| 1. |
- Duncanson, Laura, et al.
(författare)
-
Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Remote Sensing of Environment. - : Elsevier BV. - 0034-4257 .- 1879-0704. ; 270
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) is collecting spaceborne full waveform lidar data with a primary science goal of producing accurate estimates of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD). This paper presents the development of the models used to create GEDI's footprint-level (~25 m) AGBD (GEDI04_A) product, including a description of the datasets used and the procedure for final model selection. The data used to fit our models are from a compilation of globally distributed spatially and temporally coincident field and airborne lidar datasets, whereby we simulated GEDI-like waveforms from airborne lidar to build a calibration database. We used this database to expand the geographic extent of past waveform lidar studies, and divided the globe into four broad strata by Plant Functional Type (PFT) and six geographic regions. GEDI's waveform-to-biomass models take the form of parametric Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) models with simulated Relative Height (RH) metrics as predictor variables. From an exhaustive set of candidate models, we selected the best input predictor variables, and data transformations for each geographic stratum in the GEDI domain to produce a set of comprehensive predictive footprint-level models. We found that model selection frequently favored combinations of RH metrics at the 98th, 90th, 50th, and 10th height above ground-level percentiles (RH98, RH90, RH50, and RH10, respectively), but that inclusion of lower RH metrics (e.g. RH10) did not markedly improve model performance. Second, forced inclusion of RH98 in all models was important and did not degrade model performance, and the best performing models were parsimonious, typically having only 1-3 predictors. Third, stratification by geographic domain (PFT, geographic region) improved model performance in comparison to global models without stratification. Fourth, for the vast majority of strata, the best performing models were fit using square root transformation of field AGBD and/or height metrics. There was considerable variability in model performance across geographic strata, and areas with sparse training data and/or high AGBD values had the poorest performance. These models are used to produce global predictions of AGBD, but will be improved in the future as more and better training data become available.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ehlers, Sarah, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessing Error Correlations in Remote Sensing-Based Estimates of Forest Attributes for Improved Composite Estimation
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Remote Sensing. - : MDPI AG. - 2072-4292. ; 10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Today, non-expensive remote sensing (RS) data from different sensors and platforms can be obtained at short intervals and be used for assessing several kinds of forest characteristics at the level of plots, stands and landscapes. Methods such as composite estimation and data assimilation can be used for combining the different sources of information to obtain up-to-date and precise estimates of the characteristics of interest. In composite estimation a standard procedure is to assign weights to the different individual estimates inversely proportional to their variance. However, in case the estimates are correlated, the correlations must be considered in assigning weights or otherwise a composite estimator may be inefficient and its variance be underestimated. In this study we assessed the correlation of plot level estimates of forest characteristics from different RS datasets, between assessments using the same type of sensor as well as across different sensors. The RS data evaluated were SPOT-5 multispectral data, 3D airborne laser scanning data, and TanDEM-X interferometric radar data. Studies were made for plot level mean diameter, mean height, and growing stock volume. All data were acquired from a test site dominated by coniferous forest in southern Sweden. We found that the correlation between plot level estimates based on the same type of RS data were positive and strong, whereas the correlations between estimates using different sources of RS data were not as strong, and weaker for mean height than for mean diameter and volume. The implications of such correlations in composite estimation are demonstrated and it is discussed how correlations may affect results from data assimilation procedures.
|
|
| 3. |
- Grafström, Anton, et al.
(författare)
-
Efficient sampling strategies for forest inventories by spreading the sample in auxiliary space
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Canadian Journal of Forest Research. - : Canadian Science Publishing. - 0045-5067 .- 1208-6037. ; 44, s. 1156-1164
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- By using more sophisticated sampling designs in forest field inventories, it is possible to select more representative field samples. When full cover auxiliary information is available at the planning stage of a forest inventory, an efficient strategy for sampling is formed by making sure that the sample is well spread in the space spanned by the auxiliary variables. We show that by using such a sampling design, we can improve not only design-based estimation, but also estimation based on nearest neighbour techniques. A new technique to select well-spread probability samples, in multidimensional spaces, from larger populations is introduced. As an application, we illustrate how this strategy can be applied to a forest field inventory. We use an artificial dataset corresponding to a full cover forest remote sensing inventory of a 30 000 ha area of Kuortane, western Finland. The target variable (growing stock volume) has been generated for the entire area by a copula technique. The artificial population has been validated by utilizing the Finnish National Forest Inventory.
|
|
| 4. |
- Grafström, Anton, et al.
(författare)
-
The continuous population approach to forest inventories and use of information in the design
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Environmetrics. - : Wiley. - 1180-4009 .- 1099-095X. ; 28
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- An extended theoretical framework for the continuous population approach to forest inventories is derived. Here, we treat a simultaneous selection of sample points with any prescribed sampling intensity over a continuous population. Different ways to use available auxiliary information, for example, from remote sensing, by selection of approximately balanced or spatially balanced samples are considered. A large data set of spatially continuous individual tree-level data is used to demonstrate the potential of these theoretical approaches. This study shows new ways to integrate remote sensing information in designs for forest inventory applications, which can significantly reduce the variance of the Horvitz-Thompson estimator for target variables related to the auxiliary information.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Petersson, Hans, et al.
(författare)
-
Using heterogeneity indices to adjust basal area - Leaf area index relationship in managed coniferous stands
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Forest Ecology and Management. - : Elsevier BV. - 0378-1127 .- 1872-7042. ; 458
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The structure of contemporary managed forests is complex and deviates from experimental forests which are usually even-aged monocultures and single-storied. To apply theoretical growth and yield functions on managed forests, adjustments are required, especially for leaf area index (LAI) which is a key biophysical variable in process-based growth models. To asses this, the performance of canopy LAI in modelling the basal area (BA) of managed boreal forests dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies (L). Karst) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) was investigated by heterogeneity analysis. The study was based on the assumption that canopy LAI and BA are strongly related and are vital for estimating stand productivity and growth. Managed forests were represented by field data from the 2016 and 2017 Swedish National Forest Inventory (NFI) campaigns. Species-specific LAI conversion parameters were applied on the general plant area index (PAD values from hemispheric fish-eye photos taken from the permanent and temporary NFI sample plots. The heterogeneity analysis was studied in two parts by: (a) ground-based stand structural heterogeneity (SSH) described by species composition, coefficient of tree diameter variation, tree social status and height-diameter ratio, and (b) spectral heterogeneity (SPH) by vegetation and textural indices developed from Sentinel-2. Species-specific final (with heterogeneity metrics) and base (without heterogeneity metrics) models were fitted for BA-LAI and BA-PM relationships by nonlinear least squares and generalised additive regression functions, respectively. The performance of models was assessed by the root-mean-squared error (RMSE, m(2)ha(-1)) and the relative root-mean-squared error (ReIRMSE, %) metrics. For both species, BA-LAI final models (FMs) accounting for heterogeneity resulted in larger explained variance than the base models (BMs). Compared with the BMs, FMs with SSH reduced the variance by 55% in Norway spruce (RMSE = 3.33, ReIRMSE = 15.39) and 43% in Scots pine (RMSE = 3.70, ReIRMSE = 17.38). The fit between BA-LAI with SPH also showed an improvement for Norway spruce (RMSE = 5.56) and Scots pine (RMSE = 5.66) over the BMs, suggesting the potential use of Sentinel-2 in future growth models. The results of the study suggest that in growth models when extrapolating theoretical growth functions to managed forests, there is a need to calibrate the models with the forest structural heterogeneity. This is important for drawing realistic conclusions from growth and yield modelling of managed stands of Norway spruce and Scots pine.
|
|
| 7. |
- Saarela, Svetlana, et al.
(författare)
-
A new prediction-based variance estimator for two-stage model-assisted surveys of forest resources
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Remote Sensing of Environment. - : Elsevier BV. - 0034-4257 .- 1879-0704. ; 192, s. 1-11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Forest resource assessments utilizing remotely sensed auxiliary data are becoming increasingly important due to their ability to provide precise estimates of forest parameters at low cost. In presenting results from such surveys, it is important to provide not only estimates of the target parameters, but also their confidence intervals, which provide the range of values wherein the true value is located with a certain level of confidence. If such an interval is narrow the point estimates from the survey can be considered very reliable. In estimating the confidence interval the variance of an estimator must first be estimated. Unbiasedness, i.e. that an estimator on average coincides with the true value, is an important property also for variance estimators. Another important property is that the variance estimator itself has low variance, not least in cases when the variance estimates obtained with the estimator may not be strictly positive. One such important case is when two-stage designs are used to first allocate sample clusters in the form of strips from which auxiliary data, such as metrics derived from airborne laser scanning, are obtained; field data are then derived from sample plots beneath each sample strip in a second stage. In this article we compare two variance estimators for such surveys. The first estimator is a standard estimator suggested in reference textbooks on model-assisted sampling. The second estimator is proposed by the authors, and utilizes the auxiliary data to a larger extent. Through Monte Carlo simulation we show that both variance estimators are approximately unbiased, but that the new estimator is more stable (i.e., has lower empirical variance) and provides empirical confidence interval coverage rates that coincide more closely with the nominal coverage rates. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 8. |
- Saarela, Svetlana, et al.
(författare)
-
Assessing components of the model-based mean square error estimator for remote sensing assisted forest applications
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Canadian Journal of Forest Research. - : Canadian Science Publishing. - 0045-5067 .- 1208-6037. ; 48, s. 642-649
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Model-based inference is an alternative to probability-based inference for small areas or remote areas for which probability sampling is difficult. Model-based mean square error estimators incorporate three components: prediction covariance, residual variance, and residual covariance. The latter two components are often considered negligible, particularly for large areas, but no thresholds that justify ignoring them have been reported. The objectives of the study were threefold: (i) to compare analytical and bootstrap estimators of model parameter covariances as the primary factors affecting prediction covariance; (ii) to estimate the contribution of residual variance to overall variance; and (iii) to estimate thresholds for residual spatial correlation that justify ignoring this component. Five datasets were used, three from Europe, one from Africa, and one from North America. The dependent variable was either forest volume or biomass and the independent variables were either Landsat satellite image bands or airborne laser scanning metrics. Three conclusions were noteworthy: (i) analytical estimators of the model parameter covariances tended to be biased; (ii) the effects of residual variance were mostly negligible; and (iii) the effects of spatial correlation on residual covariance vary by multiple factors but decrease with increasing study area size. For study areas greater than 75 km(2) in size, residual covariance could generally be ignored.
|
|
| 9. |
- Saarela, Svetlana, et al.
(författare)
-
Combining UAV and Sentinel-2 auxiliary data for forest growing stock volume estimation through hierarchical model-based inference
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Remote Sensing of Environment. - : Elsevier BV. - 0034-4257 .- 1879-0704. ; 204, s. 485-497
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Remotely sensed (RS) data are becoming increasingly important as sources of auxiliary information in forest resource assessments. Data from several satellites providing moderate image resolution are freely available (e.g. Sentinel-2). In addition, very-high-resolution three-dimensional data are available due to the advent of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). The increasing availability of auxiliary data offers new opportunities for largescale forest surveys using UAVs. A recently developed hierarchical model-based mode of inference makes it possible to use hierarchically nested auxiliary data in estimating population properties, such as total or mean biomass or volume, and their corresponding uncertainties in a statistically appropriate manner. In this study, hierarchical model-based inference was used to estimate growing stock volume (GSV; m(3) ha(-1)) and its variance using a small sample of field data, a larger sample of UAV data, and wall-to-wall Sentinel-2 data in a study area in SE Norway. The main objective of the study was to compare the performance, in terms of precision, of hierarchical model-based inference (denoted Case C) against two alternative cases. These were (1) model-based inference based on field data and wall-to-wall data, collected either with airborne laser scanning (Case A.1) or Sentinel-2 data (Case A.2), and (2) hybrid inference using a small sample of field data and a larger sample of UAV data (Case B). A second objective was to assess the possibility of reducing the UAV sampling intensity when adopting Case C rather than 13, without decreasing the precision of the GSV estimates. The results, calculated as standard error as percentage of the mean ((SE) over cap (%)), indicated that in case C the precision was of similar magnitude ((SE) over cap (%) = 3.44%) as for Case A.1 ((SE) over cap (%) = 3.69%) and for Case B ((SE) over cap (%) = 3.58%). The standard error of Case A.2 was nearly twice as large ((SE) over cap (%) = 5.81%) as the rest of the cases. The results also indicated possibilities of reducing the UAV sampling intensity without losing precision in cases where wall-to-wall Sentinel-2 data are available (Case C). The same precision for Case C with only five UAV samples was achieved as for Case B with 55 UAV samples. Thus, the study highlights the cost-efficiency of applications of UAV as in Case C and also provides first insights in the use of Sentinel-2 data for GSV estimation in boreal conditions.
|
|
| 10. |
- Saarela, Svetlana, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparing frameworks for biomass prediction for the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Remote Sensing of Environment. - : Elsevier. - 0034-4257 .- 1879-0704. ; 278
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) mission offers data for temperate and pan-tropical estimates of aboveground forest biomass (AGB). The spaceborne, full-waveform LiDAR from GEDI provides sample footprints of canopy structure, expected to cover about 4% of the land area following two years of operation. Several options are available for estimating AGB at different geographical scales. Using GEDI sample data alone, gridded biomass predictions are based on hybrid inference which correctly propagates errors due to the modeling and accounts for sampling variability, but this method requires at least two GEDI tracks in the area of interest. However, there are significant gaps in GEDI coverage and in some areas of interest GEDI data may need to be combined with other wall-to-wall remotely sensed (RS) data, such as those from multispectral or SAR sensors. In these cases, we may employ hierarchical model-based (HMB) inference that correctly considers the additional model errors that result from relating GEDI data to the wall-to-wall data. Where predictions are possible from both hybrid and HMB inference the question arises which framework to choose, and under what circumstances? In this paper, we make progress towards answering these questions by comparing the performance of the two prediction frameworks under conditions relevant for the GEDI mission. Conventional model-based (MB) inference with wall-to-wall TanDEM-X data was applied as a baseline prediction framework, which does not involve GEDI data at all. An important feature of the study was the comparison of AGB predictors in terms of both standard deviation (SD: the square root of variance) and root mean square error (RMSE: the square root of mean square error – MSE). Since, in model-based inference, the true AGB in an area of interest is a random variable, comparisons of the performance of prediction frameworks should preferably be made in terms of their RMSEs. However, in practice only the SD can be estimated based on empirical survey data, and thus it is important also to study whether or not the difference between the two uncertainty measures is small or large under conditions relevant for the GEDI mission. Our main findings were that: (i) hybrid and HMB prediction typically resulted in smaller RMSEs than conventional MB prediction although the difference between the three frameworks in terms of SD often was small; (ii) in most cases the difference between hybrid and HMB inference was small in terms of both RMSE and SD; (iii) the RMSEs for all frameworks was substantially larger than the SDs in small study areas whereas the two uncertainty measures were similar in large study areas, and; (iv) spatial autocorrelation of model residual errors had a large effect on the RMSEs of AGB predictors, especially in small study areas. We conclude that hybrid inference is suitable in most GEDI applications for AGB assessment, due to its simplicity compared to HMB inference. However, where GEDI data are sparse HMB inference should be preferred.
|
|
