| 1. |
- Almstrand, Ann-Charlotte, et al.
(författare)
-
An explorative study on respiratory health among operators working in polymer additive manufacturing
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Public Health. - : Frontiers Media S.A.. - 2296-2565. ; 11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Additive manufacturing (AM), or 3D printing, is a growing industry involving a wide range of different techniques and materials. The potential toxicological effects of emissions produced in the process, involving both ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), are unclear, and there are concerns regarding possible health implications among AM operators.The objective of this study was to screen the presence of respiratory health effects among people working with liquid, powdered, or filament plastic materials in AM. MethodsIn total, 18 subjects working with different additive manufacturing techniques and production of filament with polymer feedstock and 20 controls participated in the study. Study subjects filled out a questionnaire and underwent blood and urine sampling, spirometry, impulse oscillometry (IOS), exhaled NO test (FeNO), and collection of particles in exhaled air (PEx), and the exposure was assessed. Analysis of exhaled particles included lung surfactant components such as surfactant protein A (SP-A) and phosphatidylcholines. SP-A and albumin were determined using ELISA. Using reversed-phase liquid chromatography and targeted mass spectrometry, the relative abundance of 15 species of phosphatidylcholine (PC) was determined in exhaled particles. The results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses (principal component analysis). ResultsExposure and emission measurements in AM settings revealed a large variation in particle and VOC concentrations as well as the composition of VOCs, depending on the AM technique and feedstock. Levels of FeNO, IOS, and spirometry parameters were within clinical reference values for all AM operators. There was a difference in the relative abundance of saturated, notably dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (PC16:0_16:0), and unsaturated lung surfactant lipids in exhaled particles between controls and AM operators. ConclusionThere were no statistically significant differences between AM operators and controls for the different health examinations, which may be due to the low number of participants. However, the observed difference in the PC lipid profile in exhaled particles indicates a possible impact of the exposure and could be used as possible early biomarkers of adverse effects in the airways.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kokelj, Spela, 1992, et al.
(författare)
-
Intra-individual variation of particles in exhaled air and of the contents of Surfactant protein A and albumin
- 2020
-
Ingår i: PLoS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 15:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2020 Kokelj et al. Introduction Particles in exhaled air (PEx) provide samples of respiratory tract lining fluid from small airways containing, for example, Surfactant protein A (SP-A) and albumin, potential biomarkers of small airway disease. We hypothesized that there are differences between morning, noon, and afternoon measurements and that the variability of repeated measurements is larger between days than within days. Methods PEx was obtained in sixteen healthy non-smoking adults on 11 occasions, within one day and between days. SP-A and albumin were quantified by ELISA. The coefficient of repeatability (CR), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to assess the variation of repeated measurements. Results SP-A and albumin increased significantly from morning towards the noon and afternoon by 13% and 25% on average, respectively, whereas PEx number concentration and particle mean mass did not differ significantly between the morning, noon and afternoon. Betweenday CRs were not larger than within-day CRs. Conclusions Time of the day influences the contents of SP-A and albumin in exhaled particles. The variation of repeated measurements was rather high but was not influenced by the time intervals between measurements.
|
|
| 3. |
- Runström Eden, Gunilla, et al.
(författare)
-
Exploring Methods for Surveillance of Occupational Exposure from Additive Manufacturing in Four Different Industrial Facilities
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Work Exposures and Health. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2398-7308 .- 2398-7316. ; 66:2, s. 163-177
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- 3D printing, a type of additive manufacturing (AM), is a rapidly expanding field. Some adverse health effects have been associated with exposure to printing emissions, which makes occupational exposure studies important. There is a lack of exposure studies, particularly from printing methods other than material extrusion (ME). The presented study aimed to evaluate measurement methods for exposure assessment in AM environments and to measure exposure and emissions from four different printing methods [powder bed fusion (PBF), material extrusion (ME), material jetting (MJ), and vat photopolymerization] in industry. Structured exposure diaries and volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors were used over a 5-day working week. Personal and stationary VOC samples and real-time particle measurements were taken for 1 day per facility. Personal inhalable and respirable dust samples were taken during PBF and MJ AM. The use of structured exposure diaries in combination with measurement data revealed that comparatively little time is spent on actual printing and the main exposure comes from post-processing tasks. VOC and particle instruments that log for a longer period are a useful tool as they facilitate the identification of work tasks with high emissions, highlight the importance of ventilation and give a more gathered view of variations in exposure. No alarming levels of VOCs or dust were detected during print nor post-processing in these facilities as adequate preventive measures were installed. As there are a few studies reporting negative health effects, it is still important to keep the exposure as low as reasonable.
|
|
| 4. |
- Runström Eden, Gunilla, et al.
(författare)
-
Particle and VOC Emissions During the Thermal Processing of Plastics to make Filaments for 3D-Printing
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of Work Exposures and Health. - : Oxford University Press. - 2398-7308 .- 2398-7316. ; 67:Supplement_1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction 3D-printing is continuing to grow as an industry, which creates a demand for printing material. Studies on 3D-printing have shown that printers emit nanoparticles and VOC, depending on printing method, and some adverse health effects have been reported. Emissions during production of 3D-printer filament is less studied, and interesting as it can be likened to a larger material extrusion printer. Materials and methods Measurements were made at a factory producing 3D-printer filaments, using an array of instruments to characterise the emissions and exposure for the staff. Particle emissions were assessed using condensation particle counters (20nm-1um), DataRAM (0.1-10 um) and a particle sensor (0.35-40 um). VOC emissions and exposure were assessed using Tenax tubes and VOC sensors. Measurements were performed for 1-2 days, apart from sensors, which were placed at the facility for a full working week, including after a longer break . Results High concentrations of nanoparticles were found in the production rooms (25 000-100 000 pt/ml) and close to the extruder nozzle (100 000-500 000 pt/ml). Levels of nanoparticles were also high in office rooms near production(25 000-50 000 pt/ml). VOC sensors showed the same trend in all rooms, including offices and staff kitchen, indicating spread of emissions from the source and inadequate ventilation. The particle sensor also showed variation over the week in correlation with work performed. Conclusion Production of 3D-printer filaments emit nanoparticles and VOC. Inadequate ventilation can lead to high concentrations of nanoparticles. Sensors were a useful tool to show emission trends.
|
|
