| 1. |
- Abel, Edvard, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Fatigue in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Study of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Association With Radiation Dose to the Cerebellum
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Advances in Radiation Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 2452-1094. ; 7:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Although fatigue is a known side effect in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiation therapy, knowledge regarding long-term fatigue and dose-response relationships to organs at risk is scarce. The aim of this prospective study was to analyze patient-reported fatigue in patients with HNC receiving radiation therapy and to explore any possible association with organ-at-risk doses. Methods and Materials: Patients with HNC referred for curative radiation therapy were eligible for inclusion in the study. To assess patient-reported fatigue, quality of life questionnaires (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-FA12) were distributed before treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months after the start of treatment. Mean dose (Dmean) and near maximum dose (D2%) of the cerebellum and brain stem were evaluated in relation to baseline-adjusted fatigue scores at 3 months. Results: One hundred twenty-six patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy between 2008 and 2010 were available for final analysis. Female sex and age <60 years were associated with higher fatigue at baseline, whereas patients also treated with chemotherapy had reduced physical and emotional fatigue at 6 months. Physical fatigue (QLQ-FA12 scale) increased from baseline up to 3 months (29 vs 59; P < .0001) but showed no difference compared with baseline from 1 to 5 years. Emotional fatigue was significantly lower at 5 years compared with baseline (14 vs 28; P < .0001). Patients with cerebellum Dmean > 3.5 Gy had higher mean physical fatigue scores at 3 months (38 vs 27; P = .036). Conclusions: Although there is a significant increase in fatigue scores for patients with HNC up to 1 year after radiation therapy, this study showed a return to baseline levels at 5 years. A possible association was found between physical fatigue and a higher mean dose to the cerebellum.
|
|
| 2. |
- Abel, Edvard, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact on quality of life of IMRT versus 3-D conformal radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: A case control study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Advances in Radiation Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 2452-1094. ; 2:3, s. 346-353
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective The purpose of this study was to prospectively and longitudinally compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes between head and neck (HN) cancer patients treated with parotid-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and patients treated with 3-dimensional conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT). Methods and materials Before and up to 12 months after treatment, HRQOL was recorded in patients with HN cancer who were referred to the Department of Oncology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital for curative IMRT. The study group's HRQOL was compared with a matched group of patients from previous descriptive HRQOL studies treated with 3D-CRT. Both groups' HRQOL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer QLQ-C30 and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer QLQ-HN35 at 6 time points in the first year after diagnosis. Results Two hundred and seven patients were included, 111 treated with IMRT and 96 matched controls treated with 3D-CRT. Both groups' HRQOL deteriorated during and after treatment. Just after treatment, worse HRQOL scores were observed in the IMRT group regarding insomnia (38 vs 27; P = .032), appetite loss (64 vs 50; P = .019), senses (54 vs 41; P = .017), and coughing (39 vs 26, P = .009). At 12 months, however, significantly better HRQOL scores were observed in the IMRT group regarding problems with dry mouth (72 vs 62; P = .018), pain (28 vs 20; P = .018), sexuality (37 vs 23; P = .016), social contacts (10 vs 6; P = .026), cognitive functioning (79 vs 87; P = .0057), and financial difficulties (12 vs 20; P = .0019). Conclusions This study further supports the hypothesis that the introduction of IMRT has improved the long-term quality of life of HN cancer patients who have been treated with radiation therapy, but might cause more acute side effects. Longer follow-up is needed to study late complications.
|
|
| 3. |
- Abel, Edvard, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-Term Aspects of Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: A 5-Year Longitudinal Follow-up and Comparison with a Normal Population Cohort
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Advances in Radiation Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 2452-1094. ; 5:1, s. 101-110
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2019 The Author(s) Purpose: Knowledge of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy is scarce. Methods and Materials: HRQOL in 126 patients with advanced head and neck cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy was followed longitudinally from diagnosis to 5 years after treatment with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's QLQ-C30, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Head and Neck Cancer Module, and the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. The survivors' HRQOL was compared with an age- and sex-matched normal population cohort. Results: At 5 years, 73 of the 95 surviving patients had completed the study. Significant reductions in general pain (29 vs 12), head and neck (HN) pain (22 vs 14), and feeling ill (20 vs 10) were found, and emotional functioning (70 vs 83) and global quality of life (67 vs 74) improved, compared with baseline values. Conversely, dry mouth (19 vs 56), senses (8 vs 27), teeth problems (10 vs 22), opening mouth (19 vs 56), and sticky saliva (15 vs 40) were markedly worse, although significant improvements had occurred over time after treatment. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores >80 at 5 years indicated good swallowing function. In a subgroup analysis, dry mouth and senses were significantly better in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Comparison to a normal population cohort's HRQOL shows that the study group experienced a wide array of symptoms affecting their quality of life. Conclusions: The results of this large, long-term follow-up study show that a majority of patients report a reasonable quality of life 5 years after treatment and that there seems to be continuous improvement over time. Comparison with a normal population cohort, however, underlines the fact that classical side effects remain, even with improved radiation techniques. Additional emphasis on normal-tissue-sparing radiation therapy is warranted, with close attention devoted to HRQOL outcomes.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Axelsson, Lars, et al.
(författare)
-
Bioelectrical phase angle at diagnosis as a prognostic factor for survival in advanced head and neck cancer.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0937-4477 .- 1434-4726. ; 275:9, s. 2379-2386
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is used to measure the patient's body composition, fat-free mass, phase angle (PA), and standardized phase angle (SPA), which are affected by malnutrition. Low values of PA and SPA have been found to be negative prognostic factors for survival in different types of cancer and other severe diseases. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether PA and SPA can be used to predict survival in head and neck (HN) cancer.One hundred twenty-eight patients with advanced HN cancer treated in Western Sweden 2002-2006 were examined with BIA at diagnosis, and PA and SPA were calculated. Patients' age, gender, tumor site, TNM stage, and performance status were obtained, and weight, height, and BIA were measured. Survival up to 12years was ascertained.The mean PA was 5.85° and the median was 5.91°. Lower PA and SPA values were significantly associated with shorter overall survival in univariate analyses, together with higher age, oral cancer, higher T class, worse performance status, more weight loss before diagnosis, lower: weight, height, BMI, and reactance. Age, performance status, T class, and PA were significant factors for the overall survival in the multivariable analysis. A PA cutoff value at 5.95° provided the best prediction of 5-year survival.PA and SPA at diagnosis are significant factors for survival in patients with advanced HN cancer. They are promising prognostic tools to use in treatment planning; further studies are needed.
|
|
| 6. |
- Axelsson, Lars, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube on swallowing in advanced head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled study.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Head & neck. - : Wiley. - 1097-0347 .- 1043-3074. ; 39:5, s. 908-915
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Dysphagia is common in head and neck cancer. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is used to facilitate nutrition; however, some retrospective studies have indicated that the PEG tube causes dysphagia.A randomized study of patients with head and neck cancer was conducted with up to 10 years of follow-up. Patients were randomized to either the prophylactic PEG tube group (study group) or the common clinical nutritional support group (control group). At each follow-up, a dietician assessed the oral intake, noted the patients' weight, and if the patients used a PEG tube. Dysphagia was also assessed by the quality of life questionnaire, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Head and Neck 35-questions (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35).One hundred thirty-four patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in swallowing function between the groups after 12 months, 24 months, and 8 years based on the EORTC-QLQ-H&N35, the oral intake scale, tube dependence, esophageal intervention, weight, body mass index (BMI), and overall survival.A prophylactic PEG tube can be used without an increased risk of long-term dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2017.
|
|
| 7. |
- Berg, Malin, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
A randomized study comparing the nutritional effects of radiotherapy with cetuximab versus cisplatin in patients with advanced head and neck cancer
- 2024
-
Ingår i: HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK. - 1043-3074 .- 1097-0347. ; 46:4, s. 760-771
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundHead and neck cancer (HNC) patients have a high risk of developing malnutrition. This randomized study aimed to compare the effect of weekly cisplatin or cetuximab combined with radiotherapy on weight loss at 3 months after treatment was started. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of malnutrition using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, feeding tube dependence and health related quality of life from a nutritional perspective.MethodsPatients from the ARTSCAN III study with advanced HNC were assessed for weight, body composition, enteral tube dependence and selected quality-of-life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) at diagnosis and 6 weeks 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation.ResultsOf the 80 patients, 38 and 42 were randomized to receive cetuximab and cisplatin treatment, respectively. There was no significant difference in weight loss at 3 months between the two study groups. However, the cetuximab group had significantly less weight loss, fewer enteral feeding tubes and better physical functioning at the end of treatment but more pain-related problems 3 months after treatment initiation. No differences between the groups were found at 6 and 12 months. The prevalence of malnutrition was not significantly different at any time point.ConclusionThe hypothesized benefit of concomitant treatment with cetuximab over cisplatin regarding the prevalence of malnutrition was not supported by this study.
|
|
| 8. |
- Berg, Malin, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Fatigue in Long-Term Head and Neck Cancer Survivors From Diagnosis Until Five Years After Treatment
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Laryngoscope. - : Wiley. - 0023-852X.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Fatigue due to cancer is a challenging symptom that might be long-lasting after cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to follow the development of fatigue among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients prospectively and longitudinally and to analyze predictors for acute and chronic fatigue. Methods: HNC patients treated with curative intent were included at diagnosis and completed the following questionnaires multiple times, up to 5 years after treatment: the EORTC QLQ-FA12 for fatigue, EORTC QLQ-C30, and HNC-specific EORTC QLQ-H&N35 together with an anxiety and depression questionnaire. Predictors of fatigue were evaluated at 3 months and 5 years after treatment. Results: Of the 311 study participants, 74% responded at the 5-year follow-up. Physical fatigue was significantly worse 3 months after treatment, while emotional and cognitive fatigue were the worst at diagnosis and at 3 months. All fatigue domains were significantly better after 1 year, and the fatigue scores remained stable from 1 until 5 years after treatment. Three months after chemoradiotherapy, physical fatigue was more significant, but no long-term differences due to treatment modalities were found. Depression and anxiety were predictors for chronic emotional fatigue, and local HN pain and swallowing problems were predictors for chronic physical fatigue. Better global quality of life at diagnosis was associated with less physical and emotional fatigue. Conclusion: Fatigue was worst in the short term for HNC patients and improved after 1 year, and long-term fatigue remained stable up to 5 years after treatment. A few predictors for chronic fatigue were found. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 2023. © 2023 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
|
|
| 9. |
- Berg, Malin, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
The effect of age on health-related quality of life for head and neck cancer patients up to 1 year after curative treatment
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Geriatric Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1879-4068. ; 13:1, s. 60-66
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: The aim was to evaluate the effect of age on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), treated with curative intent, in the Western healthcare region of Sweden. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study, 311 HNC patients completed quality of life questionnaires for cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35) and for older patients with cancer (EORT QLQELD14) at diagnosis and 3, 6, and 12 months after start of treatment. Mean scores for patients >_70 years old were compared to younger patients (50 to 69 years old) to assess differences in HRQOL. Results: Of the 311 study participants, 105 patients were >_70 years old (median age 76.7), of which 32 were >_80 years of age. Most HRQOL scores were equal or better for older adult patients at 3 months after treatment, but physical function was better for younger adult patients up to 12 months after treatment. At 6 months the HRQOL was similar (older patients had less appetite loss and financial difficulties), while the oldest patients (>_80 years) had worse fatigue, role function, and feeling ill at 12 months. For the EORTC-ELD-14 questionnaire, older patients scored better for worries at diagnosis and reported more difficulties in maintaining purpose at 12 months after treatment. Conclusion: When curative treatment is administered, older adult patients with HNC have similar or even better HRQOL compared to younger adult patients, except for physical function, during the first year. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 10. |
- Hammerlid, Eva, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Health-related quality of life three years after diagnosis of head and neck cancer : A longitudinal study
- 2001
-
Ingår i: Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. - 1043-3074. ; 23:2, s. 113-125
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose. To examine health-related quality of life (HRQL) of all head and neck cancer patients from diagnosis until 3 years later and to analyze its dependence on tumor site and other patient characteristics. Subjects and Methods. Two hundred thirty-two patients (mean age 61 years; 70% men) were included and followed with clinical measures and mailed standardized HRQL questionnaires (The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-80 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC QLQ-Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ-H&N35), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results. After 3 years 66 % of the patients were alive and 88 % of these completed the study. The HRQL was worse during treatment and returned slowly thereafter to pretreatment values with few exceptions. After 3 years the best improvement was found for mental distress, followed by a significant global quality of life improvement and reduced pain compared with diagnosis. A significant deterioration was found for problems with dry mouth, senses, and teeth, as well as for opening the mouth wide tie, they seemed to be related to the treatment given). There were few significant improvements between the 1- and 3-year follow-ups. Depression and physical functioning at diagnosis were independent predictors for global quality of life at 3 years. Patients who died during the study had a worse HRQL at diagnosis compared with patients completing the study. Patients with advanced disease (stage III + IV) scored worse than patients with small tumors for most of the HRQL domains. These differences increased over time. Few differences were found relating to gender and age. The pharyngeal cancer group scored worse compared with the other tumor sites, and these patients would probably benefit from a rehabilitation program right from diagnosis, including treatment for malnutrition and pain. Conclusions. The largest HRQL changes for head and neck cancer patients are seen within the first year after diagnosis, with a significant deterioration just after finishing treatment. Thereafter, most of the variables return to pretreatment values. The significant problems with dry mouth, senses, and teeth after treatment are constant over time. (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
|
|
