SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Stranne J.) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Stranne J.)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 20
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Andreasson, A., et al. (författare)
  • Fosfomycin versus Ciprofloxacin as transrectal prostatebiopsy antibiotic prophylaxis an open randomized controlled multicenter drug trial
  • 2023
  • Ingår i: European Urology. - : Elsevier. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560. ; 83:Suppl. 1, s. S180-S180
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Introduction & Objectives: Antibiotic prophylaxis are administered as a routine to decrease the risk for septic complications following transrectal prostate biopsy. Fosfomycin administered 1 h or more prior to biopsy has equal or better infectious complication rates as compared to Ciprofloxacin in both prospective and retrospective studies from countries with high rates of antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate if Fosfomycin administered immediately prior to prostate biopsy was as effective as Ciprofloxacin in Sweden, a country with low rates of antibiotic resistance.Materials & Methods: A randomized, controlled, open, multicenter, non-inferiority-study including men of all ages undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy was performed in the urology departments of three Swedish hospitals. The total number of patients were planned for 3448, divided into low and high infection risk groups. The low-risk group was randomized to either one dose of Fosfomycin 3g or Ciprofloxacin 750mg before biopsy. The high-risk group was randomized to either two doses of Fosfomycin 3g prior to biopsy and one more 24 h after biopsy or Ciprofloxacin 500mg once prior to biopsy and then twice daily for three days. The drugs were administered orally. All patients had a rectal swab for culture before and after biopsy. The endpoint was hospitalisation due to urinary tract infection within 14 days from biopsy, follow-up was performed with a phone interview.Results: The safety board prematurely interrupted the study after 42 included patients due to an unusual high number of hospitalisations. Four out of 20 patients (20%), three in the low-risk group and one in the high-risk group, had been hospitalised due to urosepsis in the Fosfomycin group. One further patient described fever symptoms but did not seek health care. No patient in the Ciprofloxacin group (n=21) described symptoms of infection from the urinary tract. One patient was lost to follow-up. A one-sided binomial test showed a p-value of <0.001. Two of the four hospitalised patients had a positive blood culture for Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and one had a positive rectal swab culture for Pseudomonas species both before and after biopsy.Conclusions: The study does not support the use of Fosfomycin administered immediately prior to prostate biopsy. The results may have been affected by the unexpected high number of Pseudomonas infections, a bacteria where Fosfomycin often lack effect. If Fosfomycin is to be used it should be with caution if Pseudomonas has been seen in earlier cultures
  •  
2.
  • Cornford, Philip, et al. (författare)
  • EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
  • 2024
  • Ingår i: European urology. - 1873-7560.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa.The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence.A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment.The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management.This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Aus, G, et al. (författare)
  • Individualized screening interval for prostate cancer based on prostate-specific antigen level - Results of a prospective, randomized, population-based study
  • 2005
  • Ingår i: Archives of Internal Medicine. - 0003-9926. ; 165:16, s. 1857-1861
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the future cumulative risk of prostate cancer in relation to levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in blood and to determine whether this information could be used to individualize the PSA testing interval. Methods: The study included 5855 of 9972 men (aged 50-66 years) who accepted an invitation to participate in a prospective, randomized study of early detection for prostate cancer. We used a protocol based on biennial PSA measurements starting from 1995 and 1996. Men with serum PSA levels of 3.0 ng/mL or more were offered prostate biopsies. Results: Among the 5855 men, 539 cases of prostate cancer (9.2%) were detected after a median follow-up of 7.6 years (up to July 1, 2003). Cancer detection rates during the follow-up period in relation to PSA levels were as follows: 0 to 0.49 ng/mL, 0% (0/958); 0.50 to 0.99 ng/ mL, 0.9% (17/1992); 1.00 to 1.49 ng/mL, 4.7% (54/ 1138); 1.50 to 1.99 ng/mL, 12.3% (70/571); 2.00 to 2.49 ng/mL, 21.4% (67/313); 2.50 to 2.99 ng/mL, 25.2% (56/222); 3.00 to 3.99 ng/mL, 33.3% (89/267); 4.00 to 6.99 ng/mL, 38.9% (103/265); 7.00 to 9.99 ng/mL, 50.0% (30/60); and for men with an initial PSA of 10.00 ng/mL or higher, 76.8% (53/69). Not a single case of prostate cancer was detected within 3 years in 2950 men (50.4% of the screened population) with an initial PSA level less than 1 ng/mL. Conclusions: Retesting intervals should be individualized on the basis of the PSA level, and the large group of men with PSA levels of less than 1 ng/mL can safely be scheduled for a 3-year testing interval.
  •  
5.
  • Gillespie, B. M., et al. (författare)
  • The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Team Performance: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Human Factors. - : SAGE Publications. - 0018-7208. ; 63:8, s. 1352-1379
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Objective The aim of this study is to describe the impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance in the operating room. Background The introduction of surgical robots has improved the technical performance of surgical procedures but has also contributed to unexpected interactions in surgical teams, leading to new types of errors. Method A systematic literature search of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases using key words and MeSH terms was conducted. Screening identified studies employing qualitative and quantitative methods published between January 2000 and September 2019. Two reviewers independently appraised the methodological quality of the articles using theMixed Methods Appraisal Tool(2018). Discussions were held among authors to examine quality scores of the studies and emergent themes, and agreement was reached through consensus. Themes were derived using inductive content analysis. Results Combined searches identified 1,065 citations. Of these, 19 articles, 16 quantitative and 3 qualitative, were included. Robotic-assisted surgeries included urology, gynecology, cardiac, and general procedures involving surgeons, anesthetists, nurses, and technicians. Three themes emerged: Negotiating the altered physical environs and adapting team communications to manage task and technology; managing the robotic system to optimize workflow efficiency; andtechnical proficiency depends on experience, team familiarity, and case complexity. Conclusion Inclusion of a robot as a team member adds further complexity to the work of surgery. Application These review findings will inform training programs specifically designed to optimize teamwork, workflow efficiency, and learning needs.
  •  
6.
  • Löwemark, Ludvig, et al. (författare)
  • Practical guidelines and recent advances in the Itrax XRF core-scanning procedure
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Quaternary International. - : Elsevier BV. - 1040-6182 .- 1873-4553. ; 514, s. 16-29
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • XRF core scanning has evolved to become a standard analytical technique for the rapid assessment of elemental, density and textural variations in a wide range of sediments and other materials, with applications ranging from palaeoceanography, paleoclimatology, geology, and environmental forensics to environmental protection. In general, scanning provides rapid, non-destructive acquisition of elemental and textural variations at sub-millimetre resolution for a wide range of materials. Numerous procedural adaptations have been developed for the growing number of applications, such as analyses of unconsolidated, water-rich sediments, powdered soil samples, or resin bags. Here, practical expertise and guidance from the Itrax community, gained over 15 years, is presented that should provide insights for new and experienced users.
  •  
7.
  • Nyberg, Martin, et al. (författare)
  • Risk of Recurrent Disease 6 Years After Open or Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the Prospective Controlled Trial LAPPRO
  • 2020
  • Ingår i: European Urology Open Science. - : Elsevier BV. - 2666-1691 .- 2666-1683. ; 20, s. 54-61
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: Conclusive evidence of superiority in oncological outcome for robotassisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) over retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) is lacking. Objective: To compare RALP and RRP regarding recurrent disease and to report the mortality rate 6 yr after surgery. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 4003 men with localized prostate cancer were enrolled between 2008 and 2011 in Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO)- a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized trial performed at 14 Swedish centers. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Data were collected at visits and by patient questionnaires at 3, 12, and 24 mo, and through a structured telephone interview at 6 yr. Cause of death was retrieved from the National Cause of Death Register in Sweden. The modified Poisson regression approach was used for analyses. Results and limitations: After adjustment for patient-, tumor-, and surgeon-related confounders, no statistically significant difference was observed between RALP and RRP in biochemical recurrence rate (14 vs 16%, relative risk [RR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-1.06) or in not cured endpoint (22% vs 23%, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.6-1.11). Stratified by D'Amico risk group, a significant benefit for RALP existed for recurrent disease in high-risk patients (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.86, p = 0.02). All-cause mortality was 3% (n = 96). Prostate cancer-specific mortality was 0.6% (n = 21) overall, 0.3% (n = 8) after RALP, and 1.5% (n = 13) after RRP. The nonrandomized design is a limitation. Conclusions: No significant difference was observed for cancer recurrence rate between RALP and RRP 6 yr after surgery. However, in a subgroup analysis, we found a significant benefit for RALP regarding recurrence rate in the high-risk group. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to make a firm conclusion and to evaluate a possible survival benefit. Patient summary: In general, the oncological outcome is comparable between robotic and open radical prostatectomy 6 yr after surgery. For high-risk patients, our findings indicate that there is an advantage for robotics, but further studies with longer follow-up time is needed to make a firm conclusion. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
  •  
8.
  • Almers, Peter, et al. (författare)
  • Exercises
  • 2005
  • Ingår i: Wireless Communications. - 9780470848883 - 047084888X - 0470848871 ; , s. 561-593
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
9.
  • Bratt, Ola, 1963, et al. (författare)
  • The Swedish national guidelines on prostate cancer, part 1: early detection, diagnostics, staging, patient support and primary management of non-metastatic disease
  • 2022
  • Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Urology. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 56:4, s. 265-273
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Objective There is now an unprecedented amount of evidence to consider when revising prostate cancer guidelines. We believe that there is a value in publishing summaries of national clinical guidelines in English for others to read and comment on. Methods This is part 1 of a summary of the Swedish prostate cancer guidelines that were published in June 2022. It covers the early detection, diagnostics, staging, patient support and management of the non-metastatic disease. Part 2 covers recurrence after local treatment and management of the metastatic disease. Results The 2022 Swedish guidelines include several new recommendations: rectal iodine-povidone to reduce post-biopsy infections, external beam radiation with focal boost to the tumour, use of a pre-rectal spacer to reduce rectal side effects after external beam radiotherapy in some expert centres, 6 months' concomitant and adjuvant rather than neoadjuvant and concomitant hormonal treatment together with radiotherapy for unfavourable intermediate and high-risk disease, and adjuvant abiraterone plus prednisolone together with a GnRH agonist for a subgroup of men with very high-risk disease. The Swedish guidelines differ from the European by having more restrictive recommendations regarding genetic testing and pelvic lymph node dissection, the risk group classification, recommending ultra-hypofractionated (7 fractions) external radiotherapy for intermediate and selected high-risk cancers, by not recommending any hormonal treatment together with radiotherapy for favourable intermediate-risk disease, and by recommending bicalutamide monotherapy instead of a GnRH agonist for some patient groups. Conclusions The 2022 Swedish prostate cancer guidelines include several new recommendations and some that differ from the European guidelines.
  •  
10.
  • Bratt, Ola, 1963, et al. (författare)
  • The Swedish national guidelines on prostate cancer, part 2: recurrent, metastatic and castration resistant disease
  • 2022
  • Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Urology. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 2168-1805 .- 2168-1813. ; 56:4, s. 278-284
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Objective There is now an unprecedented amount of evidence to consider when revising prostate cancer guidelines. We believe that there is a value in publishing summaries of national clinical guidelines in English for others to read and comment on. Methods This is part 2 of a summary of the Swedish prostate cancer guidelines that were published in June 2022. This part covers recurrence after local treatment and management of metastatic and castration resistant disease. Part 1 covers early detection, diagnostics, staging, patient support and management of non-metastatic disease. Results The 2022 Swedish guidelines include several new recommendations. Among these is a recommendation of a period of observation with repeated PSA tests for patients with approximately 10 years' life expectancy who experience a BCR more than 2-5 years after radical prostatectomy, to allow for estimating the PSA doubling time before deciding whether to give salvage radiotherapy or not. Recent results from the PEACE-1 trial led to the recommendation of triple-treatment with a GnRH agonist, abiraterone plus prednisolone and 6 cycles of docetaxel for patients with high-volume metastatic disease who are fit for chemotherapy. The Swedish guidelines differ from the European ones by having more restrictive recommendations about genetic testing of and high-dose zoledronic acid or denosumab treatment for men with metastatic prostate cancer, and by recommending considering bicalutamide monotherapy for selected patients with low-volume metastatic disease. Conclusions The 2022 Swedish prostate cancer guidelines include several new recommendations and some that differ from the European guidelines.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 20
Typ av publikation
tidskriftsartikel (15)
konferensbidrag (4)
bokkapitel (1)
Typ av innehåll
refereegranskat (13)
övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt (7)
Författare/redaktör
Stranne, Johan, 1970 (7)
Carlsson, S (4)
Tilki, Derya (3)
Steineck, G (2)
Bratt, Ola, 1963 (2)
Gandaglia, Giorgio (2)
visa fler...
Akre, O (2)
Fransson, Per (2)
Lilja, Hans (1)
Kåredal, Johan (1)
Tufvesson, Fredrik (1)
Molisch, Andreas (1)
Abbott, Benjamin W. (1)
Schuur, Edward A. G. (1)
McGuire, A. David (1)
Vonk, Jorien E. (1)
Hugelius, Gustaf (1)
Macdonald, Robie W. (1)
Frederick, Jennifer ... (1)
Sayedi, Sayedeh Sara (1)
Schädel, Christina (1)
Zarnetske, Jay P. (1)
Broman, Elias (1)
Bonaglia, Stefano (1)
Nascimento, Francisc ... (1)
Bottai, M (1)
Johansson, E (1)
Egevad, L (1)
Thornton, Brett F. (1)
Johansson, Anders J. (1)
Kohestani, K. (1)
Wiklund, NP (1)
Wiklund, Peter (1)
Steineck, Gunnar, 19 ... (1)
Stattin, P (1)
Bjartell, Anders (1)
Almers, Peter (1)
Hellstrom, M (1)
O'Regan, Matt (1)
Edfors, Ove (1)
Tyritzis, S (1)
Onelov, E (1)
Wilderang, U (1)
Andreasson, A (1)
Michel, Martin C. (1)
Löwemark, Ludvig (1)
Vasiliev, Alexander (1)
Lau, Buon Kiong (1)
Humborg, Christoph (1)
Wyne, Shurjeel (1)
visa färre...
Lärosäte
Göteborgs universitet (8)
Karolinska Institutet (7)
Stockholms universitet (4)
Lunds universitet (3)
Umeå universitet (2)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (1)
visa fler...
Örebro universitet (1)
visa färre...
Språk
Engelska (20)
Forskningsämne (UKÄ/SCB)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap (9)
Naturvetenskap (4)
Teknik (1)
Samhällsvetenskap (1)

År

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy