| 1. |
- Hara, Sozaburo, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation vs Placebo Stimulation on Disability in Patients With Chronic Radicular Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: JAMA. - 1538-3598. ; 328:15, s. 1506-1514
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The use of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain after lumbar spine surgery is increasing, yet rigorous evidence of its efficacy is lacking.To investigate the efficacy of spinal cord burst stimulation, which involves the placement of an implantable pulse generator connected to electrodes with leads that travel into the epidural space posterior to the spinal cord dorsal columns, in patients with chronic radiculopathy after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disorders.This placebo-controlled, crossover, randomized clinical trial in 50 patients was conducted at St Olavs University Hospital in Norway, with study enrollment from September 5, 2018, through April 28, 2021. The date of final follow-up was May 20, 2022.Patients underwent two 3-month periods with spinal cord burst stimulation and two 3-month periods with placebo stimulation in a randomized order. Burst stimulation consisted of closely spaced, high-frequency electrical stimuli delivered to the spinal cord. The stimulus consisted of a 40-Hz burst mode of constant-current stimuli with 4 spikes per burst and an amplitude corresponding to 50% to 70% of the paresthesia perception threshold.The primary outcome was difference in change from baseline in the self-reported Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; range, 0 points [no disability] to 100 points [maximum disability]; the minimal clinically important difference was 10 points) score between periods with burst stimulation and placebo stimulation. The secondary outcomes were leg and back pain, quality of life, physical activity levels, and adverse events.Among 50 patients who were randomized (mean age, 52.2 [SD, 9.9] years; 27 [54%] were women), 47 (94%) had at least 1 follow-up ODI score and 42 (84%) completed all stimulation randomization periods and ODI measurements. The mean ODI score at baseline was 44.7 points and the mean changes in ODI score were -10.6 points for the burst stimulation periods and -9.3 points for the placebo stimulation periods, resulting in a mean between-group difference of -1.3 points (95% CI, -3.9 to 1.3 points; P = .32). None of the prespecified secondary outcomes showed a significant difference. Nine patients (18%) experienced adverse events, including 4 (8%) who required surgical revision of the implanted system.Among patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery, spinal cord burst stimulation, compared with placebo stimulation, after placement of a spinal cord stimulator resulted in no significant difference in the change from baseline in self-reported back pain-related disability.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03546738.
|
|
| 2. |
- Helland, Ragnhild Holden, et al.
(författare)
-
Segmentation of glioblastomas in early post-operative multi-modal MRI with deep neural networks.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Scientific reports. - 2045-2322. ; 13:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Extent of resection after surgery is one of the main prognostic factors for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma. To achieve this, accurate segmentation and classification of residual tumor from post-operative MR images is essential. The current standard method for estimating it is subject to high inter- and intra-rater variability, and an automated method for segmentation of residual tumor in early post-operative MRI could lead to a more accurate estimation of extent of resection. In this study, two state-of-the-art neural network architectures for pre-operative segmentation were trained for the task. The models were extensively validated on a multicenter dataset with nearly 1000 patients, from 12 hospitals in Europe and the United States. The best performance achieved was a 61% Dice score, and the best classification performance was about 80% balanced accuracy, with a demonstrated ability to generalize across hospitals. In addition, the segmentation performance of the best models was on par with human expert raters. The predicted segmentations can be used to accurately classify the patients into those with residual tumor, and those with gross total resection.
|
|
| 3. |
- Drewes, Christina, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality of life in patients with intracranial tumors: does tumor laterality matter?
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurosurgery. - 0022-3085. ; 125:6, s. 1400-1407
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE Traditionally, the dominant (usually left) cerebral hemisphere is regarded as the more important one, and everyday clinical decisions are influenced by this view. However, reported results on the impact of lesion laterality are inconsistent in the scarce literature on quality of life (QOL) in patients with brain tumors. The authors aimed to study which cerebral hemisphere is the most important to patients with intracranial tumors with respect to health-related QOL (HRQOL). METHODS Two hundred forty-eight patients with unilateral, unifocal gliomas or meningiomas scheduled for primary surgery were included in this prospective cohort study. Generic HRQOL was measured using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire preoperatively and after 4-6 weeks. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of data were performed. RESULTS Tumor volumes were significantly larger in right-sided tumors at diagnosis, and language or speech problems were more common in left-sided lesions. Otherwise, no differences existed in baseline data. The median EQ-5D-3L index was 0.73 (range -0.24 to 1.00) in patients with right-sided tumors and 0.76 (range -0.48 to 1.00) in patients with left-sided tumors (p = 0.709). Due to the difference in tumor volumes at baseline, histopathology and tumor volumes were matched in 198 patients. EQ-5D-3L index scores in this 1:1 matched analysis were 0.74 (range -0.7 to 1.00) for patients with right-sided and 0.76 (range -0.48 to 1.00) for left-sided lesions (p = 0.342). In the analysis of longitudinal data, no association was found between tumor laterality and postoperative EQ-5D-3L index scores (p = 0.957) or clinically significant change in HRQOL following surgery (p = 0.793). CONCLUSIONS In an overall patient-reported QOL perspective, tumor laterality does not appear to be of significant importance for generic HRQOL in patients with intracranial tumors. This may imply that right-sided cerebral functions are underestimated by clinicians.
|
|
| 4. |
- Sagberg, Lisa M., et al.
(författare)
-
Accuracy of operating neurosurgeons' prediction of functional levels after intracranial tumor surgery.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Neurosurgery. - 0022-3085. ; 126:4, s. 1173-1180
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE In the absence of practical and reliable prognostic tools in intracranial tumor surgery, decisions regarding patient selection, patient information, and surgical management are usually based on neurosurgeons' clinical judgment, which may be influenced by personal experience and knowledge. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of the operating neurosurgeons' predictions about patients' functional levels after intracranial tumor surgery. METHODS In a prospective single-center study, the authors included 299 patients who underwent intracranial tumor surgery between 2011 and 2015. The operating neurosurgeons scored their patients' expected functional level at 30 days after surgery using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS). The expected KPS score was compared with the observed KPS score at 30 days. RESULTS The operating neurosurgeons underestimated their patients' future functional level in 15% of the cases, accurately estimated their functional levels in 23%, and overestimated their functional levels in 62%. When dichotomizing functional levels at 30 days into dependent or independent functional level categories (i.e., KPS score < 70 or ≥ 70), the predictive accuracy was 80%, and the surgeons underestimated and overestimated in 5% and 15% of the cases, respectively. In a dichotomization based on the patients' ability to perform normal activities (i.e., KPS score < 80 or ≥ 80), the predictive accuracy was 57%, and the surgeons underestimated and overestimated in 3% and 40% of cases, respectively. In a binary regression model, the authors found no predictors of underestimation, whereas postoperative complications were an independent predictor of overestimation (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Operating neurosurgeons often overestimate their patients' postoperative functional level, especially when it comes to the ability to perform normal activities at 30 days. This tendency to overestimate surgical outcomes may have implications for clinical decision making and for the accuracy of patient information.
|
|
| 5. |
- Sjåvik, Kristin, et al.
(författare)
-
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in meningioma surgery - a population based comparative effectiveness study of routine mechanical prophylaxis with or without preoperative low molecular weight heparin
- 2016
-
Ingår i: World Neurosurgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1878-8750 .- 1878-8769. ; 88, s. 320-326
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Object: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after intracranial meningioma surgery. To what extent systemic prophylaxis with pharmacotherapy is beneficial with respect to VTE risk, or associated with increased risk of bleeding and postoperative hemorrhage, remains debated. The current study aimed to clarify the risk-benefit of prophylactic pharmacotherapy initiated the evening before craniotomy for meningioma. METHODS: In a Scandinavian population-based cohort we conducted a retrospective review of 979 operations for intracranial meningioma between 2007 and 2013 at three neurosurgical centers with population-based referral. We compared two different treatment strategies analyzing frequencies of VTE and proportions of postoperative intracranial hematomas requiring surgery or intensified subsequent observation or care (ICU or other intensified observation and/or treatment). One neurosurgical center favored preoperative prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) ("LMWH routine group") in addition to mechanical prophylaxis, while two centers favored mechanical prophylaxis with LMWH only given as needed in cases of delayed mobilization ("LMWH as needed group"). RESULTS: In the LMWH routine group, VTE was diagnosed after 24/626 operations (3.9%), while VTE was diagnosed after 11/353 (3.1%) operations in the LMWH as needed group (p=0.56). Clinically relevant postoperative hematomas occurred after 57/626 operations (9.1%) in the LMWH routine group compared to 23/353 (6.5%) in the LMWH as needed group (p=0.16). Surgically evacuated postoperative hematomas occurred after 19/626 operations (3.0%) in the LMWH routine group compared to 8/353 operations (2.3%) in the LMWH as needed group (p=0.26). CONCLUSION: There is no benefit of routine preoperative LMWH starting before intracranial meningioma surgery. Neither could we for primary outcomes detect a significant increase in clinically relevant postoperative hematomas secondary to this regimen. We suggest that "as-needed" perioperative administration of LMWH, reserved for patients with excess risk due to delayed mobilization, is effective and also appears to be the safest strategy.
|
|
