| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Löhle, Matthias, et al.
(författare)
-
Application of single wrist-wearable accelerometry for objective motor diary assessment in fluctuating Parkinson's disease
- 2023
-
Ingår i: npj Digital Medicine. - 2398-6352. ; 6:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by motor fluctuations including unpredictable oscillations remarkably impairing quality of life. Effective management and development of novel therapies for these response fluctuations largely depend on clinical rating instruments such as the widely-used PD home diary, which are associated with biases and errors. Recent advancements in digital health technologies provide user-friendly wearables that can be tailored for continuous monitoring of motor fluctuations. Their criterion validity under real-world conditions using clinical examination as the gold standard remains to be determined. We prospectively examined this validity of a wearable accelerometer-based digital Parkinson's Motor Diary (adPMD) using the Parkinson's Kinetigraph (PKG ®) in an alternative application by converting its continuous data into one of the three motor categories of the PD home diary (Off, On and Dyskinetic state). Sixty-three out of 91 eligible participants with fluctuating PD (46% men, average age 66) had predefined sufficient adPMD datasets (>70% of half-hour periods) from 2 consecutive days. 92% of per-protocol assessments were completed. adPMD monitoring of daily times in motor states showed moderate validity for Off and Dyskinetic state (ICC = 0.43-0.51), while inter-rating methods agreements on half-hour-level can be characterized as poor (median Cohen's κ = 0.13-0.21). Individualization of adPMD thresholds for transferring accelerometer data into diary categories improved temporal agreements up to moderate level for Dyskinetic state detection (median Cohen's κ = 0.25-0.41). Here we report that adPMD real-world-monitoring captures daily times in Off and Dyskinetic state in advanced PD with moderate validities, while temporal agreement of adPMD and clinical observer diary data is limited.
|
|
| 3. |
- Löhle, Matthias, et al.
(författare)
-
Validation of the PD home diary for assessment of motor fluctuations in advanced Parkinson's disease
- 2022
-
Ingår i: npj Parkinson's Disease. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2373-8057. ; 8:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary is frequently used in clinical trials to measure efficacy of medical treatments for motor fluctuations in advanced PD. This prospective study in fluctuating PD patients examines the validity of the diary for quantification of motor states in comparison to direct clinical observation. 51 patients (median age: 65 years, disease duration: 11 years) completed the diary half-hourly for two consecutive days and were simultaneously rated by an experienced observer, who independently evaluated motor states half-hourly throughout daytime. Overall agreement (Cohen's kappa) between patient and observer diary entries was 59.8% (0.387). Patients documented more On without dyskinesia (52.3% vs. 38.9%, P < 0.001) and less On with dyskinesia (21.5% vs. 34.2%, P < 0.001), whereas proportions for Off intervals were not different between patient and observer diaries (26.2% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.97). Temporal agreement between diary ratings was unsatisfactory, particularly for On with dyskinesia. Taken together, our study suggests that the PD home diary only inadequately reflects actual motor states compared to direct clinical observation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Timpka, Jonathan, et al.
(författare)
-
Objective Observer vs. Patient Motor State Assessments Using the PD Home Diary in Advanced Parkinsons Disease
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in Neurology. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 1664-2295. ; 13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The Parkinson Disease (PD) Home Diary (HD) is a commonly used clinical outcome measure, but it has not been extensively compared to direct assessments by experienced observers. Objective: Validation of patient-reported HD by investigating the agreement between motor state assessments by patients and observers. Methods: This observational study included patients with PD and motor fluctuations. Observers were physicians or research nurses. Patients completed a screening visit, one day of diary ratings at home, and then two days of ratings on-site during which patients and observers simultaneously judged the participants motor state. Results: Observers and 40 patients completed 1,288 pairs of half-hourly blinded motor state assessments. There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings (P < 0.001) and the temporal agreement was poor (Cohens kappa = 0.358). The agreement between patient and observer ratings was 71.1% for observed "On without dyskinesia", 57.3% for observed "Off", and 49.4% for observed "On with dyskinesia". Daily times spent in the three motor states as aggregated diary data showed fair to excellent reliability with intraclass coefficient values ranging from 0.45 to 0.52 for "On" and 0.77 for "Off". Conclusion: There were significant differences between observer and patient ratings. Patients and observers generally agreed on when the patients was in the "On" state (with or without dyskinesia). Patient ratings on the hour level seem to be influenced by other aspects of the patients experience than the observed motor state, but assessment of daily time spent in the different motor state provides reasonable reliability.
|
|
| 5. |
- Chaudhuri, K. Ray, et al.
(författare)
-
Opicapone versus placebo in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuation-associated pain : rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind OCEAN (OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN) trial
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BMC Neurology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2377. ; 22:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Optimisation of dopaminergic therapy may alleviate fluctuation-related pain in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Opicapone (OPC) is a third-generation, once-daily catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor shown to be generally well tolerated and efficacious in reducing OFF-time in two pivotal trials in patients with PD and end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN (OCEAN) trial aims to investigate the efficacy of OPC 50 mg in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations and associated pain, when administered as adjunctive therapy to existing treatment with levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCi). Methods: OCEAN is a Phase IV, international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, interventional trial in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations and associated pain. It consists of a 1-week screening period, 24-week double-blind treatment period and 2-week follow-up period. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 to OPC 50 mg or placebo once daily while continuing current treatment with levodopa/DDCi and other chronic, stable anti-PD and/or analgesic treatments. The primary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Domain 3 (fluctuation-related pain) of the King’s Parkinson’s disease Pain Scale (KPPS). The key secondary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Domain B (anxiety) of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Non-Motor rating Scale (MDS-NMS). Additional secondary efficacy assessments include other domains and total scores of the KPPS and MDS-NMS, the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8), the MDS-sponsored Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts III and IV, Clinical and Patient’s Global Impressions of Change, and change in functional status via Hauser’s diary. Safety assessments include the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. The study will be conducted in approximately 140 patients from 50 clinical sites in Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. Recruitment started in February 2021 and the last patient is expected to complete the study by late 2022. Discussion: The OCEAN trial will help determine whether the use of adjunctive OPC 50 mg treatment can improve fluctuation-associated pain in PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The robust design of OCEAN will address the current lack of reliable evidence for dopaminergic-based therapy in the treatment of PD-associated pain. Trial registration: EudraCT number 2020–001175-32; registered on 2020-08-07.
|
|
| 6. |
- Fauser, Mareike, et al.
(författare)
-
Intraindividual Variability of Nonmotor Fluctuations in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Parkinson's Disease. - 1877-718X. ; 5:4, s. 737-741
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Nonmotor symptoms (NMS) fluctuate in conjunction with motor oscillations in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), though little is known about the variability of NMS fluctuations in individual patients. We aimed to assess within-patient variability in frequency and severity of NMS during a series of five patient-perceived motor On and Off periods in 38 fluctuating PD patients from the multicenter NonMotorFluctuations in PD study using a visual analogue scale. NMS frequency and severity appeared moderately variable in both motor states within individual patients. Symptom severity ranges between motor states showed high variability and were larger in motor Off states for most NMS.
|
|
| 7. |
- Janz, Carin, et al.
(författare)
-
Non-Motor Symptom Management : Insights into Adherence to Treatment Guidelines in Parkinson’s Disease Patients
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Parkinson's Disease. - 1877-718X. ; 14:2, s. 297-312
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background:Non-motor symptoms (NMS) reduce quality of life in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, who experience three times more NMS than individuals without PD. While there are international and national NMS treatment guidelines, their implication in clinical practice remains unclear.Objective:This study aimed to investigate the adherence to pharmacological NMS treatment guidelines in patients with mild to moderately severe PD.Methods:220 PD patients with ≥1 NMS based on the Non-Motor Symptom Questionnaire and a Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤4 were randomly selected from the Swedish Parkinson registry and screened for inclusion. NMS were evaluated using the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society–Non-Motor Rating Scale (MDS-NMS), Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale 2, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Treatment was compared with Swedish national guidelines and international guidelines from the MDS Evidence-Based Medicine Committee.Results:Among 165 included patients, the median number of NMS was 14, and in median 7 symptoms were estimated to require treatment. The most common NMS requiring treatment were pain (69%) and urinary problems (56%). Treatment of depression and constipation demonstrated the highest adherence to guidelines (79% and 77%), while dysphagia and excessive daytime sleepiness exhibited the lowest adherence (0% and 4%). On average, only 32% of NMS were treated in accordance with guidelines.Conclusions:Adherence to pharmacological guidelines for NMS in patients with mild to severe PD was low. This study highlights the need for improved evaluation and treatment of NMS to enhance symptom management and quality of life among PD patients.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Martinez-Martin, Pablo, et al.
(författare)
-
EuroInf: A Multicenter Comparative Observational Study of Apomorphine and Levodopa Infusion in Parkinson's Disease
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Movement Disorders. - : Wiley. - 0885-3185. ; 30:4, s. 510-516
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (Apo) and intrajejunal levodopa infusion (IJLI) are two treatment options for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) and refractory motor complications, with varying cost of treatment. There are no multicenter studies comparing the effects of the two strategies. This open-label, prospective, observational, 6-month, multicenter study compared 43 patients on Apo (48.8% males, age 62.3 +/- 10.6 years; disease duration: 14 +/- 4.4 years; median H & Y stage 3; interquartile range [IQR]: 3-4) and 44 on IJLI (56.8% males, age 62.7 +/- 9.1 years; disease duration: 16.1 +/- 6.7 years; median H & Y stage 4; IQR, 3-4). Cohen's effect sizes (0.8 considered as large) were large with both therapies with respect to total motor, nonmotor, and quality-of-life scores. The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) with Apo showed moderate improvement, whereas sleep/fatigue, gastrointestinal, urinary, and sexual dimensions of the NMSS showed significantly higher improvement with IJLI. Seventy-five percent on IJLI improved in their quality-of-life and nonmotor symptoms (NMS), whereas in the Apo group, a similar proportion improved in quality of life, but 40% in NMS. Adverse effects included peritonitis with IJLI and skin nodules on Apo. Based on this open-label, nonrandomized, comparative study, we report that, in advanced Parkinson's patients, both IJLI and Apo infusion therapy appear to provide a robust improvement in motor symptoms, motor complications, quality-of-life, and some NMS. Controlled, randomized studies are required. (c) 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
|
|
