| 1. |
- Andersson, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of response in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with intratumoral dendritic cell vaccination using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MRI and histogram analysis
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Acta Radiologica. - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 64:1, s. 32-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an emerging method with promising results. Immunotherapy can have an antitumor effect without affecting tumor size, calling for functional imaging methods for response evaluation. Purpose To evaluate the response to intratumoral injections with the immune primer ilixadencel in HCCs with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and histogram analysis. Material and Methods A total of 17 patients with advanced HCC were treated with intratumoral injections with ilixadencel on three occasions 2-5 weeks apart. The patients were examined with IVIM before each injection as well as approximately three months after the first injection. Results The 10th percentile of perfusion-related parameter D* decreased significantly after the first and second intratumoral injections of ilixadencel compared to baseline (P < 0.05). There was a non-significant trend of lower median region of interest f (perfusion fraction) before injection 2 compared to baseline (P = 0.07). There were significant correlations between the 10th percentile and median of D at baseline and change in tumor size after three months (r = 0.79, P < 0.01 and r = 0.72, P < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion DW-MRI with IVIM and histogram analysis revealed significant reductions of D* early after treatment as well as an association between D at baseline and smaller tumor growth at three months. The lower percentiles (10th and 50th) were found more important. Further research is needed to confirm our preliminary findings of reduced perfusion after ilixadencel vaccinations, suggesting a treatment effect on HCC.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ben-Shabat, Ilan, et al.
(författare)
-
Isolated hepatic perfusion as a treatment for liver metastases of uveal melanoma.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE. - : MyJove Corporation. - 1940-087X. ; :95
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is a procedure where the liver is surgically isolated and perfused with a high concentration of the chemotherapeutic agent melphalan. Briefly, the procedure starts with the setup of a percutaneous veno-venous bypass from the femoral vein to the external jugular vein. Via a laparotomy, catheters are then inserted into the proper hepatic artery and the caval vein. The portal vein and the caval vein, both supra- and infrahepatically, are then clamped. The arterial and venous catheters are connected to a heart lung machine and the liver is perfused with melphalan (1 mg/kg body weight) for 60 min. This way it is possible to locally perfuse the liver with a high dose of a chemotherapeutic agent, without leakage to the systemic circulation. In previous studies including patients with isolated liver metastases of uveal melanoma, an overall response rate of 33-100% and a median survival between 9 and 13 months, have been reported. The aim of this protocol is to give a clear description of how to perform the procedure and to discuss IHP as a treatment option for liver metastases of uveal melanoma.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Olofsson Bagge, Roger, 1978, et al.
(författare)
-
Isolated Hepatic Perfusion With Melphalan for Patients With Isolated Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial (the SCANDIUM Trial)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 41:16, s. 3042-50
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSEAbout half of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma present with isolated liver metastasis, in whom the median survival is 6-12 months. The few systemic treatment options available only moderately prolong survival. Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with melphalan is a regional treatment option, but prospective efficacy and safety data are lacking.METHODSIn this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial, patients with previously untreated isolated liver metastases from uveal melanoma were randomly assigned to receive a one-time treatment with IHP with melphalan or best alternative care (control group). The primary end point was overall survival at 24 months. Here, we report the secondary outcomes of response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety.RESULTSNinety-three patients were randomly assigned, and 87 patients were assigned to either IHP (n = 43) or a control group receiving the investigator's choice of treatment (n = 44). In the control group, 49% received chemotherapy, 39% immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 9% locoregional treatment other than IHP. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rates (ORRs) were 40% versus 4.5% in the IHP and control groups, respectively (P < .0001). The median PFS was 7.4 months versus 3.3 months (P < .0001), with a hazard ratio of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.36), and the median hPFS was 9.1 months versus 3.3 months (P < .0001), both favoring the IHP arm. There were 11 treatment-related serious adverse events in the IHP group compared with seven in the control group. There was one treatment-related death in the IHP group.CONCLUSIONIHP treatment resulted in superior ORR, hPFS, and PFS compared with best alternative care in previously untreated patients with isolated liver metastases from primary uveal melanoma.
|
|
| 5. |
- Sternby Eilard, Malin, 1974, et al.
(författare)
-
A prospective clinical trial on sorafenib treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation
- 2019
-
Ingår i: BMC Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2407. ; 19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundPatients with hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation are commonly treated with locoregional treatments, such as TACE and ablation, to prevent tumor progression and dropout and to improve long-term outcome after transplantation. We wanted to prospectively assess feasibility of systemic antitumor treatment with sorafenib as neoadjuvant treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma while waiting for liver transplantation, evaluating tolerability, toxicity and posttransplant morbidity. We also wanted to evaluate perfusion CT parameters to assess tumor properties and response early after start of sorafenib treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsTwelve patients assigned for liver transplantation due to hepatocellular carcinoma, within the UCSF and who fulfilled other criteria, were included January 2012-August 2014. After baseline evaluation, sorafenib treatment was started. Treatment was evaluated by perfusion CT at 1, 4 and 12weeks and thereafter every 8weeks. Toxicity and quality of life was assessed at 1 and 4weeks and every 4weeks thereafter during treatment. Treatment was stopped when patients were prioritized on the transplantation waiting list or when intolerable side effects or tumor progress warranted other treatments. Posttransplant morbidity after 90days was registered according to Clavien-Dindo.ResultsBaseline perfusion CT parameters in the tumors predicted the outcome according to RECIST/mRECIST at three months, but no change in CTp parameters was detected as a result of sorafenib. Sorafenib as neoadjuvant treatment was associated with intolerability and dose reductions. Therefore the prerequisites for evaluation of the sorafenib effect on both CT parameters and tumor response were impaired.ConclusionsThis study failed to show changes in CTp parameters during sorafenib treatment. Despite the curative treatment intention, tolerability of neoadjuvant sorafenib treatment before liver transplantation was inadequate in this study.Trial registrationEudraCT number: 2010-024306-36 (date 2011-04-07).
|
|
| 6. |
- Sternby Eilard, Malin, 1974, et al.
(författare)
-
Addition of alfa fetoprotein to traditional criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma improves selection accuracy in liver transplantation
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0036-5521 .- 1502-7708. ; 53:8, s. 976-983
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Liver transplantation in hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is curative only for a selection of patients. Commonly used criteria are mostly based on tumor size and number. However, patients within criteria do have tumor recurrences after transplantation and patients outside criteria are excluded even though some could benefit from transplantation. The tumor marker alpha fetoprotein (AFP) is associated with poor outcome and has already been reported to improve selection. We investigated the hypothesis that AFP level combined with traditional selection criteria could ameliorate the selection accuracy for liver transplantation in HCC.Materials and methods: A retrospective national cohort study in 336 patients who had liver transplantation for HCC in Sweden 1996-2014.Results: AFP cut-off levels of 20, 100, 1000 and >1000ng/mL stratified both survival and tumor recurrence, with estimated 5-year survival rates of 74, 61, 49 and 31%, respectively. A simple score, combining three risk levels according to Milan and UCSF fulfillment with three levels of AFP, increased predictive accuracy. A high score identified 35 at-risk patients with estimated post-transplant 5-year survival rate of only 29% compared to 50% for 76 patients excluded by UCSF. More patients were within the combined score cut-off compared to within UCSF, but 5-year survival was similar, 67% versus 66%.Conclusion: AFP combined with traditional selection criteria ameliorates the selection accuracy for liver transplantation in HCC.
|
|
| 7. |
- Sternby Eilard, Malin, 1974
(författare)
-
Prognostic factors and tumor treatments in hepatocellular cancer
- 2019
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Prognosis is related to tumor burden, liver function, and performance status as well as treatment factors. Accurate prognostication is a requisite for optimal treatment decisions. Aims: The general aim was to explore specific prognostic factors in different settings of HCC, and to evaluate outcome after treatment with curative intent in patients eligible for multiple treatments. Methods: This thesis is based on four clinical studies in patients with HCC. Study I is a prospective observational study, investigating if patient-reported quality of life (QoL) can predict survival and increase the prognostic accuracy of established staging models. Study II is a review of medical records in a national cohort of patients with liver transplantation from 1996-2014, investigating if AFP levels increase the prognostic accuracy of current selection criteria. Study III is a prospective feasibility study, evaluating neo-adjuvant systemic treatment with sorafenib before liver transplantation. In the fourth study, data from a national registry 2008-2016, was used to assess risk factors and compare outcome in patients eligible for multiple treatments. Overall and recurrence-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and comparisons using log rank tests. Risk factor assessment was performed using Cox Regression analyses. Results and Conclusions: QoL data was prognostic for survival. Adding QoL data improved the prognostic accuracy of established scoring systems. Pre-transplant AFP was a prognostic factor for survival after liver transplantation for HCC. AFP combined with traditional criteria improved the accuracy of patient selection. Sorafenib treatment before liver transplantation was associated with low tolerability and inadequate tumor control. Survival differences after liver transplantation, resection, or ablation were limited in subgroups with well-preserved liver function and limited tumor burden. Liver function variables predicted survival and should be carefully considered in treatment decisions.
|
|
| 8. |
- Sternby Eilard, Malin, 1974, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality of life as a prognostic factor for survival in hepatocellular carcinoma
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Liver International. - : Wiley. - 1478-3223. ; 38:5, s. 885-894
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background & Aims: Prognostication in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is demanding. Not only tumour extent and performance status are to be considered, but also liver function, which is often limiting for both survival itself and for treatment possibilities. This study was conducted to assess whether patient-reported questionnaires containing general and liver-specific questions could improve prognostication of survival. Methods: 185 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Norway and Sweden were prospectively included. Patients completed the quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ C30 and HCC18, and clinical, radiological and laboratory parameters were registered. Multivariate Cox regression and Harrell's C-statistics were used to identify the model that best predicted mortality. Results: Quality-of-life data were prognostic for overall survival. Fatigue and nutrition scales were prognostic in the multivariable analyses alone and in combination with clinical parameters. The prognostic value of established scoring systems was increased by the addition of QoL data. The best prognostic power was achieved by combining HCC18 nutrition scale with selected background parameters. Conclusion: Quality-of-life questionnaires can prognosticate mortality in HCC patients. When combined with established scoring systems, both the general cancer questionnaire EORTC QLQ C30, and the additional liver cancer-specific HCC18 increased the prognostic accuracy slightly.
|
|
| 9. |
- Sternby Eilard, Malin, 1974, et al.
(författare)
-
Survival and prognostic factors after transplantation, resection and ablation in a national cohort of early hepatocellular carcinoma
- 2021
-
Ingår i: HPB. - : Elsevier BV. - 1365-182X .- 1477-2574. ; 23:3, s. 394-403
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Background: In patients with early hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and preserved liver function, the choice between transplantation, resection and ablation and which factors to consider is not obvious and guidelines differ. In this national cohort study, we aimed to compare posttreatment survival in patients fulfilling predefined criteria, and to analyse preoperative risk factors that could influence decision. Methods: We used data from HCC-patients registered with primary transplantation, resection or ablation 2008–2016 in the SweLiv-registry. In Child A-subgroups, 18–75 years, we compared survival after transplantation or resection, with different tumour criteria; either corresponding to our transplantation criteria (N = 257) or stricter with single tumours ≤50 mm (N = 159). A subgroup with single tumours ≤30 mm, compared all three treatments (N = 193). Results: We included 1022 HCC-patients; transplantation n = 223, resection n = 438, ablation n = 361. In the transplant criteria subgroup, differences in five-year survival, adjusted for age and gender, were not significant, with 71.2% (CI 62.3–81.3) after transplantation (n = 109) and 63.5% (CI 54.9–73.5) after resection (n = 148). Good liver function (Child 5 vs. 6, Albumin ≥36), increased the risk after transplantation, but decreased the risk after resection and ablation. Conclusion: Even within Child A, detailed liver function assessment is important before treatment decision, and for stratifying survival comparisons.
|
|
| 10. |
- Takala, S., et al.
(författare)
-
Practice patterns in diagnostics, staging, and management strategies of gallbladder cancer among Nordic tertiary centers
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. - : Sage Publications. - 1457-4969 .- 1799-7267. ; 112:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and objective: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy in the Nordic countries and no common Nordic treatment guidelines exist. This study aimed to characterize the current diagnostic and treatment strategies in the Nordic countries and disclose differences in these strategies. Methods: This was a survey study with a cross-sectional questionnaire of all 19 university hospitals providing curative-intent surgery for GBC in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. Results: In all Nordic countries except Sweden, neoadjuvant/downstaging chemotherapy was used in GBC patients. In T1b and T2, majority of the centers (15-18/19) performed extended cholecystectomy. In T3, majority of the centers (13/19) performed cholecystectomy with resection of segments 4b and 5. In T4, majority of the centers (12-14/19) chose palliative/oncological care. The centers in Sweden extended lymphadenectomy beyond the hepatoduodenal ligament, whereas all other Nordic centers usually limited lymphadenectomy to the hepatoduodenal ligament. All Nordic centers except those in Norway used adjuvant chemotherapy routinely for GBC. There were no major differences between the Nordic centers in diagnostics and follow-up. Conclusions: The surgical and oncological treatment strategies of GBC vary considerably between the Nordic centers and countries.
|
|
