| 1. |
- Aasen, Elin Margrethe, et al.
(författare)
-
Scandinavian Online Cancer Information as Expressions of Governmentality
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Advances in Nursing Science. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0161-9268 .- 1550-5014. ; 46, s. 293-305
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the “right” decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses
|
|
| 2. |
- Dahlborg, Elisabeth, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
The struggle between welfare state models and prevailing healthcare policy in Scandinavian healthcare legislative documents
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Health Governance. - 2059-4631. ; :1, s. 51-64
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose The paper aims to compare and discuss the findings of discursive constructions of patients in legal texts from the three Scandinavian countries. Since traditional welfare state systems in Scandinavia are being challenged by new governance systems, new questions are being raised about patient positions and agency, carrying with them potential ethical dilemmas for healthcare professionals.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology of the paper is inspired by critical discourse analysis. Comprehensively analysing the findings of previous discourse studies on how "the patient" is constructed in central policy texts, this study compares the position of the patient in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.FindingsThe paper reveals ideological struggles across the Scandinavian countries, operating at a political level, a legislative level and a healthcare level. It is shown that national governance systems still exert hegemonic power by strongly influencing patients' degree of choice and autonomy. The discursive struggle between welfare state governance and other governance systems in Scandinavia indicates a shift towards a commercial healthcare market although a traditional welfare model is advocated by professionals and researchersResearch limitations/implicationsBecause of the specific conditions of Scandinavian healthcare policy, the findings lack generalisability. The research approach should therefore be explored further in additional contexts.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study can inform policymakers, professionals and patients of the ideological values underlying seemingly objective shifts in national policy.Originality/valueA comparative critical discourse analysis can expose patterns in the Scandinavian approaches to patient rights.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Vestgarden, Lisbeth Alnes, et al.
(författare)
-
Nurses' discursive construction of older adult immigrant patients in hospitals
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMC Health Services Research. - 1472-6963. ; 23:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The immigrant population across Europe is ageing rapidly. Nurses will likely encounter an increasing number of patients who are older adult immigrants. Moreover, access to and equal provision of healthcare is a key issue for several European countries. The relationship between nurses and patients is asymmetrical with unequal power relations; however, the way nurses construct the patient through language and discourse can help maintain or change the balance of power. Unequal power relations can affect access and be a hindrance to equal healthcare delivery. Hence, the aim of this study is to explore how older adult immigrants are discursively constructed as patients by nurses.METHODS: An exploratory qualitative design was used. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of eight nurses from two hospitals. The nurses' narratives were analysed using critical discourse analysis (CDA) as described by Fairclough.RESULTS: The analysis identified an overarching, stable, and dominant discursive practice; 'The discourse of the other', with three interdiscursive practices: (1) 'The discourse on the immigrant patient versus an ideal patient'; (2) 'The expert discourse'; and (3) 'The discourse of adaption'. Older immigrant adults were constructed as 'othered' patients, they were different, alienated, and 'they' were not like 'us'.CONCLUSION: The way nurses construct older adult immigrants as patients can be an obstacle to equitable health care. The discursive practice indicates a social practice in which paternalism overrides the patient's autonomy and generalization is more prevalent than a person-centred approach. Furthermore, the discursive practice points to a social practice wherein the nurses' norms form the basis for normal; normality is presumed and desirable. Older adult immigrants do not conform to these norms; hence, they are constructed as 'othered', have limited agency, and may be considered rather powerless as patients. However, there are some examples of negotiated power relations where more power is transferred to the patient. The discourse of adaptation refers to a social practice in which nurses challenge their own existing norms to best adapt a caring relationship to the patient's wishes.
|
|
