| 1. |
- Bachmaier, Hans, et al.
(författare)
-
Bereal - method for pellet stoves : Field test and round robin
- 2017
-
Ingår i: European Biomass Conf. Exhib. Proc.. - : ETA-Florence Renewable Energies. ; , s. 642-647
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recent pellet stoves perform excellently under type test conditions. In contrast, typical real life emissions show significantly higher values under usual operational conditions. Consequently, type testing procedures may not account for real life stove operation and, thus, do not allow to distinguish between low- and high-tech appliances. The EU-project beReal aimed at the development of a testing method for pellet stoves that reflects real life operations better and to support innovative pellet stoves that perform well under typical operational conditions. Based on an online survey and field observations, an advanced real life testing procedure for pellet stoves was established reflecting real life user behavior, e.g. regarding different load levels and the ignition phase. A field test was designed at the end of the project to demonstrate the applicability and practical relevance. The field test proved that emission values for beReal at the test stand and in the field stay within the same range. A Round Robin test proved the repeatability and reproducibility of the beReal testing procedure. The beReal method can be reproduced with the same statistical variability or performed even better than the type testing method with exception of PM between different laboratories. © 2017, ETA-Florence Renewable Energies. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Karmouch, Ahmed, et al.
(författare)
-
Contextware Research Challenges in Ambient Networks
- 2004
-
Ingår i: IEEE MATA 2004 1st International Workshop on Mobility Aware Technologies and Applications 20-22 October 2004, Florianopolis, Brazil - www.ic.unicamp.br/mata04. - : Springer. - 3540234233
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 4. |
- Klauser, Franziska, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of Oxidizing Honeycomb Catalysts Integrated in a Firewood Room Heater on Gaseous and Particulate Emissions, Including Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Energy & Fuels. - : American Chemical Society (ACS). - 0887-0624 .- 1520-5029. ; 32:11, s. 11876-11886
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Residential wood combustion is linked to a significant extent of emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which represent highly toxic, semivolatile pollutants. The use of catalysts reveals an effective measure to reduce emissions, especially gaseous flue gas compounds (carbon monoxide (CO) and organic gaseous compounds (OGC)). Their effect on toxicologically relevant PAHs is not clarified yet. In this work, the impact of two commercially available oxidizing platinum/palladium catalysts with either metallic or ceramic honeycomb carriers was examined under real-life operating conditions of a firewood room heater. The catalytic effect on CO and OGC, total suspended particles (TSP), total carbon (TC), elemental carbon (EC), organic carbon (OC), and 19 different PAHs, including 16 EPA PAHs (PAHs defined by the Environmental Protection Agency as priority pollutants) was evaluated by parallel measurements of catalytically treated and untreated flue gas from firewood combustion. The metallic catalyst, having a reaction surface that is 3.5 times greater than the ceramic catalyst, leads to a more-pronounced impact. Both types, the ceramic and the metallic catalyst, led to distinct reductions of CO (-69%, -88%) and OGC (-27%, -39%). In the test with the metallic catalyst, TSP increased (+17%) and PAHs were clearly reduced (-63%). This reduction was exclusively related to the higher-molecular-weight PAHs, such as the particularly toxic benzo(a)pyrene. Carbonaceous fractions (TC, EC, and OC) were not affected significantly. The toxicity of emissions arising from EPA PAHs can be clearly reduced by catalytic treatment. Moreover, the increase of TSP opens new questions, which must be clarified before the investigated catalysts are recommended as suitable secondary measure for emission abatement.
|
|
| 5. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
