| 1. |
- Akerstrom, Finn, et al.
(författare)
-
Association between catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and mortality or stroke
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Heart. - : BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP. - 1355-6037 .- 1468-201X. ; 110, s. 163-169
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation effectively reduces symptomatic burden. However, its long-term effect on mortality and stroke is unclear. We investigated if patients with atrial fibrillation who undergo catheter ablation have lower risk for all-cause mortality or stroke than patients who are managed medically. Methods We retrospectively included 5628 consecutive patients who underwent first-time catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation between 2008 and 2018 at three major Swedish electrophysiology units. Control individuals with an atrial fibrillation diagnosis but without previous stroke were selected from the Swedish National Patient Register, resulting in a control group of 48 676 patients. Propensity score matching was performed to produce two cohorts of equal size (n=3955) with similar baseline characteristics. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or stroke. Results Patients who underwent catheter ablation were healthier (mean CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score 1.4 +/- 1.4 vs 1.6 +/- 1.5, p<0.001), had a higher median income (288 vs 212 1000 Swedish krona [KSEK]/year, p<0.001) and had more frequently received university education (45.1% vs 28.9%, p<0.001). Mean follow-up was 4.5 +/- 2.8 years. After propensity score matching, catheter ablation was associated with lower risk for the combined primary endpoint (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.69). The result was mainly driven by a decrease in all-cause mortality (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.63), with stroke reduction showing a trend in favour of catheter ablation (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.07). Conclusions Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation was associated with a reduction in the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality or stroke. This result was driven by a marked reduction in all-cause mortality.
|
|
| 2. |
- Blomström-Lundqvist, Carina, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Medication on Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation : The CAPTAF Randomized Clinical Trial
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JAMIA Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. - Chicago : American Medical Association (AMA). - 1067-5027 .- 1527-974X .- 0098-7484 .- 1538-3598. ; 321:11, s. 1059-1068
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- IMPORTANCE Quality of life is not a standard primary outcome in ablation trials, even though symptoms drive the indication. OBJECTIVE To assess quality of life with catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months in patients with atrial fibrillation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized clinical trial at 4 university hospitals in Sweden and 1 in Finland of 155 patients aged 30-70 years with more than 6 months of atrial fibrillation and treatment failure with 1 antiarrhythmic drug or beta-blocker, with 4-year follow-up. Study dateswere July 2008-September 2017. Major exclusionswere ejection fraction <35%, left atrial diameter > 60 mm, ventricular pacing dependency, and previous ablation. INTERVENTIONS Pulmonary vein isolation ablation (n= 79) or previously untested antiarrhythmic drugs (n= 76). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomewas the General Health subscale score (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) at baseline and 12 months, assessed unblinded (range, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]). There were 26 secondary outcomes, including atrial fibrillation burden (% of time) from baseline to 12 months, measured by implantable cardiac monitors. The first 3 months were excluded from rhythm analysis. RESULTS Among 155 randomized patients (mean age, 56.1 years; 22.6% women), 97% completed the trial. Of 79 patients randomized to receive ablation, 75 underwent ablation, including 2 who crossed over to medication and 14 who underwent repeated ablation procedures. Of 76 patients randomized to receive antiarrhythmic medication, 74 received it, including 8 who crossed over to ablation and 43 for whom the first drug used failed. General Health score increased from 61.8 to 73.9 points in the ablation group vs 62.7 to 65.4 points in the medication group (between-group difference, 8.9 points; 95% CI, 3.1-14.7; P=.003). Of 26 secondary end points, 5 were analyzed; 2 were null and 2 were statistically significant, including decrease in atrial fibrillation burden (from 24.9% to 5.5% in the ablation group vs 23.3% to 11.5% in the medication group; difference -6.8%[95% CI, -12.9% to -0.7%]; P=.03). Of the Health Survey subscales, 5 of 7 improved significantly. Most common adverse events were urosepsis (5.1%) in the ablation group and atrial tachycardia (3.9%) in the medication group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation despite use of antiarrhythmic medication, the improvement in quality of life at 12 months was greater for those treated with catheter ablation compared with antiarrhythmic medication. Although the study was limited by absence of blinding, catheter ablation may offer an advantage for quality of life.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Braunschweig, Frieder, et al.
(författare)
-
Paroxysmal regular supraventricular tachycardia: the diagnostic accuracy of the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial interval.
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology. - 1542-474X. ; 16:4, s. 327-335
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial (VA) interval in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and normal baseline electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods: The transesophageal VA interval during tachycardia was recorded in 318 patients (age 45 ± 17 years, 58% female) with PSVT and a normal surface ECG between attacks. Subsequently, all patients underwent an ablation procedure establishing the correct tachycardia diagnosis. Results: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), AV reentrant tachycardia through a concealed accessory pathway (AVRT), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) were found in 213, 95, and 10 cases, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an optimal cutoff for a binary categorization of AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT at ≤80 ms (area under the curve 0.891). Owing to a biphasic distribution, AVNRT was very likely at VA intervals ≤90 ms with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 87%, 91%, and 95%. In the range 91–160 ms the corresponding values for AVRT were 88%, 95%, and 88% (90%, 99%, and 98% in male patients). In the small group with VA intervals >160 ms (n = 29), the diagnosis was less clear (PPV of 67% for AVNRT). Conclusions: In patients with sudden onset regular tachycardia and a normal ECG during sinus rhythm, a transesophageal VA interval of ≤80 ms has the highest diagnostic accuracy to diagnose AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT. Overall, the biphasic distribution of VA intervals suggests considering AVNRT at 90 ms and below and AVRT between 91 and 160 ms (in particular in male patients) while the diagnosis is vague at VA intervals above 160 ms.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Charitakis, Emmanouil, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparing efficacy and safety in catheter ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BMC Medicine. - : BMC. - 1741-7015. ; 20:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is no consensus on the most efficient catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for AF ablation through network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed up to October 5th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA approaches were included. Efficacy was defined as arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. Results: In total, 67 RCTs (n = 9871) comparing 19 different CA strategies were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for PVI with renal denervation (RR: 0.60, CI: 0.38-0.94), PVI with ganglia-plexi ablation (RR: 0.62, CI: 0.41-0.94), PVI with additional ablation lines (RR: 0.8, CI: 0.68-0.95) and PVI in combination with bi-atrial modification (RR: 0.32, CI: 0.11-0.88). Strategies including PVI appeared superior to non-PVI strategies such as electrogram-based approaches. No significant differences in safety were observed. Conclusions: This NMA showed that PVI in combination with additional CA strategies, such as autonomic modulation and additional lines, seem to increase the efficacy of PVI alone. These strategies can be considered in treating patients with AF, since, additionally, no differences in safety were observed. This study provides decision-makers with comprehensive and comparative evidence about the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies.
|
|
| 8. |
- Charitakis, Emmanouil, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparing Efficacy and Safety in Catheter Ablation Strategies for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation : A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Diagnostics. - : MDPI. - 2075-4418. ; 12:2
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), there is no consensus regarding the most efficient CA strategy. The objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for PAF. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL until the final search date, 5 October 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA strategies and methods for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were included. Efficacy was defined as lack of arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of six months. In total, 43 RCTs comparing 11 different CA strategies involving 6701 patients were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased in comparison with PVI with radiofrequency only for the following treatments: PVI with adjuvant ablation (RR: 0.79, CI: 0.65-0.97) and PVI with sympathetic modulation (RR: 0.64, CI: 0.46-0.88). However, PVI with radiofrequency was superior to non-PVI strategies (RR: 1.65, CI: 1.2-2.26). No statistically significant difference was found in safety between different CA strategies. Concerning different PVI strategies, no difference was observed either in efficacy or in safety between tested strategies. This NMA suggests that different PVI strategies are generally similar in terms of efficacy, while PVI with additional ablation or sympathetic modulation may be more effective than PVI alone. This study provides decision-makers with insights into the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies.
|
|
| 9. |
- Charitakis, Emmanouil, 1982-
(författare)
-
Neurohormonal activation, Symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation eligible for radiofrequency ablation
- 2016
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In order to improve the management of patients with AF, a better understanding of patients’ arrhythmia-related symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), as well as a finer grasp of the effect of AF initiation and the revolutionary treatment of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) on neurohormonal balance are of great importance.The aim of this dissertation was to study the effects of RFA and AF initiation on four different neurohormonal systems represented by two cardiac biomarkers: the N-terminal fragment of the proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), the mid-regional fragment of the N-terminal of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP); and two extra-cardiac biomarkers: the C-terminal fragment of the prodromal molecule of arginine vasopressin (copeptin) and the mid-regional portion of pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM). Furthermore, we aimed to correlate objective indicators with the variety of arrhythmiarelated symptoms and HRQoL in patients with AF.We studied 192 consecutive AF patients, eligible for RFA, referred to the University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden between January 2012 and April 2014. Forty-five patients, out of the initially selected sample, were included in the interventional part of the study. Biomarkers were collected from the femoral vein (fv), the coronary sinus (CS) and the left atrium (LA), and from fv immediately and the day after RFA. With regard to the interventional part of the study, 36 patients were randomized to AF initiation and 19 to control group. Biomarkers were retrieved from fv, CS and LA prior to AF initiation (baseline) and 30 minutes later. The Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmia (ASTA) symptom scale was used in order to assess patients’ arrhythmiarelated symptoms. The ASTA HRQoL scale and the generic short-form 36 (SF-36) physical and mental component summaries were used in order to express patients’ disease-specific and overall HRQoL respectively.While analysing the effect of RFA on biomarkers, it was noticed that the level of NTproBNP decreased the day after RFA in participants in AF, compared with the participants in sinus rhythm who showed a slight increase. Regardless of the actual rhythm, the level of MR-proANP showed an increase immediately after RFA was carried out, followed by a decrease the day after. The copeptin level showed a six-fold increase, compared with baseline, immediately after the RFA procedure, while the MR-proADM level increased the day after. The levels of copeptin and MR-proADM were similar in the CS compared to peripheral blood.When it came to the effects of AF initiation on biomarkers, compared with the control group, MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations were increased. Copeptin levels in patients without ischemic heart disease were decreased after the initiation of AF.We also found that signs of anxiety, low-grade inflammation (defined by high-sensitive C-reactive protein levels>3mg/l) and LA dilatation significantly predicted arrhythmiarelated symptoms. Probable depression was the most important predictor of arrhythmiaspecific HRQoL, and obesity and signs of anxiety were the most important predictors of the physical and mental component summaries respectively.AF is a complex arrhythmia that affects the cardiac and extra-cardiac neurohormonal balance directly after its initiation. RFA causes a neurohormonal imbalance not only due to secondary myocardial injury, but also due to other factors such as patient’s actual rhythm, volume overload and procedural stress. Treatable factors such as anxiety, depression and obesity, which can affect HRQoL and symptoms in patients with AF, should be addressed, and possibly a more intensive life style factor modification can be of value.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
