| 1. |
- Afshari, Kevin, et al.
(författare)
-
Loop-ileostomy reversal in a 23-h stay setting is safe with high patient satisfaction
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 0036-5521 .- 1502-7708. ; 56:9, s. 1126-1130
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: This study aimed to determine whether day-case closure of loop ileostomy with discharge within 23 h was both feasible and accepted by patients.Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective pilot study where selected rectal cancer patients with diverting loop ileostomy underwent stoma closure in a 23-h stay setting. Patients were followed up on the third, seventh, and 30th postoperative day and phoned daily during the first week. A comparable group of 30 patients who underwent standard in-hospital stoma closure prior to the start of the study were selected retrospectively as historical controls.Results: In total, 30 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 41-79 years) were included. All patients met discharge criteria and were discharged within 23 h of surgery, except one. In total, seven patients (23%) were admitted. Two of these patients underwent laparotomy because of anastomotic leakage and small bowel obstruction, respectively. The mean total length of stay was 1.7 days. Most patients (87%) were satisfied with the treatment without feeling neglected or anxious and preferred the 23-h stay setting. In the control group, the mean length of stay was 5 days. Seven patients (23%) were readmitted. Two of these patients underwent laparotomy because of small bowel obstruction and abscess, respectively.Conclusion: Ileostomy closure in a 23-h stay setting in selected patients with meticulous follow up is feasible and safe with high patient satisfaction.
|
|
| 2. |
- Afshari, Kevin, et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic factors for survival in stage IV rectal cancer: A Swedish nationwide case–control study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0960-7404 .- 1879-3320. ; 29, s. 102-106
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: The aim was to identify patient-, tumor- and treatment-related prognostic factors for five-year survival in rectal cancer patients with synchronous stage IV disease. Material and methods: This nationwide case-control study was based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry with supplementary information from medical records and the Swedish Inpatient Registry during the period 2000–2008. All resected rectal cancer patients with synchronous metastases that survived more than five years were included as cases. The control group consisted of corresponding patients who lived less than five years, matched in a 1:2 based on gender, age, resection of the rectal tumor, and the study period. Results: A total of 405 patients were identified; 99 long-term survivors (LTS) and 182 short-term survivors (STS). Patient-related factors of symptoms and comorbidity did not differ between LTS and STS. Among the treatment-related factors, multiple site metastases (p = 0.007), bilobar liver metastasis (p = 0.002), and increasing number of liver metastasis (p < 0.001) were associated with STS. Prognostic treatment-related factors were preoperative radiotherapy (p = 0.001), metastasectomy (p < 0.001), and radical resection of the primary tumor (p = 0.014). In the multivariable analysis, the single most important factor for becoming a LTS was a metastasectomy (hazard ratio: 8.474, 95% confidence interval: 4.098–17.543). Conclusions: The most important prognostic factor for long-term survival in patients with stage IV rectal cancer was metastasectomy, especially liver surgery. With thorough selection of patients for metastasectomy more patients with metastasized rectal cancer may survive beyond five years. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
|
|
| 3. |
- Afshari, Kevin, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk factors for small bowel obstruction after open rectal cancer resection
- 2021
-
Ingår i: BMC Surgery. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1471-2482 .- 1471-2482. ; 21:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is observed in around 10% of patients with prior open abdominal surgery. Rectal resection causes the highest readmission rates. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for readmission for SBO and causes for SBO in patients who needed surgery following rectal cancer surgery.Methods: A population-based registry with prospectively gathered data on 752 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent open pelvic surgery between January 1996 and January 2017 was used. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed, and the risk of SBO was assessed.Results: In total, 84 patients (11%) developed SBO after a median follow-up time of 48 months. Of these patients, 57% developed SBO during the 1st year after rectal cancer surgery. Surgery for SBO was performed in 32 patients (4.3%), and the cause of SBO was stoma-related in one-fourth of these patients. In the univariable analysis previous RT and re-laparotomy were found as risk factors for readmission for SBO. Re-laparotomy was an independent risk factor for readmission for SBO (OR 2.824, CI 1.129-7.065, P = 0.026) in the multivariable analysis, but not for surgery for SBO. Rectal resection without anastomoses, splenic flexors mobilization, intraoperative bleeding, operative time were not found as risk factors for SBO.Conclusions: One-tenth of rectal cancer patients who had open surgery developed SBO, most commonly within the 1st postoperative year. The risk of SBO is greatest in patients with complications after rectal cancer resection that result in a re-laparotomy.
|
|
| 4. |
- Afshari, Kevin
(författare)
-
Surgical Aspects and Prognostic Factors in the Management of Rectal Cancer
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Survival among patients with stage IV rectal cancer is poor and surgical treatment for this disease is associated with morbidities such as small bowel obstruction, complications with a diverting loop ileostomy, and functional bowel disturbances. The overall aim of this thesis was to assess risk factors and morbidity after surgery for rectal cancer and to evaluate factors affecting survival in patients with stage IV rectal cancer.Paper I a prospective study on patients with rectal cancer with loop ileostomy who underwent stoma closure in a 23-hour hospital stay setting. Results were compared with a group who underwent standard in-hospital stoma closure prior to the start of the study, selected retrospectively as controls. No differences were found in the number of complications or the frequency of re-hospitalization or re-operation, indicating that ileostomy closure in a 23-hour hospital stay setting in these selected patients was feasible and safe with high patient satisfaction.Paper II a population-based study with data gathered prospectively. In total, 11% of the patients developed small bowel obstruction (SBO), mostly during the first year after rectal cancer surgery. Surgical treatment for SBO was performed in 4.2% of the patients, and the mechanism was stoma-related in one-fourth. Rectal resection without anastomoses, age, morbidity, and previous radiotherapy (RT) was not associated with admission to the hospital or surgery for SBO. Re-laparotomy due to complications after rectal cancer surgery was an independent risk factor for admission for treating SBO.Paper III a population-based study with data gathered prospectively on bowel function at 1 year after anterior resection or stoma reversal. No associations were found between any defecatory dysfunction and the part of the colon used for anastomosis, the level of the vascular tie, or gender. An association was observed between higher anastomotic level and a lower risk of incontinence and clustering. At 1 year after loop ileostomy closure, the risks of incontinence, clustering, and urgency increased by up to fourfold.Paper IV a case-control study aiming to identify patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related prognostic factors for 5-year survival in patients with rectal cancer with synchronous stage IV disease. Patient-related factors did not differ between groups. Among the tumor-related factors, multiple site metastases, bilobar liver metastases, and increasing numbers of liver metastases were associated with poor survival. Prognostic treatment-related factors were preoperative RT, metastasectomy, and radical resection of the primary tumor. The most important prognostic factor for long-term survival was metastasectomy.
|
|
| 5. |
- Almer, Sven, 1953-, et al.
(författare)
-
Leukocyte scintigraphy compared to intraoperative small bowel enteroscopy and laparotomy findings in Crohn's disease
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1078-0998 .- 1536-4844. ; 13:2, s. 164-174
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Leukocyte scintigraphy is a noninvasive investigation to assess inflammation. We evaluated the utility of labeled leukocytes to detect small bowel inflammation and disease complications in Crohn's disease and compared it to whole small bowel enteroscopy and laparotomy findings.Methods: Scintigraphy with technetium-99m exametazime-labeled leukocytes was prospectively performed in 48 patients with Crohn's disease a few days before laparotomy; 41 also had an intraoperative small bowel enteroscopy. The same procedures were performed in 8 control patients. Independent grading of scans was compared with the results of enteroscopy and with surgical, histopathologic, and clinical data.Results: In the 8 control patients leukocyte scan, endoscopy, and histopathology were all negative for the small bowel. In patients with Crohn's disease and small bowel inflammation seen at enteroscopy and/or laparotomy (n = 39) the scan was positive in 33. In 8 patients without macroscopic small bowel inflammation, the scan was positive for the small bowel in 3 patients; at histology, 2 of 3 had inflammation. When combining results for patients and controls, the sensitivity of leukocyte scan for macroscopically evident small bowel inflammation was 0.85, specificity 0.81, accuracy 0.84, positive predictive value 0.92, and negative predictive value 0.68. Scintigraphy detected inflammatory lesions not known before laparotomy in 16 of 47 (34%) Crohn's disease patients and showed uptake in 25 of 35 (71%) bowel strictures. It was diagnostic regarding 4 of 8 abscesses and 9 of 15 fistulas. In 6 patients (13%) lesions first demonstrated by leukocyte scintigraphy were treated during the surgery performed.Conclusions: Leukocyte scintigraphy reliably detects small bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease. It gives additional information on the presence of inflammatory lesions in a fraction of patients planned for surgery.
|
|
| 6. |
- Birgisson, Helgi, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of Centralization of Colorectal Surgery on the Outcome of Patients with Distal Sigmoid Colonic Cancer
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Digestive Surgery. - : S. Karger AG. - 0253-4886 .- 1421-9883. ; 26:2, s. 169-175
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In 1996, all colorectal surgery in the county of Västmanland, Sweden, was centralized to the central District Hospital in Västerås. A Colorectal Unit was established and modern surgical procedures were introduced. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome for patients treated surgically for distal sigmoid colonic cancer before and after the centralization. Methods: Hospital records of all patients with distal sigmoid colonic cancer, treated between 1991-1995, group 1 (n = 64), and 1996-2000, group 2 (n = 82), were studied retrospectively. Results: In group 2, there were fewer reoperations (n = 0) than in group 1 (n = 6; p = 0.005) and the postoperative mortality was lower; one in group 2 compared with five in group 1 (p = 0.047). The amount of lymph nodes examined were higher and the length of distal surgical margin longer in group 2. Curatively treated patients in group 2 had better overall survival compared to group 1 (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.93). Conclusion: Centralization of colorectal surgery resulted in an improvement of pathologic specimens and a decrease in postoperative reoperations and mortality in patients treated surgically for distal sigmoid colonic cancer. Moreover, the overall survival of curatively treated patients was improved.
|
|
| 7. |
- Birgisson, Helgi, et al.
(författare)
-
The correlation between a family history of colorectal cancer and survival of patients with colorectal cancer
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Familial Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1389-9600 .- 1573-7292. ; 8:4, s. 555-561
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The purpose was to analyze survival of patients with colorectal cancer and a positive family history for colorectal cancer in first degree relatives compared with those with no such family history and to determine whether differences in survival could be explained by known clinico-pathological factors. During 2000-2003, 318 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer answered a written questionnaire about their family history for colorectal cancer. During a 6-year follow-up, recurrences and survival were registered. Thirty-one (10%) patients had a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer, moreover two patients fulfilled the criteria of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and were excluded. Patients with a first-degree relative with colorectal cancer had better survival and lower risk for recurrences compared to those with no relatives with colorectal cancer. In a multivariate analysis including age, gender, stage of disease, tumor differentiation, vascular invasion and family history, patients with first-degree relatives with colorectal cancer had lower risks for death (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17-0.78) and death from cancer (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.08-0.80), compared to those with a no relative with colorectal cancer. The differences were seen in patients with colon cancer but not rectal cancer. Family history for colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative is an individual prognostic factor in patients with colon cancer and could not be explained by known clinico-pathological factors. The value of family history taking in patients with colon cancer is therefore not only to identify families with hereditary colorectal cancer, but also to add information to the prognosis of the patients.
|
|
| 8. |
- Buunen, Mark, et al.
(författare)
-
Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.
- 2009
-
Ingår i: The lancet oncology. - 1474-5488 .- 1470-2045. ; 10:1, s. 44-52
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been proven safe, but debate continues over whether the available long-term survival data justify implementation of laparoscopic techniques in surgery for colon cancer. The aim of the COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection (COLOR) trial was to compare 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival after laparoscopic and open resection of solitary colon cancer. METHODS: Between March 7, 1997, and March 6, 2003, patients recruited from 29 European hospitals with a solitary cancer of the right or left colon and a body-mass index up to 30 kg/m(2) were randomly assigned to either laparoscopic or open surgery as curative treatment in this non-inferiority randomised trial. Disease-free survival at 3 years after surgery was the primary outcome, with a prespecified non-inferiority boundary at 7% difference between groups. Secondary outcomes were short-term morbidity and mortality, number of positive resection margins, local recurrence, port-site or wound-site recurrence, and blood loss during surgery. Neither patients nor health-care providers were blinded to patient groupings. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00387842. FINDINGS: During the recruitment period, 1248 patients were randomly assigned to either open surgery (n=621) or laparoscopic surgery (n=627). 172 were excluded after randomisation, mainly because of the presence of distant metastases or benign disease, leaving 1076 patients eligible for analysis (542 assigned open surgery and 534 assigned laparoscopic surgery). Median follow-up was 53 months (range 0.03-60). Positive resection margins, number of lymph nodes removed, and morbidity and mortality were similar in both groups. The combined 3-year disease-free survival for all stages was 74.2% (95% CI 70.4-78.0) in the laparoscopic group and 76.2% (72.6-79.8) in the open-surgery group (p=0.70 by log-rank test); the difference in disease-free survival after 3 years was 2.0% (95% CI -3.2 to 7.2). The hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (open vs laparoscopic surgery) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.74-1.15). The combined 3-year overall survival for all stages was 81.8% (78.4-85.1) in the laparoscopic group and 84.2% (81.1-87.3) in the open-surgery group (p=0.45 by log-rank test); the difference in overall survival after 3 years was 2.4% (95% CI -2.1 to 7.0; HR 0.95 [0.74-1.22]). INTERPRETATION: Our trial could not rule out a difference in disease-free survival at 3 years in favour of open colectomy because the upper limit of the 95% CI for the difference just exceeded the predetermined non-inferiority boundary of 7%. However, the difference in disease-free survival between groups was small and, we believe, clinically acceptable, justifying the implementation of laparoscopic surgery into daily practice. Further studies should address whether laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in this setting.
|
|
| 9. |
- Chabok, Abbas, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence of fecal carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in patients with acute surgical abdominal infections
- 2010
-
Ingår i: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY. - : Informa Healthcare. - 0036-5521 .- 1502-7708. ; 45:10, s. 1203-1210
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective. Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide. The aims of the current study were to determine the fecal carriage of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic treatment in surgical patients admitted to hospital due to acute intra-abdominal infections. Materials and methods. Eight Swedish surgical units participated in this prospective multicenter investigation. Rectal swabs were obtained on admission to hospital. Cultures were performed on chromogenic agar and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the disk diffusion method. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)phenotype was confirmed by Etest. Results. Rectal samples were obtained and analyzed from 208 patients with intra-abdominal surgical infections. Surgery was performed in 134 patients (65%). Cephalosporins were the most frequently used empirical antibiotic therapy. The highest rates of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae were detected for ampicillin (54%), tetracycline (26%), cefuroxime (26%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (20%). The prevalence of decreased susceptibility (I + R) for the other antibiotics tested was for ciprofloxacin 20%, piperacillin-tazobactam 17%, cefotaxime 14%, ertapenem 12%, gentamicin 3% and imipenem 0%. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were found in samples from 10 patients (5%). Three patients had five E. coli isolates producing AmpC enzymes. Conclusions. This study shows a high rate of resistance among Enterobacteriaceae against antibiotics which are commonly used in Sweden and should have implications for the future choice of antibiotics for surgical patients.
|
|
| 10. |
- Chabok, Abbas, et al.
(författare)
-
Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis
- 2012
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 99:4, s. 532-539
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The standard of care for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis today is antibiotic treatment, although there are no controlled studies supporting this management. The aim was to investigate the need for antibiotic treatment in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, with the endpoint of recovery without complications after 12 months of follow-up. Methods: This multicentre randomized trial involving ten surgical departments in Sweden and one in Iceland recruited 623 patients with computed tomography-verified acute uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis. Patients were randomized to treatment with (314 patients) or without (309 patients) antibiotics. Results: Age, sex, body mass index, co-morbidities, body temperature, white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level on admission were similar in the two groups. Complications such as perforation or abscess formation were found in six patients (1.9 per cent) who received no antibiotics and in three (1.0 per cent) who were treated with antibiotics (P = 0.302). The median hospital stay was 3 days in both groups. Recurrent diverticulitis necessitating readmission to hospital at the 1-year follow-up was similar in the two groups (16 per cent, P = 0.881). Conclusion: Antibiotic treatment for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis neither accelerates recovery nor prevents complications or recurrence. It should be reserved for the treatment of complicated diverticulitis.
|
|
