| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersson, Torbjörn, et al.
(författare)
-
Juridikens termer
- 2015. - 10
-
Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Juridikens termer är ett klassikt uppslagsverk som kortfattat förklarar centrala juridiska termer. Boken är sedan många år ett värdefullt hjälpmedel för verksamma jurister och studerande samt för alla andra som kommer i kontakt med frågor av juridisk natur.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bessani, A., et al.
(författare)
-
BiobankCloud : A platform for the secure storage, sharing, and processing of large biomedical data sets
- 2016
-
Ingår i: 1st International Workshop on Data Management and Analytics for Medicine and Healthcare, DMAH 2015 and Workshop on Big-Graphs Online Querying, Big-O(Q) 2015 held in conjunction with 41st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB 2015. - Cham : Springer. - 9783319415758 - 9783319415765 ; , s. 89-105
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Biobanks store and catalog human biological material that is increasingly being digitized using next-generation sequencing (NGS). There is, however, a computational bottleneck, as existing software systems are not scalable and secure enough to store and process the incoming wave of genomic data from NGS machines. In the BiobankCloud project, we are building a Hadoop-based platform for the secure storage, sharing, and parallel processing of genomic data. We extended Hadoop to include support for multi-tenant studies, reduced storage requirements with erasure coding, and added support for extensible and consistent metadata. On top of Hadoop, we built a scalable scientific workflow engine featuring a proper workflow definition language focusing on simple integration and chaining of existing tools, adaptive scheduling on Apache Yarn, and support for iterative dataflows. Our platform also supports the secure sharing of data across different, distributed Hadoop clusters. The software is easily installed and comes with a user-friendly web interface for running, managing, and accessing data sets behind a secure 2-factor authentication. Initial tests have shown that the engine scales well to dozens of nodes. The entire system is open-source and includes pre-defined workflows for popular tasks in biomedical data analysis, such as variant identification, differential transcriptome analysis using RNA-Seq, and analysis of miRNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq data.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, 1989-
(författare)
-
Integritet och skadestånd : Om skyddet för personuppgifter och privatliv i svensk rätt
- 2020
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- How can tort law help protect privacy in the digital age? This central issue is examined from different perspectives throughout the thesis, with an emphasis on personal information (also called informational privacy). Privacy has long been a debated topic in the Swedish legal system, for several reasons. One is the confusion surrounding the concept. Because of the difficulties both scholars and legislators have encountered regarding the definition of privacy, it is often seen as an interest too vague to regulate. Further, freedom of expression, freedom of the press and access to public documents – three rights that are often presented as opposites to privacy – have traditionally been prioritised in the legislative process.Apart from the binding ECHR and EU regulations, there are still no general clauses to protect privacy in Swedish law. Instead, this value has been approached in a cautious and even reluctant way, by establishing sanctions for certain privacy invasions. Consequently, the existing privacy protection is spread out over many different legal areas. In order to reconcile national principles with our European obligations, the author argues that it is necessary both to understand our “negative” Swedish approach and the “positive” ECHR and EU rights set out in Article 8 ECHR, Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter and the GDPR.After examining these legal traditions – with some comparative glances at US developments regarding the right to privacy – the thesis explores an alternative approach using a theoretical model referred to as contextual integrity. This framework is adapted for privacy protection in the digital age and focuses more on appropriate information flows than definitions of privacy. The model is used for a reading of Swedish tort law cases on privacy invasions, specifically in order to relate the tort law principles to existing or evolving social norms in the situations in which damage claims originate. It is suggested that, by developing an understanding for the relationship between the legal and the social in this dynamic area, we can make the most of tort law as a tool for privacy protection in the future.
|
|
| 6. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, 1989-, et al.
(författare)
-
Public Registries as Tools for Realising the Swedish Welfare State – Can the State still Be Trusted?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review. - Budapest : Ludovika University Press. - 2498-6275 .- 2786-0736. ; 6:2, s. 35-52
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Sweden has a long tradition of transparency and keeping public archives and registries for the benefit of the society at large. Access to comprehensive public information, including registries containing individualised data, has been an integral part in the building of the Swedish welfare state. An important explanatory factor for its acceptance is the high level of social trust in the Swedish society, in that citizens to a large extent trust each other, the government and the public authorities and other institutions in the society. Over the last few decades, changes have taken place connected to digitalisation of the society and an increased awareness of the possible privacy intrusion that may follow. A number of Swedish “register scandals” have been unearthed in media, involving both private and public entities. In order to protect the Swedish cultural heritage of accessible archives and public information and retain social trust, the Swedish legislator should carefully balance the interest in transparency against the right to privacy and data protection following the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and EU law
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, 1989-, et al.
(författare)
-
Supervision of Artificial Intelligence in the EU and the Protection of Privacy
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Florida International University Law Review. - Getzville, New York. - 2643-7767 .- 2643-7759. ; 17:2, s. 267-285
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In this paper, the supervisory regime in the proposed EU General Regulation on AI will be analyzed, with the aim to critically assess the role of supervisory authorities with regards to AI systems in safeguarding both the development of AI systems and protecting democratic and individual rights. As with other supervisory structures in EU law, such as data protection and financial market law, the proposed network is to consist of an agency at the EU level, the new European Artificial Intelligence Board (EAIB), as well as supervisory authorities located at the national level. These regulatory and supervisory administrative structures can be identified as a part of the success story described as the Brussels effect, where EU regulatory regimes on data protection have had a global impact. However effective, can a network of independent supervisory authorities be trusted to effectively monitor the use of developing AI systems and at the same time balance the benefits and risk of the new technologies with the fundamental rights of privacy, data protection, freedom of information, and non-discrimination? Considering the largely unknown, dynamic character of AI, the central democratic function of freedom of information, and the individual right to privacy and data protection, the question must be asked if there is a limit to how much power it is reasonable to bestow on these networks of supervisory authorities.
|
|
| 9. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, et al.
(författare)
-
Supervision of Artificial Intelligence in the EU and the Protection of Privacy
- 2023
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- After decades of technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) is now causing a flurry of movement in the legal domain. Lately, strong caveats from developers in the AI industry seem to have been accompanied by increasing societal concern about the potential negative effects on humans of unregulated AI. As part of its European Digital Strategy, the EU has put forward a number of initiatives addressing AI. The most important of these is the regulation referred to as the Artificial Intelligence Act (“the AI Act”), proposed by the Commission in April 2021 and currently still under negotiation. If passed, this will be the first comprehensive legal instrument regarding AI at a global level. Following the regulatory success of the GDPR, the EU could once again take the lead in developing regulatory regimes creating both fair competition and foreseeability for market actors and protection of the rights and interests of individuals, guaranteed by effective cross-border enforcement machinery. Will the AI Act become the next example of the Brussels effect, as Anu Bradford has labeled it, and would this be a good idea?
|
|
| 10. |
- Chamberlain, Johanna, et al.
(författare)
-
The Relationship Between Damages and Administrative Fines in the EU General Data Protection Regulation
- 2019
-
Ingår i: SSRN Electronic Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 1556-5068.
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Two purposes of the GDPR are to provide effective remedies for ensuring extensive personal data rights and to change practices and policies of controllers and processors so that they become more aware of privacy protection. Article 58 GDPR lays down the investigative and corrective powers of the national supervisory authorities, such as issuing warnings or imposing new administrative fines. Article 79 GDPR states that every data subject whose rights according to the regulation have been infringed shall have access to an effective remedy. The two measures in focus here are those with the largest economic impact: Article 82 on damages and Article 83 on administrative fines. These articles target different areas and subjects – while the first has a compensatory purpose and is designed for use by individuals, the second has a preventive character and is implemented by Data Protection Authorities vis-á-vis controllers and processors. Considering these two profiles, an interesting question arises: Why are the provisions of Article 83 for imposing fines on companies and organisations so detailed, while the wording of Article 82 and hence the liability for controllers and processors is open to interpretation? What does this difference lead to in the application of the regulation, and more precisely, is it likely that the development in regards to administrative fines could spill over to the application of rules on damages?
|
|
