| 1. |
- Månsson, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Understanding and overcoming obstacles in adaptive management
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. - : Elsevier Ltd.. - 0169-5347 .- 1872-8383. ; 38:1, s. 55-71
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Adaptive management (AM) is widely promoted to improve management of natural resources, yet its implementation is challenging. We show that obstacles to the implementation of AM are related not only to the AM process per se but also to external factors such as ecosystem properties and governance systems. To overcome obstacles, there is a need to build capacities within the AM process by ensuring adequate resources, management tools, collaboration, and learning. Additionally, building capacities in the legal and institutional frames can enable the necessary flexibility in the governance system. Furthermore, in systems experiencing profound changes in wildlife populations, building such capacities may be even more critical as more flexibility will be needed to cope with increased uncertainty and changed environmental conditions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Reed, Mark S., et al.
(författare)
-
The future of the uplands
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Land use policy. - : Elsevier Limited. - 0264-8377 .- 1873-5754. ; 26:Supplement 1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Upland areas provide UK society with many important functions, goods and services, but have experienced a number of disturbing trends and face an uncertain future. This paper outlines historic, current and future drivers of environmental, economic, socio-cultural and policy change in UK uplands, and assesses how these have affected or are likely to affect ways in which land is used and the provision of ecosystem services. Information is synthesised into scenarios summarising a range of possible futures anticipated for UK uplands to 2060 and beyond. Finally, innovations in science, technology, governance and policy are evaluated that could enable uplands to continue providing key ecosystem services under a range of scenarios. The paper concludes that many upland areas will need to be prepared for significant reductions in grazing and prescribed burning. Conversely, other areas could experience agricultural intensification, for example significant increases in grazing or an expansion of arable or bioenergy crops into upland valleys, due to anticipated increases in global demand for food and energy. These scenarios will take place in the context of climate change. Many may take place together and may interact with each other, with complex and unpredictable implications for the upland environment, economy and society. In this context, a number of advances are needed in science, technology and policy to maintain viable uplandcommunities and the future provision of ecosystem services. These may include funding for ecological and hydrological restoration via carbon offsetting or other means. It may also involve advances in ecosystem service modelling, mapping and valuation, which through stakeholder participation could facilitate more integrated rural planning. New forms of environmental governance need to be explored that can empower those interested in developing upland economies to maintain thriving upland communities, while managing the ecosystem services they provide as efficiently as possible.
|
|
| 3. |
- Redpath, Steve M., et al.
(författare)
-
Don't forget to look down – collaborative approaches to predator conservation
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Biological Reviews. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1464-7931 .- 1469-185X. ; 92:4, s. 2157-2163
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Finding effective ways of conserving large carnivores is widely recognised as a priority in conservation. However, there is disagreement about the most effective way to do this, with some favouring top-down ‘command and control’ approaches and others favouring collaboration. Arguments for coercive top-down approaches have been presented elsewhere; here we present arguments for collaboration. In many parts of the developed world, flexibility of approach is built into the legislation, so that conservation objectives are balanced with other legitimate goals. In the developing world, limited resources, poverty and weak governance mean that collaborative approaches are likely to play a particularly important part in carnivore conservation. In general, coercive policies may lead to the deterioration of political legitimacy and potentially to non-compliance issues such as illegal killing, whereas collaborative approaches may lead to psychological ownership, enhanced trust, learning, and better social outcomes. Sustainable hunting/trapping plays a crucial part in the conservation and management of many large carnivores. There are many different models for how to conserve carnivores effectively across the world, research is now required to reduce uncertainty and examine the effectiveness of these approaches in different contexts.
|
|
| 4. |
- Eriksson, Louise, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Individuals and Multilevel Management : A Study of the Perceived Adaptive Capacity of the Goose Management System among Farmers in Sweden
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Society and Natural Resources. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0894-1920 .- 1521-0723. ; 35:1, s. 1-19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Agricultural damage by geese is a growing problem in Europe and farmers play a key role in the emerging multilevel adaptive management system. This study explored how characteristics associated with the farmer and the farm, along with experience of damage, cognitive appraisals, emotions, and management beliefs were associated with the perceived adaptive capacity of the goose management system among farmers in the south of Sweden (n = 1,067). Survey results revealed that owning a larger farm, a farm closer to water or formally protected areas, along with cultivating cereal and root crops, were associated with geese evoking stronger negative emotions. Further, more previous experience of damage was related to stronger negative emotions and lower levels of perceived adaptive capacity. However, even more important determinants of perceived adaptive capacity were cognitive appraisals, emotions, and management beliefs. Bridging the ties between individual farmers and the system is important for improved multilevel management.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Strong, Emily A., et al.
(författare)
-
Seeking greener pastures : crop selection by Greylag Geese (Anser anser) during the moulting season
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Ornis Fennica. - : University of Helsinki. - 0030-5685. ; 98:1, s. 16-32
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Under de senaste 50 åren har åtskilliga gåspopulationer återhämtat sig från historiskt låga nivåer till att nu vara större än någonsin. Samtidigt har gäss i stor utsträckning övergivit sina ursprungliga födosöksmiljöer för att numer finna nästan all sin föda på jordbruksmark, något som ibland leder till konflikt på grund av betesskador. Vi studerade grödoval hos gragäss (Anser anser) i ett jordbruksdominerat landskap kring en viktig häcknings- och ruggningssjö i södra Sverige. Från 2012 till 2016 skedde inventeringar från vägar i studieområdet varje vecka under maj, juni och juli. Vi noterade antalet gäss, grödoslag och grödohöjd på alla fält med gragäss. Statistiska analyser (compositional analysis) visade att grägässen starkt föredrog fält med vall eller betesmark framför andra grödor (preferensordning: vall/betesmark > havre > korn > vete > övriga grödor). Preferensmönstret var det samma oberoende av år och period under sommaren (före resp. efter ruggning). Alla andra grödoslag än vall och betesmark var icke föredragna, eftersom de utnyttjades mindre än deras andel av studieområdet. Den starka preferensen för vall och betesmark kan vara en följd av en högre näringsmässig kvalitet hos gräs som ännu inte blivit högvuxet. Detta antyder i sin tur att fält med kort gräs är mer utsatta för gåsbete än andra grödor under sommarmånaderna. Denna studie ger ny kunskap om grágässens uppträdande på jordbruksmark under senvår och sommar, vilken kan ge förbättrade förvaltningsstrategier för att minska betesskador och reducera konflikten med jordbruksintressen.
|
|
