| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Khoshnood, Behzad, 1986-
(författare)
-
Function and targets of the Urm1/Uba4 conjugation machinery in Drosophila melanogaster
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Posttranslational modification (PTM) of proteins is essential to maintain homeostasis and viability in all eukaryotic cells. Hence, besides the sequence and 3D folding of a polypeptide, modification by multiple types of PTMs, ranging from small molecular groups to entire protein modules, adds another layer of complexity to protein function and regulation. The ubiquitin-like modifiers (UBLs) are such a group of evolutionary conserved protein modifiers, which by covalently conjugating to target proteins can modulate the subcellular localization and activity of their targets. One example of such a UBL, is the Ubiquitin related modifier 1 (Urm1). Since its discovery in 2000, Urm1 has been depicted as a dual function protein, which besides acting as a PTM, in addition functions as a sulfur carrier during the thio-modification of a specific group of tRNAs. Due to this dual capacity, Urm1 is considered as the evolutionary ancestor of the entire UBL family. At present, it is well established that Urm1, with help of its dedicated E1 enzyme Uba4/MOCS3, conjugates to multiple target proteins (urmylation) and that Urm1 thus plays important roles in viability and the response against oxidative stress.The aim of this thesis has been to, for the first time, investigate the role of Urm1 and Uba4 in a multicellular organism, utilising a multidisciplinary approach that integrates Drosophila genetics with classical biochemical assays and proteomics. In Paper I, we first characterized the Drosophila orthologues of Urm1 (CG33276) and Uba4 (CG13090), verified that they interact physically as well as genetically, and that they together can induce urmylation in the fly. By subsequently generating an Urm1 null Drosophila mutant (Urm1n123), we established that Urm1 is essential for viability and that flies lacking Urm1 are resistant to oxidative stress. Providing a molecular explanation for this phenotype, we demonstrated an involvement of Urm1 in the regulation of JNK signaling, including the transcription of the cytoprotective genes Jafrac1 and gstD1. Besides the resistance to oxidative stress, we have moreover (Manuscript IV) made an in-depth investigation of another phenotype displayed by Urm1n123 mutants, an overgrowth of third instar larval neuromuscular junctions (NMJs), a phenotype which is shared also with mutants lacking Uba4 (Uba4n29).To increase the understanding of Urm1 in the fly, we next employed a proteomics-based approach to identify candidate Urm1 target proteins (Paper II). Using this strategy, we identified 79 Urm1-interacting proteins during three different stages of fly development. Of these, six was biochemically confirmed to interact covalently with Urm1, whereas one was found to be associated with Urm1 by non-covalent means. In Manuscript III, we additionally identified the virally encoded oncogene Tax as a target of Urm1, both in Drosophila tissues and mammalian cell lines. In this study, we established a strong correlation between Tax urmylation and subcellular localization, and that Urm1 promoted a cytoplasmic accumulation and enhanced signalling activity of Tax, with implications for a potential role of Urm1 in Tax-induced oncogenesis.Taken together, this thesis provides a basic understanding of the potential roles and targets of Urm1 in a multicellular organism. The four studies included cover different aspects of Urm1 function and clearly points towards a highly dynamic role of protein urmylation in fly development, as well as in adult life.
|
|
| 3. |
- Klionsky, Daniel J., et al.
(författare)
-
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Autophagy. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1554-8635 .- 1554-8627. ; 8:4, s. 445-544
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.
|
|
| 4. |
- Knævelsrud, Helene, et al.
(författare)
-
Membrane remodeling by the PX-BAR protein SNX18 promotes autophagosome formation
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cell Biology. - : Rockefeller University Press. - 0021-9525 .- 1540-8140. ; 202:2, s. 331-349
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The membrane remodeling events required for autophagosome biogenesis are still poorly understood. Because PX domain proteins mediate membrane remodeling and trafficking, we conducted an imaging-based siRNA screen for autophagosome formation targeting human PX proteins. The PX-BAR protein SNX18 was identified as a positive regulator of autophagosome formation, and its Drosophila melanogaster homologue SH3PX1 was found to be required for efficient autophagosome formation in the larval fat body. We show that SNX18 is required for recruitment of Atg16L1-positive recycling endosomes to a perinuclear area and for delivery of Atg16L1- and LC3-positive membranes to autophagosome precursors. We identify a direct interaction of SNX18 with LC3 and show that the pro-autophagic activity of SNX18 depends on its membrane binding and tubulation capacity. We also show that the function of SNX18 in membrane tubulation and autophagy is negatively regulated by phosphorylation of S233. We conclude that SNX18 promotes autophagosome formation by virtue of its ability to remodel membranes and provide membrane to forming autophagosomes.
|
|
| 5. |
- O'Farrell, Fergal, et al.
(författare)
-
Two-Tiered Control of Epithelial Growth and Autophagy by the Insulin Receptor and the Ret-Like Receptor, Stitcher
- 2013
-
Ingår i: PLoS biology. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1544-9173 .- 1545-7885. ; 11:7, s. e1001612-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Body size in Drosophila larvae, like in other animals, is controlled by nutrition. Nutrient restriction leads to catabolic responses in the majority of tissues, but the Drosophila mitotic imaginal discs continue growing. The nature of these differential control mechanisms that spare distinct tissues from starvation are poorly understood. Here, we reveal that the Ret-like receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), Stitcher (Stit), is required for cell growth and proliferation through the PI3K-I/TORC1 pathway in the Drosophila wing disc. Both Stit and insulin receptor (InR) signaling activate PI3K-I and drive cellular proliferation and tissue growth. However, whereas optimal growth requires signaling from both InR and Stit, catabolic changes manifested by autophagy only occur when both signaling pathways are compromised. The combined activities of Stit and InR in ectodermal epithelial tissues provide an RTK-mediated, two-tiered reaction threshold to varying nutritional conditions that promote epithelial organ growth even at low levels of InR signaling.
|
|
| 6. |
- Rusten, Tor Erik, et al.
(författare)
-
Fab1 phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate 5-kinase controls trafficking but not silencing of endocytosed receptors.
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Molecular Biology of the Cell. - 1059-1524 .- 1939-4586. ; 17:9, s. 3989-4001
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The trafficking of endocytosed receptors through phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate [PtdIns(3)P]-containing endosomes is thought to attenuate their signaling. Here, we show that the PtdIns(3)P 5-kinase Fab1/PIKfyve controls trafficking but not silencing of endocytosed receptors. Drosophila fab1 mutants contain undetectable phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate levels, show profound increases in cell and organ size, and die at the pupal stage. Mutant larvae contain highly enlarged multivesicular bodies and late endosomes that are inefficiently acidified. Clones of fab1 mutant cells accumulate Wingless and Notch, similarly to cells lacking Hrs, Vps25, and Tsg101, components of the endosomal sorting machinery for ubiquitinated membrane proteins. However, whereas hrs, vps25, and tsg101 mutant cell clones accumulate ubiquitinated cargo, this is not the case with fab1 mutants. Even though endocytic receptor trafficking is impaired in fab1 mutants, Notch, Wingless, and Dpp signaling is unaffected. We conclude that Fab1, despite its importance for endosomal functions, is not required for receptor silencing. This is consistent with the possibility that Fab1 functions at a late stage in endocytic receptor trafficking, at a point when signal termination has occurred.
|
|
| 7. |
- Schmid, Martin R., et al.
(författare)
-
Genetic Screen in Drosophila Larvae Links ird1 Function to Toll Signaling in the Fat Body and Hemocyte Motility
- 2016
-
Ingår i: PLOS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 11:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To understand how Toll signaling controls the activation of a cellular immune response in Drosophila blood cells (hemocytes), we carried out a genetic modifier screen, looking for deletions that suppress or enhance the mobilization of sessile hemocytes by the gain-of-function mutation Toll(10b) (Tl-10b). Here we describe the results from chromosome arm 3R, where five regions strongly suppressed this phenotype. We identified the specific genes immune response deficient 1 (ird1), headcase (hdc) and possibly Rab23 as suppressors, and we studied the role of ird1 in more detail. An ird1 null mutant and a mutant that truncates the N-terminal kinase domain of the encoded Ird1 protein affected the Tl-10b phenotype, unlike mutations that affect the C-terminal part of the protein. The ird1 null mutant suppressed mobilization of sessile hemocytes, but enhanced other Tl-10b hemocyte phenotypes, like the formation of melanotic nodules and the increased number of circulating hemocytes. ird1 mutants also had blood cell phenotypes on their own. They lacked crystal cells and showed aberrant formation of lamellocytes. ird1 mutant plasmatocytes had a reduced ability to spread on an artificial substrate by forming protrusions, which may explain why they did not go into circulation in response to Toll signaling. The effect of the ird1 mutation depended mainly on ird1 expression in hemocytes, but ird1-dependent effects in other tissues may contribute. Specifically, the Toll receptor was translocated from the cell membrane to intracellular vesicles in the fat body of the ird1 mutant, and Toll signaling was activated in that tissue, partially explaining the Tl-10b-like phenotype. As ird1 is otherwise known to control vesicular transport, we conclude that the vesicular transport system may be of particular importance during an immune response.
|
|
| 8. |
- Schultz, Sebastian, et al.
(författare)
-
HIAPP and hproIAPP triggers elective autophagy and inhibit the neuro-protective effect of autophagy
- 2010
-
Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: Amyloid formation is associated with cell death and islet amyloid is thought to participate in the 50-60% β-cell reduction detected in patients with type 2 diabetes. Islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) is the main amyloid protein in the islets of Langerhans. Initial IAPP-amyloid formation is intracellular and part of this amyloid constitutes of proIAPP. Material & methods: We have established a new model in Drosophila melanogaster where expression of hproIAPP and IAPP results in the formation of amyloid. With this model, we have investigated the effect of protein aggregation on pathways such as ER-stress, unfolded protein response (UPR), apoptosis and autophagy. Important steps in the different pathways were manipulated by RNAi-technique or over- expression of endogenous Drosophila proteins. Results: Expression of hproIAPP and hIAPP driven to the pdf-neurons led to cell death, but this was without activation of ER-stress, UPR or apoptosis. Aggregated hproIAPP and IAPP, labeled with antibodies against ubiquitin and p62 were accumulated intracellular, a finding that points to an involvement of autophagy. HproIAPP and hIAPP were shown to exert their toxic activity by an intracellular mechanism in contrary to Aβ42 and Aβ42 E22G that exhibit an extracellular toxic activity. Conclusion: Studies on toxicity suggest that hproIAPP and hIAPP aggregates can occupy the autophagy pathway and prevent maintenance of basal cellular homeostasis. Comparison of proIAPP/IAPP and Aβ42 toxicity shows that amyloid proteins of separate origin can exhibit different toxicity.
|
|
