| 1. |
- Buiting, Hilde M., et al.
(författare)
-
Forgoing artificial nutrition or hydration in patients nearing death in six European countries
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. - : Elsevier BV. - 0885-3924 .- 1873-6513. ; 34:3, s. 305-314
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Whether or not artificial nutrition or hydration (ANH) may be forgone in terminally ill patients has been the subject of medical and ethical discussions. Information about the frequency and background characteristics of making decisions to forgo ANH is generally limited to specific clinical settings. The aim of this study was to compare the Practice of forgoing ANH in six European countries: Belgium, Denmark, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. In each country, random samples were drawn from death registries. Subsequently, the reporting physician received a questionnaire about the medical decisions that preceded the patient's death. The total number of deaths studied was 20,480. The percentage of all deaths that were preceded by a decision to forgo ANH varied from 2.6% in Italy to 10.9% in The Netherlands. In most countries, decisions to forgo ANH were more frequently made for female patients, patients aged 80 years or older, and for patients who died of a malignancy or disease of the nervous system (including dementia). Of patients in whom ANH was forgone, 67%-93% were incompetent. Patients in whom ANH was forgone did not receive more potentially life-shorlening drugs to relieve symptoms than other Patients for whom other end-of-life decisions had been made. Decisions to forgo ANH are made in a substantial percentage of terminally ill patients. Providing all patients who are in the terminal stage of a lethal disease with ANH does not seem to be a widely accepted standard among physicians in Western Europe.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- van der Smissen, Doris, et al.
(författare)
-
The Web-Based Advance Care Planning Program "Explore Your Preferences for Treatment and Care" : Development, Pilot Study, and Before-and-After Evaluation
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Medical Internet Research. - : JMIR Publications Inc.. - 1438-8871. ; 24:12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Web-based advance care planning (ACP) programs may support patients in thinking about and discussing their preferences for future treatment and care. However, they are not widely available, and only a limited number of programs are evidence based.Objective:We aimed to develop and evaluate an evidence-based, interactive web-based ACP program that guides users through the process of thinking about, discussing, and recording of preferences for treatment and care.Methods:The program “Explore your preferences for treatment and care” was developed, pilot-tested on feasibility, and subsequently evaluated; engagement in ACP was assessed before program completion and 2 months after program completion using the ACP Engagement Survey (score 1-5) among 147 persons with chronic disease. Usability (score 0-100) and user satisfaction (score 1-5) were also assessed.Results:ACP engagement increased from 2.8 before program completion to 3.0 two months after program completion (P<.001); contemplation about ACP increased from 2.6 to 2.8 (P=.003), and readiness for ACP increased from 2.2 to 2.5 (P<.001). No changes were found for knowledge about ACP (3.0-3.2; P=.07) and self-efficacy for ACP (3.8-3.8; P=.25). The program was perceived as usable (mean 70, SD 13), attractive (mean 3.8, SD 0.7), and comprehensible (mean 4.2, SD 0.6).Conclusions:We developed an evidence-based, interactive web-based ACP program in cocreation with patients, relatives, and health care professionals. Before-and-after evaluation showed that the program can support people in taking first steps in ACP and in reflecting on preferences for treatment and care, by guiding them through the process of ACP using a stepwise approach. Participants perceived the program as usable and understandable, and they were satisfied with the program and with the amount of information. Health care professionals may use the program as a tool to start ACP discussions with their patients. The program may increase awareness of ACP.
|
|
