| 1. |
- Fokkema, Marieke L., et al.
(författare)
-
Outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention for different indications : long-term results from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR)
- 2016
-
Ingår i: EuroIntervention. - Toulouse, France : Europa Edition. - 1774-024X .- 1969-6213. ; 12:3, s. 303-311
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcome for different indications for PCI in an unselected, nationwide PCI population at short- and long-term follow-up.Methods and results: We evaluated clinical outcome up to six years after PCI in all patients undergoing a PCI procedure for different indications in Sweden between 2006 and 2010. A total of 70,479 patients were treated for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (21.0%), unstable angina (11.0%), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (36.6%) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (31.4%). Mortality was higher in STEMI patients at one year after PCI (9.6%) compared to NSTEMI (4.7%), unstable angina (2.2%) and stable CAD (2.0%). At one year after PCI until the end of follow-up, the adjusted mortality risk (one to six years after PCI) and the risk of myocardial infarction were comparable between NSTEMI and STEMI patients and lower in patients with unstable angina and stable CAD. The adjusted risk of stent thrombosis and heart failure was highest in STEMI patients.Conclusions: The risk of short-term mortality, heart failure and stent thrombosis is highest for STEMI patients after PCI. Therapies to reduce stent thrombosis and heart failure appear to be most important in decreasing mortality in patients with STEMI or NSTEMI undergoing PCI.
|
|
| 2. |
- Mohammad, Moman A., et al.
(författare)
-
Incidence and outcome of myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention during COVID-19 pandemic
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Heart. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 1355-6037 .- 1468-201X. ; 106:23, s. 1812-1818
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Most reports on the declining incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) during the COVID-19 have either been anecdotal, survey results or geographically limited to areas with lockdowns. We examined the incidence of MI during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, which has remained an open society with a different public health approach fighting COVID-19.METHODS: We assessed the incidence rate (IR) as well as the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of all MI referred for coronary angiography in Sweden using the nationwide Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR), during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden (1 March 2020-7 May 2020) in relation to the same days 2015-2019.RESULTS: A total of 2443 MIs were referred for coronary angiography during the COVID-19 pandemic resulting in an IR 36 MIs/day (204 MIs/100 000 per year) compared with 15 213 MIs during the reference period with an IR of 45 MIs/day (254 MIs/100 000 per year) resulting in IRR of 0.80, 95% CI (0.74 to 0.86), p<0.001. Results were consistent in all investigated patient subgroups, indicating no change in patient category seeking cardiac care. Kaplan-Meier event rates for 7-day case fatality were 439 (2.3%) compared with 37 (2.9%) (HR: 0.81, 95% CI (0.58 to 1.13), p=0.21). Time to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was shorter during the pandemic and PCI was equally performed, indicating no change in quality of care during the pandemic.CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly reduced the incidence of MI referred for invasive treatment strategy. No differences in overall short-term case fatality or quality of care indicators were observed.
|
|
| 3. |
- van der Pals, Jesper, et al.
(författare)
-
Characteristics and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor and novel oral anticoagulants
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Thrombosis Update. - : Elsevier BV. - 2666-5727. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Optimal antithrombotic treatment after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with atrial fibrillation is unclear. Data on outcomes in patients on concomitant ticagrelor and the novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is scarce. This study therefore sought to describe patient characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and ACS treated with concomitant ticagrelor and NOACs (double antithrombotic therapy, DT). Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified all ACS patients with atrial fibrillation on DT upon discharge from Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden, between 2016 and 2019. Identified patients were compared with age and sex matched controls with ACS alone treated with ticagrelor and aspirin (DAPT). Major bleeding was defined in accordance with the HAS-BLED derivation study. Patients were retrospectively followed for six months. Results: In total, 341 patients on DT were identified and compared with 341 controls on DAPT. Mean HAS-BLED bleeding risk score was higher in patients on DT (2.9 ± 1.0 vs 2.6+/0.9 units, p < 0.001; DT vs DAPT). The incidence of major bleeding was higher in patients on DT (31 (9.1%) vs 10 (2.9%), p = 0.001; DT vs DAPT), while a composite of all thrombotic events was found to be similar between the groups (8 (2.3%) vs 5 (1.5%), p = NS; DT vs DAPT). Conclusions: While thrombotic events occur at a similar rate, the bleeding rate is higher in patients with atrial fibrillation and ACS treated with DT than in patients with ACS alone treated with DAPT. Patients with atrial fibrillation also have a higher basal bleeding risk.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Bergman, Sofia, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical Impact of Intraprocedural Stent Thrombosis During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Treated With Potent P2Y12 inhibitors : a VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART Substudy
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Heart Association. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 2047-9980. ; 10:18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The clinical importance of intraprocedural stent thrombosis (IPST) during percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era of potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors is not established. The aim of this study was to assess IPST and its association with clinical outcome in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with contemporary antithromboticmedications.Methods and Results: The VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART study (Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in ST-Segment and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy in the Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies Registry Trial) included 6006 patients with myocardial infarction, treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention. IPST, defined as a new or worsening thrombus related to a stent deployed during the procedure, was reported by the interventional cardiologist in 55 patients (0.9%) and was significantly associated with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presentation, longer stents, bailout glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow <3. The primary composite end point included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, out-of-laboratory definite stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization within 30 days. Secondary end points were major bleeding and the individual components of the primary composite end point. Patients with versus without IPST had significantly higher rates of the primary composite end point (20.0% versus 4.4%), including higher rates of cardiovascular death, target vessel revascularization, and definite stent thrombosis, but not myocardial infarction or major bleeding. By multivariable analysis, IPST was independently associated with the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95% CI, 2.05-7.12; P<0.001).Conclusions: IPST is a rare but dangerous complication during percutaneous coronary intervention, independently associated with poor prognosis, even in the current era of potent antiplatelet agents. Future treatment studies are needed to reduce the rate of IPST and to improve the poor outcome among these patients. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02311231.
|
|
| 6. |
- Braun, Oscar, et al.
(författare)
-
Concomitant use of warfarin and ticagrelor as an alternative to triple antithrombotic therapy after an acute coronary syndrome.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Thrombosis Research. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-2472 .- 0049-3848. ; 135:1, s. 26-30
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Treatment with warfarin in combination with clopidogrel has been shown to reduce the incidence of major bleeding as compared to triple antithrombotic therapy (TT; warfarin, clopidogrel and aspirin). However, there are uncertainties regarding the risk for thrombosis since poor-responsiveness to clopidogrel is common. Ticagrelor is a more potent platelet inhibitor, but data supporting concurrent use of ticagrelor and warfarin (dual antithrombotic therapy, DT) is limited. This study therefore sought to evaluate the risk of bleeding and thrombosis associated with DT after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
|
|
| 7. |
- Carlsson, Jorg, et al.
(författare)
-
Outcome of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stenting Used According to On- and Off-Label Criteria
- 2009
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY. - : Elsevier BV. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 53:16, s. 1389-1398
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of bare-metal stents (BMS) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) after on-label as well as off-label use. Background DES lower restenosis rates while not influencing the risk for death and myocardial infarction when used in Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications. It is debated whether the clinical results of this so-called on-label use might be extrapolated to off-label situations. Methods The SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry) was used to investigate the outcomes in 17,198 patients who underwent stenting with an on-label indication (10,431 BMS and 6,767 DES patients) and 16,355 patients in the context of an off-label indication (9,907 BMS and 6,448 DES patients). The patients were included from 2003 to 2005 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year and a maximum of 4 years. The analysis was adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. Results There were not significant differences between on-label DES and BMS (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 0.92 to 1.13) or between off-label DES and BMS (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.87 to 1.04) use with regard to the incidence of myocardial infarction and death. Off-label use of DES did not lead to significant differences in the combined risk of death and myocardial infarction compared with BMS throughout the whole spectrum of clinical indications. Conclusions In contemporary Swedish practice, neither on-nor off-label use of DES is associated with worse outcome than use of BMS.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Erlinge, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Sage Publications. - 2048-8726 .- 2048-8734. ; 8:6, s. 492-501
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The optimal anti-coagulation strategy for patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention is unclear in contemporary clinical practice of radial access and potent P2Y12-inhibitors. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bivalirudin was superior to heparin monotherapy in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction without routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use.METHODS: In a large pre-specified subgroup of the multicentre, prospective, randomised, registry-based, open-label clinical VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial we randomised patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel, to bivalirudin or heparin monotherapy with no planned use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint was the rate of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or major bleeding within 180 days.RESULTS: A total of 3001 patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, were enrolled. The primary endpoint occurred in 12.1% (182 of 1503) and 12.5% (187 of 1498) of patients in the bivalirudin and heparin groups, respectively (hazard ratio of bivalirudin compared to heparin treatment 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.18, p=0.69). The results were consistent in all major subgroups. All-cause death occurred in 2.0% versus 1.7% (hazard ratio 1.15, 0.68-1.94, p=0.61), myocardial infarction in 2.3% versus 2.5% (hazard ratio 0.91, 0.58-1.45, p=0.70), major bleeding in 8.9% versus 9.1% (hazard ratio 0.97, 0.77-1.24, p=0.82) and definite stent thrombosis in 0.3% versus 0.2% (hazard ratio 1.33, 0.30-5.93, p=0.82).CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin as compared to heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction did not reduce the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction or major bleeding in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving current recommended treatments with modern P2Y12-inhibitors and predominantly radial access.
|
|
| 10. |
- Friberg, Hans, et al.
(författare)
-
Internationell och nationell konsensus om bästa vård efter hävt hjärtstopp. Många patienter blir helt återställda.
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Läkartidningen. - 0023-7205 .- 1652-7518. ; 107:8, s. 2-514
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- An international consensus report on postresuscitation care after cardiac arrest has recently been published. Its content and main messages are in line with the recommendations from The Swedish Resuscitation Council, which include: diagnosing and treating the underlying disease, offering good general intensive care, considering hypothermia treatment, standardising prognostication and follow-up.
|
|
