| 1. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 2. |
- Schlumberger, Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
Follow-up of low-risk patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: a European perspective.
- 2004
-
Ingår i: European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. - 0804-4643. ; 150:2, s. 105-12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Because differentiated (follicular and papillary) thyroid cancer (DTC) may recur years after initial treatment, the follow-up of patients with DTC is long term. However, this population has changed, with more individuals being discovered at an earlier stage of the disease, so that previous follow-up protocols based mostly on data from high-risk patients no longer apply. We sought to develop an improved protocol for the follow-up of low-risk patients with DTC based on the findings of recent studies. METHODS: We analysed recent literature on the follow-up of DTC. RESULTS: Recent large studies have produced three important findings: (i) in patients with low-risk DTC with no evidence of disease up to the 6- to 12-month follow-up, diagnostic whole-body scan adds no information when serum thyroglobulin (Tg) is undetectable and interference from anti-Tg antibodies is absent; (ii) use of recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to aid Tg measurement is effective and provides greater safety, quality-of-life and work productivity than does levothyroxine withdrawal with its attendant hypothyroidism; and (iii) ultrasonography performed by an experienced operator is the most sensitive means of detecting neck recurrences of DTC. CONCLUSIONS: We present a revised follow-up protocol for low-risk patients taking into account the above findings. This protocol should help clinicians enter a new era of monitoring characterized by greater safety, simplicity, convenience and cost savings.
|
|
