| 1. |
- Morén, Staffan, et al.
(författare)
-
Speech in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate : Long-Term Follow-Up After One- or Two-Stage Palate Repair
- 2017
-
Ingår i: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. - : SAGE Publications. - 1055-6656 .- 1545-1569. ; 54:6, s. 639-649
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech in adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate with one-stage or two-stage palate closure and compare the speech of the patients with that of a noncleft control group.DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with long-term follow-up.PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: All unilateral cleft lip and palate patients born from 1960 to 1987 and treated at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, were invited (n = 109). Participation rate was 67% (n = 73) at a mean of 35 years after primary surgery. Forty-seven had been treated according to one-stage palate closure and 26 according to two-stage palate closure. Pharyngeal flap surgery had been performed in 11 of the 73 patients (15%). The noncleft control group consisted of 63 age-matched volunteers.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Speech-language pathologists rated perceptual speech characteristics from blinded audio recordings.RESULTS: Among patients, seven (10%) presented with hypernasality, 12 (16%) had audible nasal emission and/or nasal turbulence, five (7%) had consonant production errors, one (2%) had glottal reinforcements/substitutions, and one (2%) had reduced intelligibility. Controls had no audible signs of velopharyngeal insufficiency and no quantifiable problems with the other speech production variables. No significant differences were identified between patients treated with one-stage and two-stage palate closure for any of the variables.CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of speech outcome indicative of velopharyngeal insufficiency among adult patients treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate was low but higher compared with individuals without cleft. Whether palatal closure is performed in one or two stages does not seem to affect the speech outcome at a mean age of 35 years.
|
|
| 2. |
- Morén, Staffan, et al.
(författare)
-
Speech in Adults Treated for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate as Rated by Naïve Listeners, Speech-Language Pathologists and Patients
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 1748-6815 .- 1878-0539. ; 75:10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Speech may be affected in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). Professional listeners, naïve listeners, and patients may perceive speech differently. The aim of the study was to assess speech among adults treated for unilateral CLP (UCLP) as rated by naïve listeners, speech-language pathologists (SLPs), and self-assessment and to evaluate how well these ratings correlate.All patients with complete UCLP treated at the Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, in 1960–1987 were invited. A total of 73 of 109 patients (67%) participated, with a mean of 35 years since the initiation of treatment. The noncleft control group consisted of 55 volunteers. All participants answered questionnaires for self-rating of speech, and their speech was audio-recorded digitally. Fourteen naïve listeners and four SLPs rated the speech individually from blinded recordings.There were more speech abnormalities among patients compared to controls according to the ratings of naïve listeners and SLPs. In controls and patients, there were positive correlations between the speech ratings by naïve listeners and SLPs r = 0.44 to 0.71, p < 0.001, Spearman). The patients were less satisfied and rated to have more speech abnormalities than controls (p < 0.001).Although adults treated for UCLP considered their speech as fairly good, they were less satisfied than noncleft controls. The agreement between ratings by naïve listeners and SLPs were good, while the agreement between these ratings and self-assessment varied widely. When assessing speech in adults treated for UCLP, differences in perception of speech abnormalities by professionals, laymen, and patients should be considered.
|
|
