A Tentative Evaluative Scheme for Sustainability Transition Experiments
  • 2017
  • Ingår i: Journal of Cleaner Production. - 0959-6526. ; 169, s. 61-76
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Transitions towards sustainability are urgently needed to address the interconnected challenges of economic development, ecological integrity, and social justice, from local to global scales. Around the world, collaborative science-society initiatives are forming to conduct experiments in support of sustainability transitions. Such experiments, if carefully designed, provide significant learning opportunities for making progress on transition efforts. Yet, there is no broadly applicable evaluative scheme available to capture this critical information across a large number of cases, and to guide the design of transition experiments. To address this gap, the article develops such a scheme, in a tentative form, drawing on evaluative research and sustainability transitions scholarship, alongside insights from empirical cases. We critically discuss the scheme's key features of being generic, comprehensive, operational, and formative. Furthermore, we invite scholars and practitioners to apply, reflect and further develop the proposed tentative scheme – making evaluation and experiments objects of learning.
  •  
3.
  • Rauschmayer, Felix, et al. (författare)
  • Why good practice of OR is not enough : Ethical challenges for the OR practitioner
  • 2009
  • Ingår i: Omega. - : Elsevier BV. - 0305-0483 .- 1873-5274. ; 37:6, s. 1089-1099
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • This paper develops the idea that following rules of good OR practice is necessary, but not sufficient for ethical OR. Several challenges of introducing ethical aspects into OR are discussed, evidencing difficulties and ambiguities in the relationship to be established between the OR practitioner and his/her clients, decision-makers or stakeholders. It shows that neither analysis nor modelling work nor the choice of analytical tools is entirely ethically neutral; incomparability, incommensurability and incertitude must be dealt with. Thepurpose of this article is to detail several difficulties or dilemmas an OR practitioner may be confronted with in the course of his or her assignment. In such situations, following rules of good practice may not be sufficient to indicate how to act in a morally good way. This paper aims at stimulating reflection by structuring the debate; it may leave the reader unsettled—unsettlement being a result and even aim of many discussions in moralphilosophy.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy