SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Sperber Ami D.) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Sperber Ami D.)

  • Resultat 1-8 av 8
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Farup, Per G, et al. (författare)
  • Irritable bowel syndrome.
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: Gastroenterology research and practice. - : Hindawi Limited. - 1687-630X .- 1687-6121. ; 2012
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
5.
  • Palsson, Olafur S., et al. (författare)
  • Worldwide population prevalence and impact of sub-diagnostic gastrointestinal symptoms
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS. - 0269-2813 .- 1365-2036. ; 59:7, s. 852-864
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BackgroundThe Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study (RFGES) found that 40.3% of adults in 26 internet-surveyed countries met Rome IV criteria for disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, additional people not meeting DGBI criteria may also be burdened by frequent gastrointestinal symptoms.AimsTo explore the prevalence and demographic distribution of sub-diagnostic gastrointestinal symptoms, and the hypothesised associated effects on quality of life (QoL), life functioning and healthcare needs.MethodsWe analysed data from the RFGES survey, which included the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire and QoL, psychological, work productivity and healthcare questions.ResultsOf the 50,033 people without a history of organic gastrointestinal disorders, 25.3% classified in the sub-diagnostic group (no DGBI but one or more frequent gastrointestinal symptoms), 41.4% had DGBI and 33.4% had no frequent gastrointestinal symptoms (non-GI group). Sub-diagnostic prevalence in different world regions ranged from 22.2% (North America) to 30.5% (Middle East), was slightly higher among males than females and decreased with age. The sub-diagnostic group was intermediate between the non-GI and DGBI groups, and significantly different from both of them on QoL, anxiety, depression, somatisation, healthcare utilisation and life and work impairment.ConclusionsOne in four adults without organic gastrointestinal disorders or DGBI report frequent gastrointestinal symptoms. This sub-diagnostic group has reduced QoL, greater psychological and non-GI bodily symptoms, impaired work productivity and life activities and greater healthcare use compared to non-GI individuals. This suggests that many in this sub-diagnostic group might benefit from healthcare services or symptom self-management advice. This survey in 26 countries found that 25.3% of adults who do not have organic gastrointestinal disorders or Rome IV disorders of gut-brain interaction have one or more frequent gastrointestinal symptoms. This sub-diagnostic group collectively exhibits reduced quality of life and work productivity, elevated psychological symptoms and increased healthcare needs.
  •  
6.
  • Sperber, Ami D., et al. (författare)
  • The aging gastrointestinal tract: Epidemiology and clinical significance of disorders of gut-brain interaction in the older general population
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS. - 0269-2813 .- 1365-2036. ; 60:4, s. 446-456
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: Most previous reports on the prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) show higher rates in younger individuals. Exceptions are faecal incontinence and functional constipation. Aim: To compare prevalence rates for 22 DGBI and 24 primary symptoms, by age, using the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology (RFGES) study dataset. Methods: The RFGES dataset enables diagnosis of 22 DGBI among 54,127 participants (>= 18 years) in 26 countries. Older age was defined as >= 65 years. We assessed differences between age groups by sex, geographic region, somatisation, abnormal anxiety and depression scores, quality of life (QoL), individual gastrointestinal symptoms and disease severity for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Results: Rates for any DGBI were 41.9% and 31.9% in the <65 and >= 65 age groups, respectively. For all Rome IV diagnoses except faecal incontinence, rates were higher in the younger group. The older group had lower scores for any DGBI by geographic region, non-gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, abnormal anxiety and depression scores, and IBS severity, and better scores for QoL. The mean number of endorsed symptoms and their frequency were higher in the younger group. Conclusion: sIn this large general population study, the prevalence and impact of DGBI, apart from faecal incontinence, were higher in the younger group. Despite this, DGBI rates are still high in absolute terms in the >= 65 age group and necessitate clinical awareness and, perhaps, an age-specific treatment approach.
  •  
7.
  • Trindade, Inês A., 1990-, et al. (författare)
  • Global Prevalence of Psychological Distress and Comorbidity With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interactions
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: American Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Blackwell Publishing. - 0002-9270 .- 1572-0241. ; 119:1, s. 165-175
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • INTRODUCTION: This study focused on defining the global prevalence of clinically relevant levels of psychological distress and somatic symptoms and the prevalence of coexistence between these symptoms and disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). We also analyzed how clinically relevant psychological distress and somatic symptoms and coexistent DGBI are associated with health-related outcomes.METHODS: We included a representative sample of 54,127 adult participants (49.1% women; mean age of 44.3 years) from 26 countries worldwide. Participants completed an Internet survey (the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study) with validated self-report questionnaires.RESULTS: Clinically relevant psychological distress and/or somatic symptom severity was reported by 37.5% of the sample. These participants had 4.45 times higher odds to have at least one DGBI than individuals without psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms. Compared with participants with psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms with vs without DGBI, participants with a DGBI reported increased healthcare and medication utilization (with OR from 1.6 to 2.8). Coexistent DGBI in participants with psychological distress and/or somatic symptoms was the variable most strongly associated with reduced mental (β = −0.77; confidence interval [−0.86 to −0.68]) and physical (β = −1.17; confidence interval [−1.24 to −1.10]) quality of life.DISCUSSION: This global study shows that psychological distress, somatic symptoms, and DGBI are very common and frequently overlap. The coexistence between psychological distress/somatic symptoms and DGBI seems to be especially detrimental to quality of life and healthcare utilization. Individuals with psychological distress/somatic symptoms and DGBI coexistence seem to be a group vulnerable to psychosocial problems that should be studied further and would likely benefit from psychological/psychiatric interventions.
  •  
8.
  • van Gils, Tom, et al. (författare)
  • Symptom profiles compatible with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) in organic gastrointestinal diseases: A global population-based study
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL. - 2050-6406 .- 2050-6414.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BackgroundPatients with organic gastrointestinal (GI) diseases and diabetes mellitus (DM) can have concomitant disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI).ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare the global prevalence of DGBI-compatible symptom profiles in adults with and without self-reported organic GI diseases or DM.MethodsData were collected in a population-based internet survey in 26 countries, the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology Study (n = 54,127). Individuals were asked if they had been diagnosed by a doctor with gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer, coeliac disease, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), diverticulitis, GI cancer or DM. Individuals not reporting the organic diagnosis of interest were included in the reference group. DGBI-compatible symptom profiles were based on Rome IV diagnostic questions. Odds ratios (ORs [95% confidence interval]) were calculated using mixed logistic regression models.ResultsHaving one of the investigated organic GI diseases was linked to having any DGBI-compatible symptom profile ranging from OR 1.64 [1.33, 2.02] in GI cancer to OR 3.22 [2.80, 3.69] in IBD. Those associations were stronger than for DM, OR 1.26 [1.18, 1.35]. Strong links between organic GI diseases and DGBI-compatible symptom profiles were seen for corresponding (e.g., IBD and bowel DGBI) and non-corresponding (e.g., IBD and esophageal DGBI) anatomical regions. The strongest link was seen between fecal incontinence and coeliac disease, OR 6.94 [4.95, 9.73]. After adjusting for confounding factors, associations diminished, but persisted.ConclusionDGBI-compatible symptom profiles are more common in individuals with self-reported organic GI diseases and DM compared to the general population. The presence of these concomitant DGBIs should be considered in the management of organic (GI) diseases. image
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-8 av 8

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy