| 1. |
- Metra, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Should beta-blocker therapy be reduced or withdrawn after an episode of decompensated heart failure? Results from COMET
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Eur J Heart Fail. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842. ; 9:9, s. 901-9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether beta-blocker therapy should be reduced or withdrawn in patients who develop acute decompensated heart failure (HF). We studied the relationship between changes in beta-blocker dose and outcome in patients surviving a HF hospitalisation in COMET. METHODS: Patients hospitalised for HF were subdivided on the basis of the beta-blocker dose administered at the visit following hospitalisation, compared to that administered before. RESULTS: In COMET, 752/3029 patients (25%, 361 carvedilol and 391 metoprolol) had a non-fatal HF hospitalisation while on study treatment. Of these, 61 patients (8%) had beta-blocker treatment withdrawn, 162 (22%) had a dose reduction and 529 (70%) were maintained on the same dose. One-and two-year cumulative mortality rates were 28.7% and 44.6% for patients withdrawn from study medication, 37.4% and 51.4% for those with a reduced dosage (n.s.) and 19.1% and 32.5% for those maintained on the same dose (HR,1.59; 95%CI, 1.28-1.98; p<0.001, compared to the others). The result remained significant in a multivariable model: (HR, 1.30; 95%CI, 1.02-1.66; p=0.0318). No interaction with the beneficial effects of carvedilol, compared to metoprolol, on outcome was observed (p=0.8436). CONCLUSIONS: HF hospitalisations are associated with a high subsequent mortality. The risk of death is higher in patients who discontinue beta-blocker therapy or have their dose reduced. The increase in mortality is only partially explained by the worse prognostic profile of these patients.
|
|
| 2. |
- Olsson, Lars G., 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic importance of plasma NT-pro BNP in chronic heart failure in patients treated with a beta-blocker: results from the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) trial
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Eur J Heart Fail. - 1388-9842. ; 9:8, s. 795-801
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Plasma levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) are increased in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Beta-blockers (BB) may influence these levels but it is unclear whether changes in NT-pro BNP reflect concomitant changes in prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prognostic importance of NT-pro BNP at baseline and during follow-up, in patients in whom beta-blocker therapy is initiated. METHODS: In COMET, 3029 patients with CHF in NYHA class II-IV and EF<35% were randomised to carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate and were followed for an average of 58 months. Blood samples were collected for the measurement of NT-pro BNP at baseline (n=1559) and during follow-up (n=309). RESULTS: Baseline plasma concentrations of NT-pro BNP above the median (1242 pg/ml) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33-3.3, p<0.001). Patients who achieved NT-pro BNP levels<400 pg/ml during follow-up had a lower subsequent mortality (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15-0.69, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma concentration of NT-pro BNP is a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with CHF. Patients who achieve an NT-pro BNP of <400 pg/ml subsequent to treatment with a beta-blocker have a favourable prognosis.
|
|
| 3. |
- Remme, W. J., et al.
(författare)
-
Carvedilol protects better against vascular events than metoprolol in heart failure: results from COMET
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - 1558-3597. ; 49:9, s. 963-71
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: We explored whether vascular protection by carvedilol could contribute to its superior effects in the treatment of heart failure (HF) compared with metoprolol tartrate in the COMET (Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial) study. BACKGROUND: Full adrenergic blockade by carvedilol and additional (e.g., antioxidative) properties may lead to vascular protection relative to beta-1 blockade alone, and contribute to its efficacy in HF treatment. METHODS: Three thousand twenty-nine patients with HF due to ischemic (51%) or idiopathic cardiomyopathy (44%) were randomized double-blind to carvedilol (n = 1,511) or metoprolol (n = 1,518) and followed for 58 months. Vascular end points were cardiovascular death, stroke, stroke death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina. RESULTS: The effect of carvedilol on cardiovascular death improved consistently in subgroups with prespecified baseline variables. Myocardial infarctions were reported in 69 carvedilol and 94 metoprolol patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52 to 0.97, p = 0.03). Cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI combined were reduced by 19% in carvedilol (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.92, p = 0.0009 vs. metoprolol). Unstable angina was reported as an adverse event in 56 carvedilol and in 77 metoprolol patients (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.501 to 0.998, p = 0.049). A stroke occurred in 65 carvedilol and 80 metoprolol patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.10). Stroke or MI combined occurred in 130 carvedilol and 168 metoprolol patients (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95, p = 0.015), and fatal MI or fatal stroke occurred in 34 carvedilol and in 72 metoprolol patients (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.69, p = 0.0002). Death after a nonfatal MI or stroke occurred in 61 of 124 carvedilol and in 106 of 160 metoprolol patients (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.90, p = 0.0086). CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol improves vascular outcomes better than metoprolol. These results suggest a ubiquitous protective effect of carvedilol against major vascular events.
|
|
| 4. |
- Remme, W. J., et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of carvedilol and metoprolol on the mode of death in patients with heart failure
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Eur J Heart Fail. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 9:11, s. 1128-35
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In the COMET study, carvedilol improved survival compared to metoprolol tartrate in 3029 patients with NYHA II-IV heart failure and EF <35%, followed for an average of 58 months. AIMS: To evaluate whether the effect on overall mortality was specific for a particular mode of death. This may help to identify the mechanism of the observed difference. METHODS: Of the 1112 total deaths, 972 were adjudicated as cardiovascular, including 480 sudden, 365 circulatory failure (CF) and 51 stroke deaths. For each mode of death, the effect of pre-specified baseline variables was assessed, including sex, age, NYHA class, aetiology, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, EF, atrial fibrillation, previous myocardial infarction or hypertension, renal function, concomitant medication, and study treatment allocation. RESULTS: In multivariate Cox regression analyses, compared to metoprolol, carvedilol reduced cardiovascular (RR 0.80, CI 0.7-0.91, p=0.0009), sudden (RR 0.77, CI 0.64-0.93, p=0.0073) and stroke deaths (RR 0.37, CI 0.19-0.71, p=0.0027) with a non-significant trend for CF death (RR 0.83, CI 0.66-1.04, p=0.07). Treatment benefit with carvedilol did not differ between modes of death, except for a greater reduction in stroke death with carvedilol (competing risk analysis, p=0.0071 vs CF death). There were no interactions between treatment allocation and baseline characteristics. CONCLUSION: Mortality reduction with carvedilol compared to metoprolol appears relatively non-specific and could be consistent with a superior effect of carvedilol on cardiac function, arrhythmias or, in view of the greater reduction in stroke deaths, on vascular events.
|
|
| 5. |
- Torp-Pedersen, C., et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of metoprolol and carvedilol on preexisting and new on-set diabetes in patients with chronic heart failure {inverted exclamation}V data from the Carvedilol or metoprolol European Trial (COMET)
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Heart. - 1468-201X. ; 93:8, s. 968-973
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective Beta-blocker therapy may worsen glucose metabolism. We studied the development of new onset diabetes in a large cohort of heart failure patients treated with either metoprolol or carvedilol. Design Prospective and retrospective analysis of a controlled clinical trial. Setting Multinational multicenter study Patients 3029 patients with chronic heart failure. Interventions Randomly assigned treatment with carvedilol (n=1511, target dose 50 mg daily) or metoprolol tartrate (n=1518, target dose 100 mg daily). Results Diabetic events (diabetic coma, peripheral gangrene, diabetic foot, de-creased glucose tolerance or hyperglycemia) and new onset diabetes (clinical di-agnosis, repeated high random glucose level or glucose lowering medication) were assessed in 2298 patients without diabetes at baseline. Diabetic events oc-curred in 122/1151 (10.6%) patients in the carvedilol group and 149/1147 (13.0%) patients in the metoprolol group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78; 95% confi-dence interval (CI) 0.61-0.99, p=0.039). New onset diabetes was diagnosed in 119/1151 (10.4%) versus 145/1147 (12.6%) cases in the carvedilol and metoprolol treatment groups (HR 0.78, CI 0.61-0.998, p=0.048). Patients with diabetes at baseline had an increased mortality, compared to non-diabetics (45.3% versus, 33.9%; HR 1.45, CI 1.28-1.65). Both diabetics and non-diabetics at baseline had a similar reduction in mortality with carvedilol compared to metoprolol (RR 0.85; CI 0.69-1.06 and RR 0.82; CI, 0.71-0.94, respectively). Conclusion This study demonstrates both a high prevalence and incidence of diabetes in patients with heart failure over a course of 5 years. New onset diabe-tes was more likely to occur during treatment with metoprolol than during treat-ment with carvedilol.
|
|
| 6. |
- Torp-Pedersen, C., et al.
(författare)
-
The safety of amiodarone in patients with heart failure
- 2007
-
Ingår i: J Card Fail. - 1532-8414. ; 13:5, s. 340-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Uncertainty persists about the safety and efficacy of amiodarone for the management of heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 3029 patients with chronic heart failure to receive carvedilol or metoprolol and followed patients for a median of 58 months. One hundred fifty-five of 1466 patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II and 209 of 1563 in Class III or IV received amiodarone at baseline. Persistence with amiodarone treatment was high and 66% received amiodarone after 4 years. During follow-up, 38.7% and 58.9% of patients receiving amiodarone in NYHA Classes II and III + IV died versus 26.2% and 43.3% not receiving amiodarone (P < .001). This difference was maintained in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.7, P < .001). The difference was explained by an increased risk of death due to circulatory failure (HR 2.4, CI 1.9-3.1, P < .001) in patients receiving amiodarone. Sudden death was not different (HR 1.07, CI 0.8-1.4, P = .7). The increased risk was similar across NYHA classes with HR of 1.60 (CI 1.2-2.1, P < .001) in NYHA Class II versus 1.58 (CI 1.3-1.9, P < .001) in Classes III + IV. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with amiodarone was associated with an increased risk of death from circulatory failure independent of functional class.
|
|
