| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Jungedal, R, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence of anti-drug antibodies against interferon beta has decreased since routine analysis of neutralizing antibodies became clinical practice
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). - : SAGE Publications. - 1477-0970 .- 1352-4585. ; 18:12, s. 1775-1781
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against interferon beta (IFNβ) lead to loss of treatment efficacy in multiple sclerosis patients. The seroprevalence of NAbs in multiple sclerosis patients treated with IFNβ during 2003–2004 was 32% in a cross-sectional analysis of routine data. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the seroprevalence of NAbs, the levels of NAb titres and the IFNβ preparations used for treatment of multiple sclerosis patients had changed in 2009–2010. Methods: This study included 1296 patients, analysed for NAbs with the myxovirus resistance protein A gene expression assay in 2009–2010. Results: The seroprevalence of NAbs had decreased to 19% in 2009–2010, which is significantly lower compared with the previous study in 2003–2004 ( p<0.0001). This decrease was attributed to the IFNβ-1a preparations only, not to IFNβ-1b. The frequency of patients with high positive titres decreased the most, from 16% to 7% ( p<0.0001). Conclusions: NAb seroprevalence has decreased since NAb monitoring became clinical practice in 2003, especially for patients with high NAb titres. This might be due to the stricter monitoring of NAb titres that prompt NAb positive patients to stop treatment, to preferential use of less immunogenic drugs and to alteration of drug formulations.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Rot, U, et al.
(författare)
-
Impression of clinical worsening fails to predict interferon-beta neutralizing antibody status
- 2008
-
Ingår i: The Journal of international medical research. - : SAGE Publications. - 0300-0605 .- 1473-2300. ; 36:6, s. 1418-1425
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against interferon-β (IFNβ) reduces clinical efficacy and markers of bioactivity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), although it has also been shown that a poor response to IFNβ coincided with unexpectedly low NAb levels. To try and resolve this incoherency, this study investigated 2822 patients referred to a NAb testing facility. The reason for NAb testing was indicated for 2506 patients: routine testing (76%), worsening of disease (14%) and other reasons (10%). Overall, 31% of patients were NAb positive and 17% had titres high enough to obliterate IFNβ bioactivity. The frequency of NAbs was similar in patients in the routine testing group compared with the worsening group. Samples showing high titres failed to be associated with worsening of symptoms. The study failed to show low NAb levels in patients responding poorly to IFNβ. It is concluded that it is not possible to predict NAb status by clinical impression of treatment response. This is likely to be an effect of the partial efficacy of IFNβ. Thus routine testing for NAbs must be carried out in order to identify NAb status in patients with MS.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Sominanda, A, et al.
(författare)
-
Interferon beta preparations for the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients differ in neutralizing antibody seroprevalence and immunogenicity
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England). - : SAGE Publications. - 1352-4585 .- 1477-0970. ; 13:2, s. 208-214
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) reduces the clinical efficacy of interferon beta (IFNβ) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate NAb seroprevalence (frequency of patients with NAbs) and immunogenicity (titer levels) of IFNβ preparations in a clinical setting. We analysed 1115 consecutive MS patients, treated with one of the three available IFNβ preparations, for an average of 40 months (1 – 120 months), for the presence of NAbs with the MxA protein induction assay. Overall, 32% of patients were positive for NAbs with neutralizing titers above 10. The frequency of NAbs, ie, the seroprevalence, was 13% in Avonex-treated patients, 43% for Betaferon, 39% for Rebif22 and 30% for Rebif44. In addition, the potential to induce high titer levels, ie, the immunogenicity, was observed to differ between preparations. Avonex, showing the lowest seroprevalence, also showed low immunogenicity and typically induced low titers. Betaferon, showing the highest seroprevalence when inducing NAbs, induced lower titers compared to Rebif22 and Rebif44. Treatment duration over five years only marginally correlated with decreased seroprevalence and titer levels. In conclusion, NAbs to IFNβ are common in a clinical setting and the IFNβ preparations differ not only in NAb seroprevalence, but also in immunogenicity. Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 208–214. http://msj.sagepub.com
|
|
