| 1. |
- Alexius, Katarina, et al.
(författare)
-
Forskare: Ge socialtjänsten rätt verktyg
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Svenska dagbladet. - Stockholm. - 1101-2412. ; :2015-12-11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Att socialtjänstens personal kan hantera och tolka nyckelbegrepp som ”barnets bästa” och ”god vård” är helt avgörande för förstärkningar av barns reella rättigheter, skriver forskare vid Stockholms universitet och Ersta Sköndal högskola.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Tärnfalk, Michael
(författare)
-
Barn och brott : - En studie om socialtjänstens yttranden i straffprocessen för unga lagöverträdare
- 2007
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The aim of this thesis is to scrutinise the statements from the social authorities to the criminal courts in the juvenile justice process, and to analyse in what extent these statements influenced the criminal courts in their penalty sentencing for boys aged 15-17 years, suspected and convicted for assault and battery and grand assault and battery, in Stockholm County the years of 1998 and 2000.In 1998 a child’s perspective and the concept of the best interest of the child was introduced in the Social services act. A legal reform in 1999 in the criminal code introduced the concept of just desert for juvenile offenders, to make the juvenile justice system more predictable and fair and to make the statements more clarifying to the courts. Laws, preparatory documents and legal doctrine are studied. Theoretically, discourse analysis and neoinstitutional organisational theories are points of departure. The empirical material consists of criminal statistics, 103 statement from the welfare agencies and 103 criminal court records. The social authorities statements are scrutinised to discern specific patterns of intervention and then analysed together with criminal court records. The result indicates that the juvenile justice system seems to be unpredictable and unfair due to several factors linked to each other. There is a striking uncertainty in the statements because of great variations. The concept of the best interest of the child is hardly expressed as an interest in the statements. Social interventions are proposed both on the behalf of the child’s needs and to punish the child in a criminal justice mode. The statements seem to influence the courts sentencing in a great extent but there are difficulties to discern the grounds for differences in criminal sentencing. The juvenile justice system and the social services laws seem to be incompatible by contradictions in terms.
|
|
| 5. |
- Tärnfalk, Michael, 1960-
(författare)
-
Barn och brott : en studie om socialtjänstens yttranden i straffprocessen för unga lagöverträdare
- 2007
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- A basic pillar of the Swedish juvenile justice system is that children who commit crimes at first hand should be surrendered to the local social services authorities (further on: also welfare agencies) for treatment, according to their needs. This is based on the idea that children lack the capacity to fully understand the consequences of their crimes. A main prerequisite for this is that the welfare agencies have given a statement to the prosecutor or the criminal court. In this statement the welfare agencies are expected to clearly describe the child’s situation and needs and what kind of measures the child will receive, if surrendered to the welfare agencies. In 1998 a child’s perspective and the concept of the best interest of the child was introduced in the Social services act. A legal reform in 1999 in the criminal code emphasised that young lawbreakers should be punished more proportionate to the severity of their crimes. The latter reform aimed at making the juvenile justice system more predictable and fair, based on important criminal justice principles. It also aimed at making the statements from the welfare agencies more clarifying in the criminal justice process. The aim of this thesis is to scrutinise, describe and analyse these statements from the welfare agencies to the courts, how the courts consider these statements and to what extent the statements has influenced the criminal courts in their penalty sentencing for boys aged 15-17 years suspected and convicted of assault and battery and grand assault and battery. The study is limited to Stockholm County in the years 1998 and 2000. Different methods and material are used. Laws, preparatory documents and legal doctrines are studied. The empirical material consists of criminal statistics, 103 statement from the welfare agencies and 103 criminal court records in the same criminal cases. The laws are studied as communicative systems, i.e. discourses. A sample of six statements are analysed as a discoursive genre under pressure from different kinds of legal and societal demands, to discern specific patterns in the statements. Then 15 statements are analysed together with 15 criminal court records in a neoinstitutional organisational context. The result indicates that the juvenile justice system seem to be unpredictable and unfair due to several factors that are linked to each other. There is a strikin, uncertaint/ in the statements because of ,reat variations in how they are written, difficulties to discern on 2hat ,roun4s interventions are 4eci4e4, and what the welfare agencies judge as a social problem that require an intervention and 2hat is meant b/ the chil47s nee4 in the statements. Theconce8t of the best interest of the chil4 is not e:8resse4 as an important factor in the statements. The statements contains two different foci and three different strategies; no interventions;interventions; and a blen4e4 strate,/. Interventions are proposed on the grounds of the chil47s nee4s as well as the need to 8unish the chil4 for his crime in a criminal
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Tärnfalk, Michael, 1960-, et al.
(författare)
-
Social worker motivations and organisational prerequisites for care of children who commit crimes : the best interests of the child or the protection of society?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Social Work. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1369-1457 .- 1468-2664. ; 24:1, s. 21-33
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Swedish juvenile justice system’s placing of children aged 15–17 under one roof in Secure Youth Care institutions presents a dilemma for social work officers attempting to resolve delinquency cases in the best interests of the child. Retrospective interviews were conducted in 2015 and mainly in Stockholm County with six professional social services officers (SSOs). The data were processed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), social science theory, relevant law, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and material from the National Board of Health and Welfare. Main results show that SSOs were concerned about the risk of faulty assessments, the inadequacy of methods and insufficient attention being paid to relevant scientific knowledge. All in all, the task of protecting the child vis-à-vis protecting society becomes a major challenge in an institution where there is no clear line of demarcation between punishment and care and rehabilitation efforts. Sweden’s ambition to incorporate the CRC into Swedish law requires more focused education of personnel and national guidelines concerning the best interests of the child, as well as the allocation of more adequate resources to allow for more time with each client.
|
|
| 8. |
- Tärnfalk, Michael, et al.
(författare)
-
Social worker motivations and organisational prerequisites for care of children who commit crimes – the best interests of the child or the protection of society? : [Socialarbetares skilda motiv och organisatoriska förutsättningar för vård av barn som begår brott – Barnets bästa eller samhällets skydd?]
- 2021
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Social Work. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1369-1457 .- 1468-2664. ; 24:1, s. 21-33
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Swedish juvenile justice system’s placing of children aged 15–17 under one roof in Secure Youth Care institutions presents a dilemma for social work officers attempting to resolve delinquency cases in the best interests of the child. Retrospective interviews were conducted in 2015 and mainly in Stockholm County with six professional social services officers (SSOs). The data were processed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), social science theory, relevant law, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and material from the National Board of Health and Welfare. Main results show that SSOs were concerned about the risk of faulty assessments, the inadequacy of methods and insufficient attention being paid to relevant scientific knowledge. All in all, the task of protecting the child vis-à-vis protecting society becomes a major challenge in an institution where there is no clear line of demarcation between punishment and care and rehabilitation efforts. Sweden’s ambition to incorporate the CRC into Swedish law requires more focused education of personnel and national guidelines concerning the best interests of the child, as well as the allocation of more adequate resources to allow for more time with each client.
|
|
